-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Hey, I抦 Anderson Cooper. Thanks forwatching the podcast. New details in the Libyan investigation1, why the WhiteHouse story, so doesn抰 fill out the facts, also ridiculous. Let抯 get start.
We have breaking news tonight in the wakeof the Libya tragedy. Late word tonight from the U.S. State Department they arepulling more staffers out of the embassy in Tripoli because of securityconcerns. Also tonight, and also security related, new details. They抮e comingin reaction to our exclusive reporting last night on how quickly officialsactually suspected that the killing2 of our Americans in Benghazi was an act ofterror, and how troubled the subsequent investigation into that deadly assaultwas turning out to be. Today, 16 days after the attack, Defense3 Secretary LeonPanetta stated plainly what was obvious to many, including Senator John McCainjoins us shortly almost from the beginning.
As we determined4 that details of what tookplace there and how that attack took place, that it became clear that therewere terrorists who had planned that attack.
Well, the best we can tell, this is thefirst time any administration officials has uttered the word planned todescribe what happened. Asked how long it took to reach his conclusion,Secretary Panetta said quote 揑t took awhile?once information from Benghazicame back. But Keeping them Honest multiple sources now tell 360 that officialsknew this was a terror attack almost from the get-go within 24 hours. At leastintelligence officials, yet this is what they were saying for more than a weekpublicly after the killing.
It抯 important to know that there is an FBIinvestigation that has begun, and will take some time to be completed. Thatwill tell us with certainty what transpired5, but our current best assessment,based on the information that we have at present is that in fact what thisbegan as was a spontaneous not a premeditated response to what had transpiredin Cairo.
Now there are many possible explanationsfor why the administration took so long, so long to budge6 from that line,everything from an excess of caution to the fog of war to incompetence7 ordomestic politics. We don抰 have the answer nailed down on that. What we dohave though is a collection of inconsistencies between the administration lineand our own understanding of the facts. Now recall our exclusive reporting lastnight based on several sources that not one single FBI investigator8 has yet toeven set foot at the crime scene in Benghazi. That remains9 true tonight. Yetwhen asked to comment, an American official told us that FBI investigators10 onthe ground are not experiencing any roadblocks and are working well with Libyanofficials. That same official attributed the FBI抯 absence from Benghazi tosecurity concerns.
Keeping them honest, though, Libya抯 newlyelected prime minister told CNN抯 Arwa Damon a full week ago that investigatorshad been invited into Libya and that the Libyans would provide any neededprotection. Whether or not the Libyan government could have delivered on thatpromise, we will never know. What we do know is that no FBI agents are inBenghazi, according to our reporting. The crime scene remains unprotected andsomehow the official line seems to be that everything is going fine with theLibyan government and the FBI investigation. As we said, new details tonight,CNN抯 Fran, national security analyst11 Fran Townsend got some of them. So didCNN contributor Bob Baer. Fran, of course, is the former White House homelandsecurity advisor12, a current member of the CIA抯 External Advisory13 Board. Sherecently traveled to Libya with her employer, MacAndrews & Forbes. Bob is aformer CIA officer with deep experience in the Middle East and the Arab world.Also on the phone from Tripoli, CNN抯 Jomana Karadsheh. I guess I抦 just alittle surprised, Fran, how they can say that, I mean how they are paintingthat what抯 happening on the ground in Libya, especially based on what you arehearing from your sources.
Look, look, Anderson, you know, there, wehave not, this is not the first international terrorism investigationregrettably going back to the East Africa embassy bombings in the late 90s, theUSS Cole in 2000. This is we understand how to do these. The FBI抯 got protocols14 about what does itlooks like when you have to deploy15 investigators and forensic16 folks to collectevidence overseas. So this is not the first time they抳e done it. Theyunderstand that in order to do that effectively, you have to have protection onthe ground. You抳e got to have somebody who can do a perimeter17. You ask in thefirst instance the host government to do that. If for some reason the Libyanprime minister suggested to Arwa that they thought they could provide thatprotection safely, but even if U.S. officials had security concerns where theydidn抰 think that was enough, the next step is to ask the United Statesmilitary, can they, will they and can they provide protection and to get,request permission from the host government to allow them to come in, the U.S.forces, solely18 to protect the perimeter of the scene and the investigatorswhile they are there. And best we can tell, we don抰 know if that抯 everhappened.
点击收听单词发音
1 investigation | |
n.调查,调查研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 killing | |
n.巨额利润;突然赚大钱,发大财 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 determined | |
adj.坚定的;有决心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 transpired | |
(事实,秘密等)被人知道( transpire的过去式和过去分词 ); 泄露; 显露; 发生 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 budge | |
v.移动一点儿;改变立场 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 incompetence | |
n.不胜任,不称职 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 investigator | |
n.研究者,调查者,审查者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 investigators | |
n.调查者,审查者( investigator的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 analyst | |
n.分析家,化验员;心理分析学家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 advisor | |
n.顾问,指导老师,劝告者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 advisory | |
adj.劝告的,忠告的,顾问的,提供咨询 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 protocols | |
n.礼仪( protocol的名词复数 );(外交条约的)草案;(数据传递的)协议;科学实验报告(或计划) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 deploy | |
v.(军)散开成战斗队形,布置,展开 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 forensic | |
adj.法庭的,雄辩的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 perimeter | |
n.周边,周长,周界 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 solely | |
adv.仅仅,唯一地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|