-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Ukraine will prevail over Russia and we will help them, NATO official says
Russia's invasion of Ukraine is coming up on three months with no end in sight. NPR's Steve Inskeep speaks with NATO Deputy Secretary General Mircea Geoana about the alliance's objectives in Ukraine.
STEVE INSKEEP, HOST:
A question once posed about the war in Iraq now looms2 over the war in Ukraine. How does this end? To a large extent, that is Russia's problem. Russia chose the war and has suffered heavy losses. But of course, it matters to Ukraine and to members of the NATO alliance. So how can NATO countries affect the outcome now? NATO Deputy Secretary General Mircea Geoana is on the line. Good morning.
MIRCEA GEOANA: Good morning.
INSKEEP: Is your side winning?
GEOANA: Winning will - it will prevail. And what the NATO allies and partners of Ukraine in Europe and around the world - assisting Ukraine to prevail in this conflict that is - as you mentioned, is not their invention. It's a Russian imperial fantasy based on the idea that the Ukrainian nation does not exist, based on idea that the West will be not as united as we are today and basically feeding false narratives3 in our public opinions that this is NATO's fault. So Ukraine will prevail, and we'll help them do that.
INSKEEP: But I'm just thinking through the situation now. Clearly, Russia has failed in many of its goals, has suffered catastrophic losses on the battlefield, is presumably also suffering from sanctions. And yet, from a certain Russian perspective, they control more territory than they did 2 1/2 months ago. They control some large portions of Ukraine and don't seem to be going anywhere. Do you see the way or the moment they would be pushed back or forced to stop?
GEOANA: We have to remember that the original intention and the current intention, at least in President Putin's mind, was either the occupation of the whole of Ukraine or at least, at minimum, getting rid of President Zelenskyy and his government. So from this original intentions of Putin and the reality today, that's a huge strategic failure for Russia. They lost the battle for Kyiv. Now, after seeing the Donbas and in southern Ukraine, their fierce fight - and Ukrainian forces are also, in some places, mounting counteroffensive. I cannot say how long this thing will drag. It depends on many things.
But as Russia is depleting4 its forces, depleting its ammunitions - and also, the morale5 of the Russian troops is at the lowest, I think, that probably ever existed in the Russian army historically. This is indication to us that in the end, Ukraine will prevail. How you define success and victory - this is up to President Zelenskyy and his people. We are helping6 them fight the war, prevail in this war. And the terms of some form of political conclusion sometime down the road - they belong to President Zelenskyy and his brave people.
INSKEEP: Granting just what you said, that it belongs to Ukrainians and the president there to decide, it seems to me there's two plausible7 end states that you could push for. One is to push Russians entirely8 out of all of Ukraine. But the other is to push them back and leave them only in control of the parts of Ukraine they seized in 2014. Is it imaginable that that could be the solution, pushing Russians back to the borders that they claimed in 2014?
GEOANA: Yeah, there are, again, two dimensions to this conversation. The first one is the balance of power and the results on the battlefield. And here, we are convinced, and we have confidence, that Ukraine would eventually prevail on the battlefield. The second dimension, which is always important, is the political discussion. And this is, again, up to President Zelenskyy and his judgment9 to define where he feels strong enough to engage with Putin, if Putin wants to engage, on a position of strength and eventually coming out with a political solution. But for the time being, we see the dynamic of this war going in Ukraine's favor. And the more the Russian attrition continues and the more equipped and trained the Ukrainian army is, the odds10, I think, by the day, go in Ukraine's favor. And we do everything we can as NATO allies to support that end of this conflict.
INSKEEP: Deputy Secretary General, as everybody knows, NATO nations would like to avoid an escalation11 of this war, would like to avoid other countries being attacked or Russia getting an excuse to attack other countries. And given that, is there any risk in how very, very open NATO nations have been about their support for Ukraine - not just sending weapons, but news leaks indicating the U.S. helped to target a Russian ship and other things?
GEOANA: Secretary General Stoltenberg and myself and the leadership of NATO - we have a triple obligation. The first one is to continue to support Ukraine. And this is working very, very well. The second obligation is to defend NATO territory and populations. And the third obligation we have is to avoid the risk of escalation...
INSKEEP: There we go.
GEOANA: ...And having a war between NATO and Russia. And all three fronts can be done and will be done together, helping Ukraine, defending allies and avoiding escalation with Russia.
INSKEEP: One other thing to ask about here - what is your plan to safely accept Finland or Sweden as new NATO members, if they should request NATO membership? It seems there could be a tricky12 transition there.
GEOANA: The two countries are very close partners to NATO for many, many years. We've been exercising together. We've been exchanging strategic, political and military issues over time. I can say one thing. If they decide to ask becoming members of NATO, our response would be very warm, and the process would be very expeditious13. And people might ask why we would eventually do this in a very compressed timeline. For the very reason I mentioned at the beginning - both countries are strong democracies. They have impeccable militaries, and they have a level of interoperability already with NATO that is just at the highest levels. So my anticipation14, if they decide - it's their democratic right to choose their destiny. And as the policy of NATO, open-door policy is a reality of NATO.
INSKEEP: A couple of NATO nations tried to cultivate good relations with Russia. Could a single NATO nation block the membership of Finland or Sweden?
GEOANA: NATO is an organization working by consensus15. But I have not sensed any opposition16 from any of the member states and the allies in NATO. So it is my anticipation that if they decide, allies will be acting17 quickly, receiving them warmly, and this will be in unanimity18.
INSKEEP: Mircea Geoana is deputy secretary general of NATO. Thanks for your time, sir.
GEOANA: My pleasure.
1 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 looms | |
n.织布机( loom的名词复数 )v.隐约出现,阴森地逼近( loom的第三人称单数 );隐约出现,阴森地逼近 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 narratives | |
记叙文( narrative的名词复数 ); 故事; 叙述; 叙述部分 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 depleting | |
使大大的减少,使空虚( deplete的现在分词 ); 耗尽,使枯竭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 morale | |
n.道德准则,士气,斗志 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 helping | |
n.食物的一份&adj.帮助人的,辅助的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 plausible | |
adj.似真实的,似乎有理的,似乎可信的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 judgment | |
n.审判;判断力,识别力,看法,意见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 odds | |
n.让步,机率,可能性,比率;胜败优劣之别 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 escalation | |
n.扩大,增加 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 tricky | |
adj.狡猾的,奸诈的;(工作等)棘手的,微妙的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 expeditious | |
adj.迅速的,敏捷的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 anticipation | |
n.预期,预料,期望 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 consensus | |
n.(意见等的)一致,一致同意,共识 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 opposition | |
n.反对,敌对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 acting | |
n.演戏,行为,假装;adj.代理的,临时的,演出用的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 unanimity | |
n.全体一致,一致同意 | |
参考例句: |
|
|