-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Observers from the US and Chian have met in Beijing to discussing the future of trade between the two sides amid the current trade frictions1.
The US President Donald Trump2 continues to tout3 his theory that the trade deficit4 with China hurts American jobs.
And now with the additional tariffs5 by the US side potentially hitting some 200 billion US dollars or beyond on Chinese imports, he is putting this theory to the test.
On the backdrop of this, scholars from think tanks from both countries have gathered together at the Center for China and Globalization in downtown Beijing to discuss the situation.
Dr. Michael Pillsbury, a China strategist and longtime senior advisor6 to US governments, represents the Hudson Institute during the roundtable discussions.
He says it's the Trump administration's hallmark strategy to use the trade deficit as a way to blame China for US job losses.
"Most of the economist7 in America, they don't think the trade deficit is very important, they think trade deficit is just a simple measure, doesn't cost any jobs, doesn't slow economic growth, so we should not be concerned about it."
Pillsbury, instead, suggests the trade deficit a structural8 problem, saying that he believes Trump is being given bad advice.
Pillsbury also says he believes if the Chinese government continues with its reform and opening up policy, the dispute will eventually solve itself.
Official US statistics from 2017 contend the US registered as $375.6 billion US dollar deficit in its trade in goods with China.
Doctor Wang Huiyao, President of the Center for China and Globalization, says the calculation methods can be improved.
"Calculation of the trade deficits9 should be improved. For example the service trade should be included, so that the deficit won't be seen that big. And also, particularly US multi-nationals operation in China, their income should be considered as well."
Leading trade experts from Beijing and Washington at the session say they both agree that more communication is needed, suggesting that a better understanding of the nuances of trade between China and the US is critical.
To that end, officials attending the event in Beijing have announced the launch of a collaborative research initiative focusing on trade issues.
1 frictions | |
n.摩擦( friction的名词复数 );摩擦力;冲突;不和 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 tout | |
v.推销,招徕;兜售;吹捧,劝诱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 deficit | |
n.亏空,亏损;赤字,逆差 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 tariffs | |
关税制度; 关税( tariff的名词复数 ); 关税表; (旅馆或饭店等的)收费表; 量刑标准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 advisor | |
n.顾问,指导老师,劝告者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 economist | |
n.经济学家,经济专家,节俭的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 structural | |
adj.构造的,组织的,建筑(用)的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 deficits | |
n.不足额( deficit的名词复数 );赤字;亏空;亏损 | |
参考例句: |
|
|