-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
STEVE INSKEEP, HOST:
The Food and Drug Administration is being forced to intensify1 scrutiny2 of medical implants3. Now, when you hear the word implants, it's easy to think of cosmetic4 surgery, but the word here includes a growing number of potentially life-saving devices that doctors place inside their patients. The problem is many of the devices have been breaking down.
Blake Farmer of member station WPLN in Nashville reports on the effort to address that.
BLAKE FARMER, BYLINE5: There's no doubt that surgically6 implanted devices improve lives. Drug pumps, nerve stimulators, spinal7 rods - but the devices can also do serious damage like they have to Mechel Keel.
MECHEL KEEL: It ruined my life. Yes, it did. I'm sitting here with tears.
FARMER: Keel had problems with a leaky bladder, so a surgeon stitched a flexible mesh8 strap9 inside her pelvis. But the strap hardened and started cutting her insides. The pain kept her from returning to her job in Michigan as a hairdresser. Removing all the bits and pieces embedded10 in the scar tissue has required multiple surgeries and resulted in chronic11 infections.
Keel can see why her doctor thought the high-tech12 mesh would help. But she also now feels like she was a guinea pig.
KEEL: We were the testers. There was no animal testing done. We were the animals.
FARMER: For devices in which a failure could obviously be life-threatening, regulators have required some sort of human testing. But medical author Jeanne Lenzer says the FDA now acknowledges that even some seemingly inert13 devices have caused major problems.
JEANNE LENZER: So we have things like metal-on-metal hips14, which, outside the human body, seem to function just fine. They put them in little machines. They rack them back and forth15. They don't break. They put them inside people, and something very different happens.
FARMER: Lenzer just wrote a scathing16 book about the device industry and says she was dumbfounded to find out how many devices never went through human testing like drugs do. That's in part due to an expedited approval process known as 510(k). It allows manufacturers to bypass many requirements by showing their product is very similar to something already in use.
LENZER: You just say your device is like an old device, and the old device was never tested nor was your device.
FARMER: In practice, sometimes the basis for a whole family tree of devices turns out to be defective17. Pelvic mesh is a good example and a product for which the FDA has started requiring some human testing. But manufacturers have pushed back against calls to bring regulation of medical devices in line with medication. Scott Whitaker of AdvaMed speaks for industry giants like Stryker, Johnson & Johnson and Medtronic.
SCOTT WHITAKER: Testing should be as complete and as thorough and as ethical18 and as appropriate as possible. But it doesn't all fit the same and can't all fit the same standard. Not every surgery to treat the same condition goes exactly the same way every time.
FARMER: The FDA declined to be interviewed for this story but plans to make changes to the process over the next few months. The agency is pushing back on manufacturers basing any new device on one that's more than 10 years old. And regulators say they'll do a better job of watching how devices do once they're on the market rather than relying on patients to report problems.
Michael Matheny, a professor who tracks medical devices at Vanderbilt University, approves of the FDA's incremental19 approach and calls it thoughtful. He says he wouldn't want the changes to spark hysteria over device failures.
MICHAEL MATHENY: It would really be unfortunate if patients wouldn't consider any medical devices at all to be used in their bodies. But I do think being aware that there is nothing without risk is also important.
MATHENY: Matheny notes, though, that in some ways, the risks are more profound than with medication. If the FDA recalls pills, a patient can at least stop taking them immediately. With a device, they're sort of stuck with it, at least for a while. And that's if a surgeon can even safely remove it. For NPR News, I'm Blake Farmer in Nashville.
(SOUNDBITE OF ERIC LAU'S "STAR TREKKING")
INSKEEP: This story is part of a reporting partnership20 between NPR, Nashville Public Radio and Kaiser Health News.
(SOUNDBITE OF ERIC LAU'S "STAR TREKKING")
1 intensify | |
vt.加强;变强;加剧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 scrutiny | |
n.详细检查,仔细观察 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 implants | |
n.(植入身体中的)移植物( implant的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 cosmetic | |
n.化妆品;adj.化妆用的;装门面的;装饰性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 surgically | |
adv. 外科手术上, 外科手术一般地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 spinal | |
adj.针的,尖刺的,尖刺状突起的;adj.脊骨的,脊髓的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 mesh | |
n.网孔,网丝,陷阱;vt.以网捕捉,啮合,匹配;vi.适合; [计算机]网络 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 strap | |
n.皮带,带子;v.用带扣住,束牢;用绷带包扎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 embedded | |
a.扎牢的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 chronic | |
adj.(疾病)长期未愈的,慢性的;极坏的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 high-tech | |
adj.高科技的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 inert | |
adj.无活动能力的,惰性的;迟钝的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 hips | |
abbr.high impact polystyrene 高冲击强度聚苯乙烯,耐冲性聚苯乙烯n.臀部( hip的名词复数 );[建筑学]屋脊;臀围(尺寸);臀部…的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 forth | |
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 scathing | |
adj.(言词、文章)严厉的,尖刻的;不留情的adv.严厉地,尖刻地v.伤害,损害(尤指使之枯萎)( scathe的现在分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 defective | |
adj.有毛病的,有问题的,有瑕疵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 ethical | |
adj.伦理的,道德的,合乎道德的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 incremental | |
adj.增加的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 partnership | |
n.合作关系,伙伴关系 | |
参考例句: |
|
|