-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
The head of the World Intellectual Property Organization and leading experts from U.S. and European universities are urging the U.S. and China to solve trade disputes under multilateral frameworks like the World Trade Organization, saying that everybody loses in a trade war.
WIPO Director General Francis Gurry says the ongoing1 trade frictions2 between U.S. and China is bad news all around, and is urging the U.S. to focus on the bigger picture of the global economy, instead of its own profits.
"We live in a globalized economy, and that globalized economy relies on cooperation between countries and between economic agents all around the world in various countries. And we see that, for example, in global value chains where the whole production process and distribution process is divided up into various segments with particular functions being performed by a wide range of actors across the world. And we need to consider not the end result, in terms of deficits3 or surpluses, but all the value additions that take place throughout the global value chain."
He says the multilateral trading system is necessary for a healthy and steady global economy.
"It's very important for the preservation4 of this cooperative globalization that has been gradually put in place in the course of last 20 years in particular, to ensure that trade tensions are managed, and trade tensions don't result in so-called trade wars."
Gurry made the remarks in New York during the launch ceremony of the "Global Innovation Index 2018," an annual ranking of the world's most innovative5 economies, jointly6 released by WIPO, Cornell University, and other partners. The GII 2018 rankings show that China broke into the world's top 20 most-innovative economies, climbing to 17th from 22nd last year, while the U.S. dropped from 4th place last year to 6th.
Bruno Lanvin, co-editor of GII 2018 and Executive Director of Global Indices at INSEAD, a business school based in France, says a trade war benefits no one.
"Clearly there are signs of tensions which are leading to negative sum results, that is everybody loses in a trade war. And it's not just US and China, it's that Europe, all emerging countries are going to suffer if the trade war is not finished soon."
He is urging the international community to restore the credibility of WTO in addressing these trade issues.
"We keep a strong multilateral arena7 in which these issues can be discussed. WTO has a number of committees on trades in particular, that all the right place to discuss these issues as opposed to bilateral8 context. So we need to make all efforts internationally to restore the credibility and reliability9 of this multilateral context for trade and intellectual property disputes."
Lanvin says the U.S. needs to put more strength into developing its own economy, instead of targeting other countries.
"Clearly starting a war is not generally a sign of strength, it's a sign of weakness. If you feel you are weakened in one area, if you feel your interests are threatened, you want to elevate the conflicts into a higher level. So I think it's also a matter by which the US economy will increase its level of confidence. The more confident people are going to be, the more they are going to want to play it fair in international trade matters."
1 ongoing | |
adj.进行中的,前进的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 frictions | |
n.摩擦( friction的名词复数 );摩擦力;冲突;不和 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 deficits | |
n.不足额( deficit的名词复数 );赤字;亏空;亏损 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 preservation | |
n.保护,维护,保存,保留,保持 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 innovative | |
adj.革新的,新颖的,富有革新精神的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 jointly | |
ad.联合地,共同地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 arena | |
n.竞技场,运动场所;竞争场所,舞台 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 bilateral | |
adj.双方的,两边的,两侧的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 reliability | |
n.可靠性,确实性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|