-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Well, Mitt1 Romney is in Poland tonight, the final stop on a three-country trip that's made headlines, some favorable, others not so much.
His remarks on the Olympics angered some British. He walked them back. His remarks in Israel on why the Palestinians haven't done as well economically as Israelis angered Palestinians. Culture, he said, makes all the difference.
He praised the Israeli health care system, his critics point out, in comparison with Americans. But he didn't mention that the Israeli system is government run. Something he's obviously opposed to here at home. He clarified earlier remarks also about Russia to Wolf Blitzer.
The last time you and I spoke2 in an interview, you told me that Russia was America's number one geostrategic foe3. Do you still believe that?
Well, there's no question, but that, in terms of geopolitics, I'm talking about votes at the United Nations and the actions of a -- of a geopolitical nature.
Russia is the number one adversary4 in that regard. That doesn't make them an enemy. It doesn't make them a combatant. They don't represent the number one national security threat. The number one national security threat, of course, to our nation is a nuclear Iran.
Mr. Romney has drawn5 praise from conservatives for his line on Iran as well as his vocal6 support for Israel.
As for the trip so far, two questions. First, how will it affect his chance in November if at all? And second, what does it say, if anything, about how he'd run foreign policy if elected?
Let's talk about the "Raw Politics" with the Republican strategist, Ari Fleischer, an unpaid7 occasional adviser8 to the Romney campaign, and board member of the Republican Jewish Coalition9.
Also with us, Cornell Belcher, a pollster for the Obama 2012 campaign.
Ari, do you think that Governor Romney did what he needed to do overseas? Do you think it's going to help him in long term?
In Israel, he certainly did. You know, I do have to say, even though I think it's been ridiculous, seems exaggerated, and it's been going on now for five days, he did a mistake in England and it cost him the opportunity to bask10 in the glow of the Olympics. But if he was running for prime minister, it might hurt him. He was, he's running for president.
In Israel, I think he knocked it out the ballpark. I think if the issue there is the impact this trip will have on the Jewish community in the United States, calling Jerusalem the capital is what those American Jews who vote on the basis of foreign policy and defense11 will remember from this trip, and also today, of course Lech Walesa giving him a virtual endorsement12.
You know, that's, I think, the power of the trip for him.
Cornell, one of your campaign surrogates, former Ambassador Tim Roemer, questioned Romney's ability to be commander in chief, saying quote "If he can't engage our allies on a simple topic like the international Olympics, how is he going to be tough enough to stand up to our gravest enemies like Iran?"
Romney, though, was pretty tough on Iran in his speech in Israel. In fact, he articulated a policy. It sounded pretty similar to President Obama's. Is that really then a fair criticism?
Well, here's the problem.
I mean, and you - and CNN has been covering it for two days now - it is gaffe13 after gaffe. I mean, you leave Israel, you know, with after insulting the Palestinians. And here's the problem, if you're in fact President Romney, the problem is, you've now offended the Palestinians. And they don't see you as a fair arbitrator.
So in fact he - President Romney would set the peace process back in the Middle East. But to step back from sort of the politics back and forth14 of it, from a campaign standpoint, I know we want to say that, you know, this one is or that one incident, this gaffe or that gaffe, isn't problematic. But at this point, it's become accumulative. I mean, there is an aggregate15 problem here, after gaffe after gaffe.
And at some point from just a purely16 campaign standpoint, I have to pile on with what some Republicans were saying a couple of weeks back, you know, like some of the campaign itself is problematic because some of these statements that are coming out right now should never been green lighted, like the whole line that, the cultural line in the Palestinian stuff.
Someone along the process should have said, there's a way to talk about Israeli exceptionalism without offending its neighbors around them. So that becomes problematic. And no, you're not going to sort of win the presidency17 on foreign policy. But you can be hurt and undermined by it and this trip has not helped him.
点击收听单词发音
1 mitt | |
n.棒球手套,拳击手套,无指手套;vt.铐住,握手 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 foe | |
n.敌人,仇敌 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 adversary | |
adj.敌手,对手 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 drawn | |
v.拖,拉,拔出;adj.憔悴的,紧张的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 vocal | |
adj.直言不讳的;嗓音的;n.[pl.]声乐节目 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 unpaid | |
adj.未付款的,无报酬的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 adviser | |
n.劝告者,顾问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 coalition | |
n.结合体,同盟,结合,联合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 bask | |
vt.取暖,晒太阳,沐浴于 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 endorsement | |
n.背书;赞成,认可,担保;签(注),批注 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 gaffe | |
n.(社交上令人不快的)失言,失态 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 forth | |
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 aggregate | |
adj.总计的,集合的;n.总数;v.合计;集合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 purely | |
adv.纯粹地,完全地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 presidency | |
n.总统(校长,总经理)的职位(任期) | |
参考例句: |
|
|