-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
by Michael W. Flynn
First, a disclaimer: Although I am an attorney, the legal information in this podcast is not intended to be a substitute for seeking personalized legal advice from an attorney licensed1 to practice in your jurisdiction2. Further, I do not intend to create an attorney-client relationship with any listener.
Ever wonder why grand juries are grand? Bryan from Alabama did, and wrote:
Here's a question that's been on my mind for awhile -- what's the difference between a "grand jury" and a regular old jury?
Both juries are groups of people that make findings of fact in criminal cases, but grand juries are used before an accused goes to trial, and regular juries are used to determine guilt3 after trial.
Historically, grand juries were used in various public matters. In the 18th century in America, private citizens could petition a grand jury of citizens to determine whether the government should repair a bridge, or whether a tax collector was neglecting his duties, or whether the government should prosecute4 a crime. The grand jury had the power to go out and conduct its own investigations5.
In modern times, grand juries have slowly disappeared, mostly due to the trend of the legislature creating administrative6 bodies to handle things like public works. They are now only used with any regularity7 in the U.S., only for criminal cases, and even here in only about half of the states. Today, grand juries are called only for the purpose of determining whether the prosecutor8, usually the district attorney, has presented enough evidence to allow a trial to go forward. So, if the DA has evidence that a murder has been committed, the DA must present the evidence to the grand jury, and the grand jury decides whether there is enough evidence to charge the accused and proceed with trial. The accused does not participate in the proceedings9, the proceedings are almost entirely10 secret, and the grand jury can compel certain witnesses to appear and testify.
However, only the federal government and about half the states even use grand juries. And, in the jurisdictions11 that do, only charges of felonies or other serious crimes require the use of a grand jury. For misdemeanors, the DA can usually just file the criminal case against the accused and proceed to trial.
In jurisdictions that do not use grand juries, there is usually a preliminary hearing conducted before a judge that serves about the same purpose. So, rather than presenting evidence in secret to a grand jury, a DA will present the evidence he has to a judge, and the judge determines whether there is even enough evidence to move forward with trial.
The purpose of both the grand jury and the preliminary hearing is a form of check on the power of the DA. Rather than the DA being allowed to just charge anyone with anything and force a trial, the DA must muster12 enough evidence, not to prove guilt, but to prove that there is at least enough suspicion to force a person to go through the criminal justice system. In both situations if the grand jury or judge disagrees with the DA, and does not think the evidence is enough, then the DA cannot move forward to trial against the accused. If the grand jury agrees with the DA, then the grand jury will issue an indictment13. Grand juries are typically made of up to 23 people.
A “regular” jury, sometimes called a petit jury, is the jury that most people know from Law and Order: it is the group of 12 peers who listen to the evidence presented in a trial, and determine whether the prosecutor has proven that the defendant14 committed the illegal acts charged beyond a reasonable doubt. This is the second jury, and the second set of checks that is imposed on the government before it can take away a person’s freedom.
So, a grand jury is not fancier or better than a regular jury – it just serves a different purpose in the criminal justice process, and at a different time.
Thank you for listening to Legal Lad’s Quick and Dirty Tips for a More Lawful15 Life. Be sure to take the short listener survey by clicking on the green 5 to the right of the transcript16.
You can send questions and comments to...........or call them in to the voicemail line at 206-202-4LAW. Please note that doing so will not create an attorney-client relationship and will be used for the purposes of this podcast only.
1 licensed | |
adj.得到许可的v.许可,颁发执照(license的过去式和过去分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 jurisdiction | |
n.司法权,审判权,管辖权,控制权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 guilt | |
n.犯罪;内疚;过失,罪责 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 prosecute | |
vt.告发;进行;vi.告发,起诉,作检察官 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 investigations | |
(正式的)调查( investigation的名词复数 ); 侦查; 科学研究; 学术研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 administrative | |
adj.行政的,管理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 regularity | |
n.规律性,规则性;匀称,整齐 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 prosecutor | |
n.起诉人;检察官,公诉人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 proceedings | |
n.进程,过程,议程;诉讼(程序);公报 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 jurisdictions | |
司法权( jurisdiction的名词复数 ); 裁判权; 管辖区域; 管辖范围 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 muster | |
v.集合,收集,鼓起,激起;n.集合,检阅,集合人员,点名册 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 indictment | |
n.起诉;诉状 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 defendant | |
n.被告;adj.处于被告地位的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 lawful | |
adj.法律许可的,守法的,合法的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|