-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
An EPA proposal to (almost) eliminate climate pollution from power plants
Coal and gas-fired power plants would have to eliminate nearly all their climate-warming carbon dioxide emissions4 in just a little over a decade, under proposed regulations issued today by the Environmental Protection Agency.
Owners of those plants have been allowed to spew climate-warming carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere for more than a century. If these proposed regulations are finalized5, they would come close to putting a stop to that practice.
"The EPA's proposed rule sends an unequivocal signal to American power plant operators: the era of unlimited6 carbon pollution is over," wrote Dan Lashof, U.S. Director at the World Resources Institute, in a statement responding to the proposal.
The regulations are based on technologies that capture and then store deep underground 90% of carbon dioxide from coal and gas-fired plants. But some facilities that plan to shut down in coming years or that operate at less than 20% of their capacity would be subject to less stringent7 requirements. Those could include adding cleaner hydrogen to natural gas to limit its climate-warming effects.
Environmental groups welcomed the rules, which are almost certain to face opposition8 and a legal challenge from the fossil fuel industry and its allies.
"EPA's proposal relies on proven, readily available technologies to limit carbon pollution and seizes the momentum9 already underway in the power sector10 to move toward a cleaner future," said EPA Administrator11 Michael Regan.
The EPA projects the rules would avoid up to 617 million metric tons of carbon dioxide through 2042. The agency says that's the equivalent to the annual emissions of 137 million passenger vehicles, or about half of the cars on the road today.
Regan says the regulation would also bring health benefits by reducing other air pollutants12, such as particulate13 matter, sulfur14 dioxide and nitrogen oxide2. The EPA projects that in 2030, the proposed rules would prevent 1,300 premature15 deaths, more than 800 hospital and emergency room visits and more than 300,000 cases of asthma16 attacks. While the rules could increase electricity prices a "negligible" amount, the agency values the net climate and health benefits would be up to $85 billion.
The regulations also would help the U.S. meet its obligations under the 2015 Paris climate agreement, and they would be crucial in meeting President Biden's goal of zeroing out carbon pollution from the electricity sector by 2035.
A climate regulation nearly a decade in the making
Power plants are the second biggest source of climate-warming greenhouse gas emissions in the country, according to the EPA, behind transportation.
The newly proposed rules would help the country get closer to the Biden administration goal of reducing greenhouse gasses 50 to 52% by 2030, based on 2005 emissions. Other initiatives to hit that goal include rules that will require more cars to be electric, tighter energy efficiency standards for appliances and switching buildings from gas to electric.
According to the Supreme17 Court's landmark18 2007 Massachusetts v. EPA decision, the EPA is required to regulate carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act.
In 2014 the Obama administration proposed its "Clean Power Plan" aimed at cutting carbon dioxide emissions from power plants 32%, from 2005 levels, by 2030. That plan faced legal challenges and never went into effect. Still the country met that goal well before 2030, as coal-fired power plants were replaced by natural gas plants that emit less climate pollution than coal. Despite fast growth of climate-friendly wind and solar power, about 60% of the country's electricity still comes from fossil fuels.
President Biden came into the office with the most ambitious plan to address climate change of any major party candidate in U.S. history, with a goal for the country to stop adding carbon dioxide to the atmosphere by 2050.
Scientists say that's what's needed to limit warming to 1.5 Celsius19 (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) over pre-industrial levels and avoid the worst effects of climate change. Global average temperatures have already risen about 1.1 degrees Celsius.
The new EPA rules were shaped by legal battles. Last year, the Supreme Court restricted the agency's options for regulating power plant emissions. Justices said that without a specific law, the agency cannot force the entire power generation industry to move away from fossil fuels toward less-polluting energy sources.
"It told EPA some things it could not do, but it also told EPA the path that's open, under the law," says David Doniger of the Natural Resources Defense20 Council.
The proposed rules set emission3 limits for power plants and then let power plant owners decide how they'll meet the requirements, which could include shutting down their facility. The EPA concludes technologies, such as carbon capture and storage, that have been too expensive in the past are now more affordable21, especially with tax credits available under the climate-focused Inflation Reduction Act that was passed last year.
Still, the coal industry may have the most to lose under this proposal. There are currently 158 active coal power plants, according to the Sierra Club. Despite the EPA's analysis, the National Mining Association says carbon capture technology is not yet "technically22 and fully23 economically demonstrated." The organization called for a "carbon capture moonshot."
The coming legal fight
Criticism from the coal industry and its allies came even before the proposed rules were announced, some of it from within President Biden's own party.
"This Administration is determined24 to advance its radical25 climate agenda and has made it clear they are hell-bent on doing everything in their power to regulate coal and gas-fueled power plants out of existence," said Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., in a statement released by his office. In addition to representing a state where coal remains26 a powerful business, Manchin's family owns a coal company. Manchin said he would oppose the Biden administration's EPA nominees27 until the White House halts "their government overreach."
Coal remains a major industry in West Virginia and preserving coal-fired electricity is a priority for many people there. State regulators recently approved a $3 million per month surcharge on customers' bills to keep a coal plant from shutting down at the end of May. Customers will pay the subsidy28 even if the plant doesn't generate electricity, though it will keep the facility's 146 employees on the payroll29.
West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey, who's also running for governor, led a legal challenge by states opposed to the 2015 Clean Power Plan. He's expected to lead a similar legal challenge to these rules, once they are finalized next year.
The regulations also could face opposition from the natural gas industry, which has sought to preserve its role in electricity generation. The American Petroleum30 Institute, in comments submitted before the rule was released, urged "EPA to consider the essential role gas-fired generators31 will continue to play in complementing32 renewables," and asked for "significant compliance33 flexibility34."
Critics also argue the regulations will force coal and gas-fired power plants to shut down and leave the grid35 vulnerable to blackouts. But EPA Administrator Regan says this issue was considered. He recently signed a memorandum36 of understanding with the Department of Energy that is aimed at keeping the grid reliable and stable.
Even if the regulation survives an expected court challenge and takes effect, a future administration could change it. In 2019 former President Trump37 replaced the Obama-era Clean Power Plan with his much weaker Affordable Clean Energy rule. That means these rules likely will become an issue in the upcoming 2024 presidential election campaign.
1 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 oxide | |
n.氧化物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 emission | |
n.发出物,散发物;发出,散发 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 emissions | |
排放物( emission的名词复数 ); 散发物(尤指气体) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 finalized | |
vt.完成(finalize的过去式与过去分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 unlimited | |
adj.无限的,不受控制的,无条件的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 stringent | |
adj.严厉的;令人信服的;银根紧的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 opposition | |
n.反对,敌对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 momentum | |
n.动力,冲力,势头;动量 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 sector | |
n.部门,部分;防御地段,防区;扇形 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 administrator | |
n.经营管理者,行政官员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 pollutants | |
污染物质(尤指工业废物)( pollutant的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 particulate | |
adj.微小的;n.微粒,粒子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 sulfur | |
n.硫,硫磺(=sulphur) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 premature | |
adj.比预期时间早的;不成熟的,仓促的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 asthma | |
n.气喘病,哮喘病 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 landmark | |
n.陆标,划时代的事,地界标 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 Celsius | |
adj.摄氏温度计的,摄氏的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 affordable | |
adj.支付得起的,不太昂贵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 technically | |
adv.专门地,技术上地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 fully | |
adv.完全地,全部地,彻底地;充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 determined | |
adj.坚定的;有决心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 radical | |
n.激进份子,原子团,根号;adj.根本的,激进的,彻底的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 nominees | |
n.被提名者,被任命者( nominee的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 subsidy | |
n.补助金,津贴 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 payroll | |
n.工资表,在职人员名单,工薪总额 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 petroleum | |
n.原油,石油 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 generators | |
n.发电机,发生器( generator的名词复数 );电力公司 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 complementing | |
补足,补充( complement的现在分词 ); 求反 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 compliance | |
n.顺从;服从;附和;屈从 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 flexibility | |
n.柔韧性,弹性,(光的)折射性,灵活性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 grid | |
n.高压输电线路网;地图坐标方格;格栅 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 memorandum | |
n.备忘录,便笺 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|