-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
STEVE INSKEEP, HOST:
One year ago today, President Trump1 promised that a new era was beginning at the Justice Department.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: It is with great pride - very great pride - that I say these words to you right now, Attorney General Jeff Sessions.
(APPLAUSE)
INSKEEP: In a year, Sessions has transformed the institution's approach to civil rights and immigration, all while an investigation2 continues into Russia's role in the 2016 election. NPR justice correspondent Carrie Johnson has covered the whole year. She's on the line.
Good morning, Carrie.
CARRIE JOHNSON, BYLINE3: Hi, Steve.
INSKEEP: How different does the department feel to you when you walk through the halls or get people on the phone?
JOHNSON: It does feel different. Of course, the department has had some morale4 problems, in part because President Trump has been attacking both the Justice Department and the FBI for many, many months as a laughingstock and possibly politically biased5. Also, Steve, there are at least six major jobs requiring Senate confirmation6 still open at the Justice Department one year in - more than one year in. And there's not a quick sense that those jobs are going to be filled.
INSKEEP: Well, you mentioned the president's attacks on his own Justice Department. Let's focus on Jeff Sessions here. At his confirmation hearing, he assured senators he would be independent - he would make independent judgments7. He later then did, over the president's objections, recuse himself from the Russia investigation - said he shouldn't be making decisions about it. But what about more recently?
JOHNSON: You know, the first words out of his mouth at his confirmation hearing - Jeff Sessions - were that he would be independent of the president. He's actually tried to have it a bit both ways, especially when it comes to criticism of the people inside his department. Sessions has offered some words of praise for his deputies, including Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. But he also throws critics like the president a bone, saying that he's aware there are sharp criticisms of the department; sunlight is the best disinfectant; and he's not going to ignore problems or bury his hand in the sand when he encounters them.
INSKEEP: Just to understand this - I mean, the president appoints the attorney general. The president is the boss. But is the job such that the attorney general should always be taking the president's orders?
JOHNSON: Well, in matters of policy, the president has a big say. In matters of law enforcement, the practice since Watergate is that the president should have no say. And that's the bright line.
INSKEEP: OK. Well, let's talk about policy as well - policy in law enforcement here. Jeff Sessions has made a number of announcements. He's got clear priorities. And I'm thinking of one in particular - the federal approach to marijuana, which has been legalized in many states but is, of course, illegal at the federal level. Sessions changed the guidance for federal prosecutors8 and law enforcement officials. But we were told at the time it was not clear how much would actually change in terms of prosecutions9 on the ground. Can you think of an issue, Carrie Johnson, in which Jeff Sessions' different approach has actually resulted in something different on the ground?
JOHNSON: Very much so. Attorney General Sessions, in the Senate, had very strong feelings about immigration. And he's already had a major impact on immigration policy. He set benchmarks for immigration judges, trying to get them to move cases along faster. He's moving to strip people of citizenship10 if they lied during the vetting11 process. And of course his Justice Department determined12 that Deferred13 Action for Childhood Arrivals program was unconstitutional and could not be defended in court, which is part of the reason we're in the situation we're in now with respect...
INSKEEP: Oh. That was the justification14 for President Trump saying he would end it in March...
JOHNSON: Exactly.
INSKEEP: ...Unless Congress were to intervene in some way. And that's the thing that's still being debated.
JOHNSON: That's right.
INSKEEP: And he has, you're saying, caused stricter enforcement or stricter punishments, if that's precisely15 the word - stricter outcomes for people who are found to be in the country illegally.
JOHNSON: Yeah. And there's another big area where he's done a lot, which is with respect to civil rights, particularly police investigations16 - only charging individual officers, not investigating entire police departments anymore.
INSKEEP: NPR's Carrie Johnson - always a pleasure. Thank you.
JOHNSON: My pleasure.
1 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 investigation | |
n.调查,调查研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 morale | |
n.道德准则,士气,斗志 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 biased | |
a.有偏见的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 confirmation | |
n.证实,确认,批准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 judgments | |
判断( judgment的名词复数 ); 鉴定; 评价; 审判 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 prosecutors | |
检举人( prosecutor的名词复数 ); 告发人; 起诉人; 公诉人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 prosecutions | |
起诉( prosecution的名词复数 ); 原告; 实施; 从事 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 citizenship | |
n.市民权,公民权,国民的义务(身份) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 vetting | |
n.数据检查[核对,核实]v.审查(某人过去的记录、资格等)( vet的现在分词 );调查;检查;诊疗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 determined | |
adj.坚定的;有决心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 deferred | |
adj.延期的,缓召的v.拖延,延缓,推迟( defer的过去式和过去分词 );服从某人的意愿,遵从 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 justification | |
n.正当的理由;辩解的理由 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 precisely | |
adv.恰好,正好,精确地,细致地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 investigations | |
(正式的)调查( investigation的名词复数 ); 侦查; 科学研究; 学术研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|