-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Well, the big question for most taxpayers1, are we getting the most bang out of our buck2?
Our next guest says that the answer to that is a big fat costly3 no. Jeffrey Miron has some pretty impressive credentials4. He's a visiting professor in the Department of Economics at Harvard, and is also tied at MIT and the University of Michigan.
All right, Jeffrey, I think it was about a year ago, you said that this stimulus5 package was a bad idea.
You still think it is?
I still think it's a bad idea. And I should emphasize it's this stimulus package that I'm criticizing, because it was focused especially on spending rather than being focused on tax cuts. When you decide you're going to spend a lot of money quickly, it's very hard to spend it well, and a lot of the things we are spending it on are not especially productive or they are mainly just shifting people from jobs they already had into different government jobs. Had we done tax cuts, we would have put that purchasing power in the hands of individuals and firms, and that would have lead on average to much better decisions about how that extra demand would have been spent.
All right. Let's talk about the tax cuts for a minute. Because Jeffrey Sax, and you know Jeffrey Sax, highly- respected economist6, said -- let me address that tax issue. You know, he says there is no room, nor case for broad-based personal or corporate7 income tax cuts or credits or rebates8. He said the deficit9 is hemorrhaging and will do so for years to come. And with aging, health care cost increases, etcetera, the underlying10 chronic11 deficits12 will tend to rise, not fall. We will therefore need increased, not decreased taxes.
Well, Jeff is taken as given that we need to do all the spending that we are doing. But my position is that a huge amount of existing government spending is actually not especially productive. And over the long term, we should be cutting it very substantially.
And he is ignoring the evidence, okay, which part of it produced by Christina Romer, the chairman of the council of economic advisers13 under Obama, which finds that tax cuts are very effective in stimulating14 the economy evidenced by a lot of other people. It doesn't find much evidence that spending increases our effect at stimulating the economy. Either one, of course, adds to the deficit in the short term. But over the longer term, the tax cuts probably add less because they help make the economy more efficient and that leads to more income etcetera that can be taxed going down the road.
1 taxpayers | |
纳税人,纳税的机构( taxpayer的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 buck | |
n.雄鹿,雄兔;v.马离地跳跃 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 costly | |
adj.昂贵的,价值高的,豪华的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 credentials | |
n.证明,资格,证明书,证件 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 stimulus | |
n.刺激,刺激物,促进因素,引起兴奋的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 economist | |
n.经济学家,经济专家,节俭的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 corporate | |
adj.共同的,全体的;公司的,企业的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 rebates | |
n.退还款( rebate的名词复数 );回扣;返还(退还的部份货价);折扣 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 deficit | |
n.亏空,亏损;赤字,逆差 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 underlying | |
adj.在下面的,含蓄的,潜在的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 chronic | |
adj.(疾病)长期未愈的,慢性的;极坏的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 deficits | |
n.不足额( deficit的名词复数 );赤字;亏空;亏损 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 advisers | |
顾问,劝告者( adviser的名词复数 ); (指导大学新生学科问题等的)指导教授 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 stimulating | |
adj.有启发性的,能激发人思考的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|