-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
by Michael W. Flynn
First, a disclaimer: Although I am an attorney, the legal information in this podcast is not intended to be a substitute for seeking personalized legal advice from an attorney licensed1 to practice in your jurisdiction2. Further, I do not intend to create an attorney-client relationship with any listener.
Before I begin, I am proud to announce the release of Grammar Girl's Quick And Dirty Tips for Better Writing, a new book by Mignon Fogarty that will be available wherever books are sold on July 8th. Reserve a copy now or preorder one from your favorite online retailer3.
Today I will discuss speech limitations by private groups. Rob wrote:
I registered an account at http://godtube.com. I posted a couple comments to 2 videos and a few hours later my account disappeared from their website.
I went back and read the Terms closely and I'm not sure their terms are legal. They've created a public forum4 and then limit what [you’re] allowed to say.
[One term states]: “You agree not to submit or post any User Submission5 to the Site, or transmit any User Submission through the Site, that (a) is contrary to the evangelization of Jesus Christ and His teachings, or constitutes blasphemy6, or is otherwise offensive to our online Christian7 community.”
Do they have the right to limit what I say on their website? Can they really tell me that I can't be contrary to Jesus Christ in their public forums8?
Thanks, Rob. Free speech is a fundamental right enjoyed by Americans under the First Amendment9. But, free speech does not mean that every private group must let you speak. The rules that godtube imposes are perfectly10 legal due to the state action doctrine11.
The First Amendment to the Constitution provides:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging12 the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress13 of grievances14.
The most important part of the text for today’s discussion is “Congress shall make no law . . .” The reason this is important is that the text does not read: “anybody in this country shall make no rule . . .” The First Amendment, and all constitutional maxims15, only apply to actions taken or enforced by the government, not private parties. This is generally known as the state action doctrine. So, before the First Amendment even comes into play, Rob would have to show that the government somehow enforced the rules that godtube created. It seems that godtube itself enforced their rules by removing the comments and videos that Rob posted. So, notions of constitutional free speech simply do not apply.
Turning to the issue of public forum, Rob’s assertion that godtube has created a public forum is incorrect. In constitutional law, a “public forum” refers only to areas owned or operated by the government. A “traditional public forum” is public land that has been used as a traditional area to meet, protest and speak. Common examples include the areas outside courthouses, city halls or embassies. A “designated public forum” is one in which a governmental entity16 opens up its doors to the public for a limited time and purpose. A common example is a public school classroom. The members of the public are not always allowed to speak here, but the government might open up the classroom during a school board meeting for the purpose of discussion and debate.
However, these concepts do not apply because godtube is not the government. The website is free to create a speech forum and place restrictions17 on the content of the speech.
Even if free speech were implicated18, it is important to note something that Rob’s question misses: godtube’s right to free speech and association. By posting Rob’s comments, the website might be seen as endorsing19 the substance of the comments. Godtube has a right to limit the postings to messages that it wishes to disseminate20. Just as godtube could not force Rob to post things on his website, Rob cannot force godtube to post his comments.
So, while some people visiting godtube might consider the website’s message biased21 or limited given that it censors22 out comments that are contrary to its views, it is well within its legal rights. It is a private entity that is free to publish almost anything it likes.
Thank you for listening to Legal Lad’s Quick and Dirty Tips for a More Lawful23 Life. Be sure to check out all the Quick and Dirty Tips podcasts, including our newest member, Make-it-Green Girl's Quick and Dirty Tips for an Earth Friendly Life.
You can send questions and comments to...........or call them in to the voicemail line at 206-202-4LAW. Please note that doing so will not create an attorney-client relationship and will be used for the purposes of this podcast only.
1 licensed | |
adj.得到许可的v.许可,颁发执照(license的过去式和过去分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 jurisdiction | |
n.司法权,审判权,管辖权,控制权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 retailer | |
n.零售商(人) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 forum | |
n.论坛,讨论会 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 submission | |
n.服从,投降;温顺,谦虚;提出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 blasphemy | |
n.亵渎,渎神 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 Christian | |
adj.基督教徒的;n.基督教徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 forums | |
讨论会; 座谈会; 广播专题讲话节目; 集会的公共场所( forum的名词复数 ); 论坛,讨论会,专题讨论节目; 法庭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 amendment | |
n.改正,修正,改善,修正案 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 perfectly | |
adv.完美地,无可非议地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 doctrine | |
n.教义;主义;学说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 abridging | |
节略( abridge的现在分词 ); 减少; 缩短; 剥夺(某人的)权利(或特权等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 redress | |
n.赔偿,救济,矫正;v.纠正,匡正,革除 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 grievances | |
n.委屈( grievance的名词复数 );苦衷;不满;牢骚 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 maxims | |
n.格言,座右铭( maxim的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 entity | |
n.实体,独立存在体,实际存在物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 restrictions | |
约束( restriction的名词复数 ); 管制; 制约因素; 带限制性的条件(或规则) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 implicated | |
adj.密切关联的;牵涉其中的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 endorsing | |
v.赞同( endorse的现在分词 );在(尤指支票的)背面签字;在(文件的)背面写评论;在广告上说本人使用并赞同某产品 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 disseminate | |
v.散布;传播 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 biased | |
a.有偏见的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 censors | |
删剪(书籍、电影等中被认为犯忌、违反道德或政治上危险的内容)( censor的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 lawful | |
adj.法律许可的,守法的,合法的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|