-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
One of the reasons I ran for President was because I believed so strongly that the voices of everyday Americans, hardworking folks doing everything they can to stay afloat, just weren’t being heard over the powerful voices of the special interests in Washington. And the result was a national agenda(日常工作事项) too often skewed(曲解的,歪斜的) in favor of those with the power to tilt1 the tables.
In my first year in office, we pushed back on that power by implementing(实施,贯彻,执行)—— historic reforms to get rid of the influence of those special interests. On my first day in office, we closed the revolving2 door between lobbying firms and the government so that no one in my administration would make decisions based on the interests of former or future employers. We barred gifts from federal lobbyists to executive branch officials. We imposed tough restrictions3 to prevent funds for our recovery from lining4 the pockets of the well-connected, instead of creating jobs for Americans. And for the first time in history, we have publicly disclosed the names of lobbyists(游说者) and non-lobbyists alike who visit the White House every day, so that you know what’s going on in the White House – the people’s house.
We’ve been making steady progress. But this week, the United States Supreme5 Court handed a huge victory to the special interests and their lobbyists – and a powerful blow to our efforts to rein6 in corporate7 influence. This ruling strikes at our democracy itself. By a 5-4 vote, the Court overturned more than a century of law – including a bipartisan campaign finance law written by Senators John McCain and Russ Feingold that had barred corporations from using their financial clout8 to directly interfere9 with elections by running advertisements for or against candidates in the crucial closing weeks.
This ruling opens the floodgates for an unlimited10 amount of special interest money into our democracy. It gives the special interest lobbyists new leverage11 to spend millions on advertising12 to persuade elected officials to vote their way – or to punish those who don’t. That means that any public servant who has the courage to stand up to the special interests and stand up for the American people can find himself or herself under assault come election time. Even foreign corporations may now get into the act.
I can’t think of anything more devastating13 to the public interest. The last thing we need to do is hand more influence to the lobbyists in Washington, or more power to the special interests to tip the outcome of elections.
All of us, regardless of party, should be worried that it will be that much harder to get fair, common-sense financial reforms, or close unwarranted tax loopholes that reward corporations from sheltering their income or shipping14 American jobs off-shore.
It will make it more difficult to pass commonsense(常识的) laws to promote energy independence because even foreign entities15 would be allowed to mix in our elections.
It would give the health insurance industry even more leverage to fend16 off reforms that would protect patients.
We don’t need to give any more voice to the powerful interests that already drown out the voices of everyday Americans.
And we don’t intend to. When this ruling came down, I instructed my administration to get to work immediately with Members of Congress willing to fight for the American people to develop a forceful, bipartisan response to this decision. We have begun that work, and it will be a priority for us until we repair the damage that has been done.
A hundred years ago, one of the great Republican Presidents, Teddy Roosevelt(罗斯福), fought to limit special interest spending and influence over American political campaigns and warned of the impact of unbridled, corporate spending. His message rings as true as ever today, in this age of mass communications, when the decks are too often stacked against ordinary Americans. And as long as I’m your President, I’ll never stop fighting to make sure that the most powerful voice in Washington belongs to you.(本文由在线英语听力室整理编辑)
1 tilt | |
v.(使)倾侧;(使)倾斜;n.倾侧;倾斜 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 revolving | |
adj.旋转的,轮转式的;循环的v.(使)旋转( revolve的现在分词 );细想 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 restrictions | |
约束( restriction的名词复数 ); 管制; 制约因素; 带限制性的条件(或规则) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 lining | |
n.衬里,衬料 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 rein | |
n.疆绳,统治,支配;vt.以僵绳控制,统治 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 corporate | |
adj.共同的,全体的;公司的,企业的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 clout | |
n.用手猛击;权力,影响力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 interfere | |
v.(in)干涉,干预;(with)妨碍,打扰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 unlimited | |
adj.无限的,不受控制的,无条件的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 leverage | |
n.力量,影响;杠杆作用,杠杆的力量 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 advertising | |
n.广告业;广告活动 a.广告的;广告业务的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 devastating | |
adj.毁灭性的,令人震惊的,强有力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 shipping | |
n.船运(发货,运输,乘船) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 entities | |
实体对像; 实体,独立存在体,实际存在物( entity的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 fend | |
v.照料(自己),(自己)谋生,挡开,避开 | |
参考例句: |
|
|