-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Candidates who deny the 2020 presidential election results are winning races
NPR's Rachel Martin talks to professor Rick Hasen at UCLA School of Law about the election deniers who may be in positions that have a direct role in the vote certification process.
RACHEL MARTIN, HOST:
So it's worth repeating - there is no evidence of widespread election fraud during the 2020 presidential election. Yet, as you just heard, candidates who deny the outcome are winning office in battleground states across the country, including Nevada, Arizona, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin. We have called up professor Rick Hasen at UCLA School of Law. He is director of UCLA's Safeguarding Democracy Project. Rick, thanks for being here.
RICK HASEN: Great to be with you.
MARTIN: What's your biggest concern about the current momentum2 that election deniers seem to have right now?
HASEN: Well, I think it's kind of a double whammy that the country faces. And the first part, we're losing people who are skilled at running elections. Elections are really difficult to run. It requires great competence3. It requires experience. And No. 2, we're replacing those people in some cases - or we have the risk of replacing people - who either believe or say they believe that the last election was stolen. If that's true, not only might they be willing to do something to try to even the score, but even if they try to run elections fairly, are the rest of the people in the area going to believe that the elections are run fairly after they've embraced this false claim that the last election was stolen? And so it really can both hurt voter confidence and also hurt the actual administration of elections.
MARTIN: I mean, that - you just underscored what could be so damaging, right? There is this follow-on effect that when election deniers are put in these positions, the voters who did support those election officials aren't going to trust them. And trust is eroded4 on both sides. How do you recover from that?
HASEN: So it's really difficult. When you think about what makes a democracy work, it's what political scientists call loser's consent. It's the idea that, well, I wasn't happy that my side lost, but the election was fair and square, and I'll regroup and organize the next time.
MARTIN: Right.
HASEN: When people start losing confidence in the election process - and already, we've seen it in the Republican base, thanks to Trump5's relentless6 claims that the last election was stolen - that could start spreading now to the left and to the center. And then you really don't have a working democracy when people don't trust election results. So we're in a very precarious7 place. And we've got to bolster8 those institutions and people that can help assure that our elections continue to be run fairly and are done with confidence.
MARTIN: And what does that look like? I mean, it's one thing to just keep raising awareness9 about the issue. But what you've outlined is a very precarious situation, when such a cross section of Americans across the political divide stop having faith in these institutions. So what can be done? I mean, we're looking down the pike at the November midterms.
HASEN: Right. And I think the really big target is 2024 because a lot of the people who are going to be chosen in the 2022 elections are the ones that are going to be running the 2024 elections. And that's where, if Donald Trump is running again, he could try to be making these claims and undermining confidence. So I think there's a number of things that could be done. No. 1, Congress can pass a law. There are now a group of bipartisan senators who are talking about not only fixing the Electoral Count Act, but putting in provisions that would - for example, if a governor tries to mess with the election results for president or state, that there's a judicial10 review of that to try to overturn that.
I think running elections fairly is important. Running elections transparently11 so everyone can watch the process from the time people vote and recognizing that there are other actors that need to get involved, whether that's courts or nongovernmental organizations or just, you know - because our elections are so decentralized, everyone can be involved on the local level to at least observe what's going on. And so we have to be vigilant12. Now's not the time to just throw up our hands and say, look; these people might win office. What are we going to do about it? There's stuff to do.
MARTIN: Well, should the federal government - I mean, you just outlined this issue. It's decentralized. Our electoral system is decentralized on purpose. Should the federal government have greater oversight13 of state and local elections?
HASEN: Well, you know, I think, in the long term, we could consider - and I've long believed - that we should be like most other advanced democracies and have national nonpartisan election administration. That's not happening anytime soon. So we need to think about the ways of having checks and balances. And the federal government does have a role to play. If Congress does pass legislation, that gives more court oversight. And also, I should point out that in every state, there is the ability to go to court to ensure that state courts are helping14 to enforce state law. So the judiciary is an important bulwark15 against attempts to deny election results and to try to manipulate them.
MARTIN: Professor Rick Hasen teaches at UCLA School of Law, where he is director of UCLA's Safeguarding Democracy Project. We so appreciate your time this morning. Thank you.
HASEN: Thank you.
(SOUNDBITE OF THE SIX PARTS SEVEN'S "NIGHTLONG")
1 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 momentum | |
n.动力,冲力,势头;动量 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 competence | |
n.能力,胜任,称职 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 eroded | |
adj. 被侵蚀的,有蚀痕的 动词erode的过去式和过去分词形式 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 relentless | |
adj.残酷的,不留情的,无怜悯心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 precarious | |
adj.不安定的,靠不住的;根据不足的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 bolster | |
n.枕垫;v.支持,鼓励 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 awareness | |
n.意识,觉悟,懂事,明智 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 judicial | |
adj.司法的,法庭的,审判的,明断的,公正的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 transparently | |
明亮地,显然地,易觉察地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 vigilant | |
adj.警觉的,警戒的,警惕的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 oversight | |
n.勘漏,失察,疏忽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 helping | |
n.食物的一份&adj.帮助人的,辅助的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 bulwark | |
n.堡垒,保障,防御 | |
参考例句: |
|
|