-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
U.S. and South Korea formalize a series of steps to try to deter1 North Korea
NPR's Steve Inskeep talks to Jenny Town of the thank tank the Stimson Center about an agreement between the U.S. and South Korea aimed at deterring3 North Korea from escalating4 military aggression5.
STEVE INSKEEP, HOST:
South Korea's president, Yoon Suk Yeol, addresses a joint6 session of Congress today. He was in Washington as President Biden announced a new military pact7 with South Korea.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN: Over the past seven decades, our alliance has grown stronger and more capable. The cooperation between our people, our commitment to one another, has grown deeper across every aspect of our partnership8.
INSKEEP: Now, as part of this agreement, the United States says it will send nuclear submarines to the waters off South Korea. We've called up Jenny Town, senior fellow at the Stimson Center and director of its 38 North program, which studies the two Koreas. Jenny, welcome back.
JENNY TOWN: Thank you. It's great to be back.
INSKEEP: The president alluded9 to it there - a seven-decade-old alliance. It goes back, formally, to the end of the Korean War, where the United States, of course, fought on the side of South Korea. So what is new about this agreement now?
TOWN: Well, this agreement really does address some of the requests that have come out of South Korea over the past several years to know more about how U.S. decision-making, how U.S. nuclear policy actually works. There's always been a sense of, you know, there's a lot of conventional capabilities10, a lot of conventional cooperation that's very integrated with the Combined Forces Command. But when it came to extended deterrence11, there was a lot of, well, just trust us. You know, the U.S. will make the right decision at the right time. And so this is now really starting a deeper level of dialogue on nuclear policy, on the potential use. What are some factors that would affect and impact any kind of decision-making on the potential use of nuclear weapons on the Korean Peninsula?
INSKEEP: I want to make this blatant12, if I can. When you talk about nuclear deterrence, if South Korea is thinking about this, they're thinking, we don't have nuclear weapons. North Korea has nuclear weapons. We would like it known that if nuclear weapons are used against us, the United States will or may use nuclear weapons in retaliation13, which hopefully prevents any from being used at all. Is that what South Korea wants more assurances on?
TOWN: That is what South Korea wants more assurances on, even though it has been rather explicit14 that this is one of the tools that is at the disposal of the alliance at any given time.
INSKEEP: How much does it matter that nuclear-capable submarines from the United States go to South Korean waters or that area, even if they don't have nuclear missiles on board?
TOWN: It's really a sign that - again, that it's possible. This is something we do have. Strategic assets that have visited the region pretty frequently, especially at times of higher tensions, is a reminder15 that - you know, of the full weight of the alliance capabilities. It's meant to sort of signal a show of force and - as well as be a reassuring16 sign to the South Koreans that the U.S. is there, it's paying attention, that the Combined Forces are capable and that, you know, the - they're prepared to, as they say in Korea, fight tonight.
INSKEEP: What makes South Korea feel that it needs more reassurance17 now, granting there are these North Korean missile tests, but it seems there are always North Korean missile tests.
TOWN: Well, these days, there are always North Korean missile tests. I think, you know, there's a lot of factors. Like, since 2017, North Korea has been working on and demonstrated more and more capable intercontinental ballistic missiles. This makes South Korea very nervous that North Korea's ability to hold the U.S. also at risk directly would affect U.S. willingness and commitment to coming to South Korea's defense18 if something happened, worried that it could also be held hostage to North Korean nuclear missiles.
And as well as - you know, I think the impact of Russia's invasion of Ukraine had a real psychological effect in South Korea of what happens if you have a nuclear-armed - a large nuclear-armed adversary19 as a non-nuclear weapons country. And so I think there's just a lot of greater anxiety about the entire, you know, security situation in northeast Asia these days and whether or not the U.S. can be deterred20 of - from defending South Korea or if they can even be distracted or even prevented from doing so.
INSKEEP: Jenny Town, it's always a pleasure talking with you. Thanks for your insights.
TOWN: All right. Thanks, Steve.
INSKEEP: Jenny Town is director of the 38 North Program at the Stimson Center.
1 deter | |
vt.阻止,使不敢,吓住 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 deterring | |
v.阻止,制止( deter的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 escalating | |
v.(使)逐步升级( escalate的现在分词 );(使)逐步扩大;(使)更高;(使)更大 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 aggression | |
n.进攻,侵略,侵犯,侵害 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 joint | |
adj.联合的,共同的;n.关节,接合处;v.连接,贴合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 pact | |
n.合同,条约,公约,协定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 partnership | |
n.合作关系,伙伴关系 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 alluded | |
提及,暗指( allude的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 capabilities | |
n.能力( capability的名词复数 );可能;容量;[复数]潜在能力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 deterrence | |
威慑,制止; 制止物,制止因素; 挽留的事物; 核威慑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 blatant | |
adj.厚颜无耻的;显眼的;炫耀的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 retaliation | |
n.报复,反击 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 explicit | |
adj.详述的,明确的;坦率的;显然的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 reminder | |
n.提醒物,纪念品;暗示,提示 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 reassuring | |
a.使人消除恐惧和疑虑的,使人放心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 reassurance | |
n.使放心,使消除疑虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 adversary | |
adj.敌手,对手 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 deterred | |
v.阻止,制止( deter的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|