-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
A complex operation is involved as the U.S. sends weapons to Ukraine
NPR's Leila Fadel talks to Gen. Jacqueline Van Ovost, head of the U.S. Transportation Command, about the massive task of shipping1 weapons to Ukraine to help in the fight against Russia.
LEILA FADEL, HOST:
We wanted to know more about this enormous and complex operation. The U.S. has moved millions of pounds of material to Ukraine. According to the military, it's the biggest operation since the Berlin Airlift in the late 1940s. So we talked to the person in charge of shipping all those heavy weapons to Ukraine. The head of the U.S. Transportation Command, or TRANSCOM, is General Jacqueline Van Ovost. She's only - she's one of only two female four-star generals in the Department of Defense2 right now. She spoke3 to me from the National Defense University here in D.C.
JACQUELINE VAN OVOST: Essentially4, what we are is a global transportation company. We have about 130,000 sailors, airmen, Marines, guardians5 and civilians6 - along with our commercial partners - that provide global transportation services. So now as I look to how we do this for Ukraine, and providing security assistance and as well as providing assurance and deterrence8 for the NATO nations, we mobilize here in the United States, and we bring forward our soldiers. We bring forward our equipment to help assure and deter7, and we have brought millions of pounds - so far about 45 million pounds - of aid to Ukraine to assist them.
FADEL: Is that all weaponry, the 45 million pounds?
VAN OVOST: No, it's a combination of lethal9 and non-lethal aid.
FADEL: Mmm hmm. Now, you've had to move a lot of aid quickly. Were there any specific obstacles or challenges you had to get past to move it quicker than usual?
VAN OVOST: Our ability to move within days or even hours of the first request is because we so carefully collaborate10 and plan with U.S. European Command, who is in complete touch with Ukrainians to understand what their needs are and with NATO, all the way through to where our sources of supply are. So for example, with the non-standard ammunition11 - ammunition that we don't actually have in our stocks - where is that? And, you know, who's offering it, and how are we going to get it there? And we have to work together with our allies and partners. You know, we've had over 30 nations participate, and so how do we best orchestrate that large dance across the globe?
FADEL: Now, you mentioned that you also work with private companies - commercial airlines, commercial shipping - that partner with the U.S. military to transport these weapons. How big of a role do private companies play?
VAN OVOST: In what we do around the world, we are inextricably linked to our commercial partners. When we first started providing aid to Ukraine - lethal aid - on 21 January, it was what I call a white tail, or one of our commercial assets, that was landing in Kyiv before the invasion and beginning to supply them with that lethal aid.
FADEL: I want to talk about cybersecurity. It's something you have spoken about a lot. When you testified before a House subcommittee in March, you said cybersecurity is a major concern of yours because private companies, unlike the military, communicate in an unclassified environment. So right now, with heightened concern around possible cyberattacks from Russia, is it risky12 for the U.S. to partner with private companies to transport weapons?
VAN OVOST: As you know, I am concerned about cyber defense, both from a Department of Defense standpoint and from our commercial partners because we rely on them and their networks. But I tell you, talking to the C-suite leaders, they are very focused, themselves, on ensuring that they are a hard target. We've been partnering with our commercial partners to help them understand the threats and ways to mitigate13 those threats a little more.
FADEL: How unprecedented14 is this moment, in the sense of the speed and level of aid - especially lethal aid - that you're moving?
VAN OVOST: Well, you know - so I've been in the military 33 years, and I've seen nothing like it. Our ability to support another nation at this level is really - it's unprecedented. It shows, though, how when American leadership and NATO leadership come together, that we can move out and meet the promises - whether it's deterring15 Russia from attacking a NATO nation to supporting Ukraine in their defense of their nation and their humanitarian16 needs - that we will be there delivering.
FADEL: You are part of a transportation pipeline17 that is moving a huge amount of weaponry. Do you have any concerns that it could wind up in the wrong hands?
VAN OVOST: Well, certainly any of the equipment we move around to our allies and partners around the world - there is always a chance that some equipment will not be used in the way that we had intended or that it gets taken by another party. We have safeguards in place with respect to different types of equipment. But you know what? What I think about is the rationale for what we're doing right now, with the equipment that we're giving them and the support that we're giving them - that's what we want to focus on. Because we calculate those losses when we make these decisions and when the president makes these decisions, and it's our job to get out there and execute. And every capability18 and, frankly19, every piece of aid that I can give each Ukrainian is important.
FADEL: I know I can't let you go without speaking to you about the fact that you are one of two women who are four-star generals in the Department of Defense. I mean, what is that like to be one of two in 2022?
VAN OVOST: (Laughter) You know, I never wanted to be one of two, but it's better than one of one, which is where I started, so (laughter).
FADEL: Right.
VAN OVOST: So - but, you know, what an honor it is to command the men and women of U.S. Transportation Command. And, you know, I've had great opportunities throughout my life. And I say to folks, if you marry up your passion and your talent, you won't work a day in your life, everything you do will be rewarding, and the system will reward you, right? And so I've had great opportunities that I've been able to capitalize on, and here I am sitting at the pinnacle20 of leadership, leading the men and women of Transportation Command and having taken part of both Operation Allies Refuge and now this - just this groundbreaking work with Ukraine and NATO. I just couldn't be prouder of what we do at Transportation Command and of the United States for the leadership role that we've played.
FADEL: But it couldn't have been easy coming up, I mean, a little bit lonely, right?
VAN OVOST: Yeah.
FADEL: I mean, one of two...
VAN OVOST: Yeah.
FADEL: ...And like you said, one of one at one point.
VAN OVOST: You can't be what you can't see. When you look up and you don't see someone that looks like you, it's very hard to think that you could actually do that, right? But I tell you, we just need to show out there that, you know, people - they can do it, right? Just because you don't see someone up there that looks like you doesn't mean you can't do it.
FADEL: General Jacqueline Van Ovost, thank you so much for speaking with us.
VAN OVOST: Thanks, Leila.
1 shipping | |
n.船运(发货,运输,乘船) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 essentially | |
adv.本质上,实质上,基本上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 guardians | |
监护人( guardian的名词复数 ); 保护者,维护者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 civilians | |
平民,百姓( civilian的名词复数 ); 老百姓 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 deter | |
vt.阻止,使不敢,吓住 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 deterrence | |
威慑,制止; 制止物,制止因素; 挽留的事物; 核威慑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 lethal | |
adj.致死的;毁灭性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 collaborate | |
vi.协作,合作;协调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 ammunition | |
n.军火,弹药 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 risky | |
adj.有风险的,冒险的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 mitigate | |
vt.(使)减轻,(使)缓和 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 unprecedented | |
adj.无前例的,新奇的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 deterring | |
v.阻止,制止( deter的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 humanitarian | |
n.人道主义者,博爱者,基督凡人论者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 pipeline | |
n.管道,管线 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 capability | |
n.能力;才能;(pl)可发展的能力或特性等 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 frankly | |
adv.坦白地,直率地;坦率地说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 pinnacle | |
n.尖塔,尖顶,山峰;(喻)顶峰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|