-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
I think the way you do that is to show... OK. That's, I, the regulators watch the tape, they realize the shenanigans goes on. They can go after this. Now, they didn't catch Madoff, that's a shame.
But why, when you talk about the regulators, why not the financial news network? That's the whole point of this.
OK.
CNBC could be an incredibly powerful tool of illumination, for people that believe that there are two markets. One, that has been sold to us as long-term: put your money in 401K’s, put your money in pensions, and just leave it there, don't worry about it, it's all doing fine. Then, there’s this other market, this real market that’s occurring in the back room, where giant piles of money are going in and out and people are trading them. It's transactional and it's fast. But it's dangerous, it's ethically1 dubious2, and it hurts that long-term market. So what it feels like to us, and I am speaking purely3 as a layman4, it feels like we are capitalizing your adventure by our pension and our hard earned. And that it is a game that you know, that you know is going on, but that you go on television as a financial network and pretend isn't happening.
Ok, first, my first reaction is absolutely we can do better, absolutely. There are shenanigans and we should call them out. Everyone should, I should do a better job about it. But my second thing is I talk about the shorts every single night. I've got people in congress who I've been working with to try to get the uptick rule. That's a technical thing but it would cut down a lot of the games that you're talking about. I'm trying, I'm trying. Am I succeeding? I am trying.
But the gentleman in that video is a sober rational individual. And the gentleman on Mad Money is throwing plastic cows through his legs and shouting "Sell, Sell, Sell", and then coming on two days later and going "I was wrong, you should've bought." Like, I can't reconcile the brilliance5 and knowledge that you have of the intricacies of the market with the crazy (bullshit) I see you do every night. That's English. That's treating people like, like adults.
How about if I try it? How about if I try?
Try what?
Try doing that, I'll do that.
Anything I can...
That would be great. But it's not just you. It's larger forces at work. It is this idea that the financial news industry is not just guilty of a sin of omission6 but a sin of commission that they are actually in bed with this idea.
NO, we are not in bed with them. Come on, I don't think that's fair. Honestly, I think that we try to report the news and I think that some people… (A couple of guys do. This guy Faber…) He is fabulous7, Faber. (and there’s… maybe two other guy.) He is fabulous. (Right.) And he did… He has done some things that have really blown the cover off a lot of stuff.
But this thing was ten years in the making. (Right.) And it's not gonna be fixed8 tomorrow. But the idea that you could have on the guys from Bear Sterns and Merrily Lynch, and guys that had leverage9, 35 to 1. (I know.) And then blame Mortgage holders10. I mean that's insane.
I never did that. Well, but no… (The network is…)I'm sorry, you're absolutely right. I always wish the people would come on and swear themselves in before they come on the show. I've had a lot of CEOs lie to me on the show. It's very painful. I don't have subpoena11 power.
But don’t… but you're pretending that you are a dewy-eyed innocent. Watch, Roll… I mean if I may. (It’s your show for Heaven’s sake.) Just Roll 2:12.
No, not 2:12.
You know you can't foment12. That's a violation13 of ... (Ferment?) Yeah, you can't foment. (Foment) You can't create yourself, an impression that stock’s down. But you do it anyway coz the ICC doesn’t understand it. So, you, that mean it would, that's the only sense that I would say this is illegal.
Now (It’s what…) 2:16
Another stock that I’d love you for a focus on right now seems to be Apple.
Yeah, Apple is very important to spread the rumor14 that both Verizon and AT&T have decided15 they don't like the phone. That's very easy one to do because it's also you want to spread the rumor that it’s not gonna be ready for MacWorld. And this is very easy coz the people who write about Apple want that story and you can claim that it's credible16 because you spoke17 to someone at Apple coz Apple’s… doesn't recognize that.
1 ethically | |
adv.在伦理上,道德上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 dubious | |
adj.怀疑的,无把握的;有问题的,靠不住的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 purely | |
adv.纯粹地,完全地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 layman | |
n.俗人,门外汉,凡人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 brilliance | |
n.光辉,辉煌,壮丽,(卓越的)才华,才智 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 omission | |
n.省略,删节;遗漏或省略的事物,冗长 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 fabulous | |
adj.极好的;极为巨大的;寓言中的,传说中的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 fixed | |
adj.固定的,不变的,准备好的;(计算机)固定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 leverage | |
n.力量,影响;杠杆作用,杠杆的力量 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 holders | |
支持物( holder的名词复数 ); 持有者; (支票等)持有人; 支托(或握持)…之物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 subpoena | |
n.(法律)传票;v.传讯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 foment | |
v.煽动,助长 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 violation | |
n.违反(行为),违背(行为),侵犯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 rumor | |
n.谣言,谣传,传说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 credible | |
adj.可信任的,可靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|