-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
One week after U.S. President Barack Obama urged Congress to act swiftly to spur job creation and economic growth, bipartisan backing for his proposals has yet to materialize. The president’s package of temporary tax cuts and short-term additional federal spending faces daunting2 legislative3 hurdles4.
In a nationally-televised address to Congress last Thursday, a feisty-sounding President Obama challenged lawmakers to take a break from partisan1 gridlock and unite to boost a sagging5 U.S. economy.
“There are steps we can take right now to improve people’s lives. I am sending this Congress a plan that you should pass right away,” he said.
The $447-billion package would cut taxes paid by wage-earners, as well as businesses that hire new workers, extend government-provided jobless benefits, and boost federal spending on domestic infrastructure6. Longer term, the administration wants to end corporate7 tax breaks and raise taxes on the wealthy.
In the Republican-controlled House of Representatives, Majority Leader Eric Cantor said he is willing to trim taxes, but opposes additional spending by a federal government already drowning in debt.
Cantor pointed8 out that an $878-billion stimulus9 plan enacted10 at the start of the Obama administration failed to bring U.S. unemployment below the current nine-percent range.
“The stimulus program was a failure. Why would we want to go do something like that again?” he asked.
That message is echoed by Republicans in the Senate, where the party is in the minority but can still block legislation. The ranking Republican on the Senate Budget Committee, Jeff Sessions, said the Obama jobs plan would eradicate11 initial savings12 from last month’s contentious13 federal budget agreement.
“Should not we think very, very carefully about a new stimulus plan that would spend $450 billion, obliterating14 that [budget] savings?” said Sessions.
President Obama’s allies in Congress argue America’s fiscal15 woes16 will only worsen if the economy languishes17 and millions remain unemployed18. Democratic Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts said, “We need [economic] growth, not just revenue and not just [spending] cuts. Any economist19 will tell us: creating jobs today helps reduce the deficit20 tomorrow.”
Democrats21 also argue that corporations and the wealthy who benefited from previous tax breaks should be willing to pay more now in order to spare the poor and middle class from further economic pain.
Senator Richard Durbin of Illinois said, “Those who are making the highest incomes in America should join with every other family in America and help us get beyond this recession.”
This week, Congress heard conflicting testimony22 from two well-known economists23 on the value of government spending during economic downturns. The head of the Congressional Budget Office, Douglas Elmendorf, appeared to back the Obama administration’s call for short-term stimulus combined with long-term fiscal austerity.
“To provide the greatest boost to economic activity now, and the medium and long term, the combination of fiscal policies likely to be most effective would be [to] cut taxes or increase spending in the near term. But over the longer term, move in the opposite direction and cut spending or raise taxes,” he said.
Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan had a very different message when discussing America’s debt burden.
“Our spending is already committed to more than we have the capacity of achieving. And unless and until we understand that our problem is spending, and not taxes, I think we will lead ourselves astray,” said Greenspan.
House Speaker John Boehner urged reducing government regulation, while also cutting federal taxes and spending.
House Majority Leader Cantor said partisan disagreements on how best to invigorate the economy will set the stage for next year’s general election.
AP
House Majority Leader Eric Cantor of Virginia speaks with reporters about jobs, as Congress waits for President Barack Obama to submit the jobs plan, in his Capitol Hill office in Washington, D.C., September 12, 2011. (AP)
“Republicans and Democrats are not going to agree on everything. And maybe the issue of taxation24 and some other issues will have to be left for the election,” said Cantor.
The administration is urging Congress to hold up-or-down votes on the president’s entire jobs plan. But White House spokesman Jay Carney said the president will sign any portion that arrives on his desk.
点击收听单词发音
1 partisan | |
adj.党派性的;游击队的;n.游击队员;党徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 daunting | |
adj.使人畏缩的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 legislative | |
n.立法机构,立法权;adj.立法的,有立法权的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 hurdles | |
n.障碍( hurdle的名词复数 );跳栏;(供人或马跳跃的)栏架;跨栏赛 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 sagging | |
下垂[沉,陷],松垂,垂度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 infrastructure | |
n.下部构造,下部组织,基础结构,基础设施 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 corporate | |
adj.共同的,全体的;公司的,企业的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 pointed | |
adj.尖的,直截了当的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 stimulus | |
n.刺激,刺激物,促进因素,引起兴奋的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 enacted | |
制定(法律),通过(法案)( enact的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 eradicate | |
v.根除,消灭,杜绝 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 savings | |
n.存款,储蓄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 contentious | |
adj.好辩的,善争吵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 obliterating | |
v.除去( obliterate的现在分词 );涂去;擦掉;彻底破坏或毁灭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 fiscal | |
adj.财政的,会计的,国库的,国库岁入的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 woes | |
困境( woe的名词复数 ); 悲伤; 我好苦哇; 某人就要倒霉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 languishes | |
长期受苦( languish的第三人称单数 ); 受折磨; 变得(越来越)衰弱; 因渴望而变得憔悴或闷闷不乐 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 unemployed | |
adj.失业的,没有工作的;未动用的,闲置的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 economist | |
n.经济学家,经济专家,节俭的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 deficit | |
n.亏空,亏损;赤字,逆差 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 testimony | |
n.证词;见证,证明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 economists | |
n.经济学家,经济专家( economist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 taxation | |
n.征税,税收,税金 | |
参考例句: |
|
|