-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
DAVID GREENE, HOST:
A top Iranian diplomat1 says his country has finished its retaliation2 against the United States. But it's worth listening carefully to the way he says it. A wider conflict between the two nations seems certain to continue.
The Iranian diplomat spoke3 to our colleague Steve Inskeep.
STEVE INSKEEP, HOST:
Majid Takht Ravanchi is Iran's ambassador to the United Nations. He spoke yesterday afternoon after his country launched missiles at the U.S. and its allies in Iraq. Iran called it retaliation for the U.S. drone strike in Iraq that killed Iranian general Qassem Soleimani.
As Ambassador Ravanchi came to the line in New York, news bulletins were flowing into our newsroom. In Baghdad, rockets were landing in the green zone near the U.S. Embassy. In Washington, a U.S. general said it was too early to tell if Iran's attacks were done. So we asked Ambassador Ravanchi to tell us.
Is Iran's retaliation against the United States finished?
MAJID TAKHT RAVANCHI: What we have said is that we took a measured, proportionate response to the terrorist assassination4 of our top general, Qassem Soleimani, last night. And as far as Iran is concerned, that action was concluded last night. So it depends on the United States. If the U.S. ventures to attack Iran again, definitely - proportionate response will be taken in response to that attack.
INSKEEP: OK. And you said that this concluded the retaliation. So if there are people concerned about other forms of attack, such as cyberattacks on U.S. interests or attacks by allies of Iran throughout the region, you're saying Iran would not endorse5 that. You are done.
TAKHT RAVANCHI: We are responsible for the actions that we take. We do not consider any sort of actions to be taken by others. The action was taken in accordance with our rights, which was proportionate and which was in response to the killing6 of Qassem Soleimani.
INSKEEP: When you said you don't take responsibility for the actions of others, are you saying it is entirely7 possible that Iraqi militias8 aligned9 with Iran could still lash10 out and Iran would not accept responsibility for what they're doing?
TAKHT RAVANCHI: I'm not suggesting anything in this regard. We are not responsible for any other people to do whatever they are going to do. So we are - as I said, I'm not suggesting anything to accept or to reject any sort of actions by others.
INSKEEP: Iran's supreme11 leader speaking after this retaliation said the next step was to push the United States out of the region, U.S. forces out of the region. How does Iran intend to do that?
TAKHT RAVANCHI: The people of the region are calling for the U.S. withdrawal12 from this neighborhood. Just look at the decision of the Iraqi Parliament. The Iraqi Parliament decided13 to say to the whole world that there is no place for the U.S. forces in Iraq. The American forces are not welcome in our neighborhood.
INSKEEP: Ambassador, you're correct that Iraq's Parliament did vote to expel forces from Iraq. But we should be clear; they didn't vote to expel the United States from Iraq. They voted to expel foreign forces from Iraq. And that leads us to note that General Soleimani, a member of Iran's military, was in Iraq when he was killed. What was he doing there?
TAKHT RAVANCHI: He was there to help the Iraqi armed forces to fight terrorists at the invitation of the Iraqi government. He was a popular figure not only in Iran but in the neighboring countries because he sacrificed a lot to preserve the territorial14 integrity and sovereignty of these countries.
INSKEEP: But wasn't General Soleimani the symbol of Iran's involvement in Iraq, which is something that Iraqis have been protesting against in recent months?
TAKHT RAVANCHI: You know, there are different voices within Iraq. But when he was murdered in Iraq, you saw the Iraqi people, how the Iraqi people reacted in anger. He sacrificed himself for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Iraq.
INSKEEP: As you must know, ambassador, the United States asserts that General Soleimani was plotting attacks against Americans, against the United States. Are you able to say if he was plotting such attacks?
TAKHT RAVANCHI: It is the duty of the United States to prove otherwise - I mean, to prove that he was, in fact, plotting to to kill Americans because...
INSKEEP: But I can also ask you. Was he plotting to kill Americans?
TAKHT RAVANCHI: No. He - as I said, he was there in order to help the Iraqi government to better, I mean, fight terrorists - pure and simple. It is...
GREENE: But let's be clear; Iran has defined the United States as terrorists. Was he or his organization planning attacks against the United States or its interests at the time?
TAKHT RAVANCHI: As I said, it is the duty of the United States to provide any evidence. The claim that he was about to kill American citizens cannot be acceptable to all, and it is not being accepted even by the members of Congress. So one cannot accept this claim from the U.S. administration that the threat was imminent15.
INSKEEP: One final thing, ambassador. President Trump16, in making his statement responding to Iran's retaliation, began with this sentence, quote, "as long as I am president of the United States, Iran will never be allowed to have a nuclear weapon." Iran has said it doesn't want a nuclear weapon. Is that a statement on which you can agree with the president?
TAKHT RAVANCHI: What I can tell you is that we are not seeking nuclear weapons. It is not in our interest to have nuclear weapons. It is against the religious verdict of our supreme leader. But we cannot accept the fact that the U.S., in contravention of NPT, in contravention of the JCPOA, the resolution 2231 of the U.N. Security Council, is acting17 to deprive Iran from its rights. So the question should be posed to the U.S. administration when they want to join the international community and act like a normal country in respecting international agreements.
INSKEEP: Majid Takht Ravanchi is Iran's ambassador to the United Nations. He's in New York. Ambassador, thanks so much.
TAKHT RAVANCHI: Thank you, sir.
INSKEEP: Now you here at the end how Iran turns U.S. rhetoric18 against the U.S. The United States accuses Iran of terrorism. Iran accuses the U.S. of terrorism. The U.S. has said it wants Iran to act like a normal nation. Iran's ambassador just made the same remark about the United States.
1 diplomat | |
n.外交官,外交家;能交际的人,圆滑的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 retaliation | |
n.报复,反击 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 assassination | |
n.暗杀;暗杀事件 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 endorse | |
vt.(支票、汇票等)背书,背署;批注;同意 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 killing | |
n.巨额利润;突然赚大钱,发大财 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 militias | |
n.民兵组织,民兵( militia的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 aligned | |
adj.对齐的,均衡的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 lash | |
v.系牢;鞭打;猛烈抨击;n.鞭打;眼睫毛 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 withdrawal | |
n.取回,提款;撤退,撤军;收回,撤销 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 territorial | |
adj.领土的,领地的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 imminent | |
adj.即将发生的,临近的,逼近的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 acting | |
n.演戏,行为,假装;adj.代理的,临时的,演出用的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 rhetoric | |
n.修辞学,浮夸之言语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|