-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
We used to have five major Wall Street firms, now we are down to two, and the meltdown of the three that we've seen, although Merrill by the way is not a meltdown. It was sold at a premium1 and a big number actually, which is, I think, has been underreported. But reason that at least two of these firms have melted down is because the model that has reigned2 on Wall Street for decades is really a very bad model, especially for shareholders3. These companies are focused on the employees and are run completely for the benefit of their employees and not the shareholders. Let me give you some examples.
Lehman had the leverage4 of around 30 times, er, its book value which was over 20 billion, so it had a 700-billon-dollar balance sheet (which) was lately reduced to around 600 billion when they were claiming to (quote) "Deleverage", so that's like having a mortgage on your house, that's a 97% mortgage, if the value of your house drops, inevitably5 in a bubble market in housing which is one of the reasons why these companies are in trouble, you lose all your equity6. That's what happened to these firms, they were enormously over-leveraged, and when the market turned against them, they lost all their book value which we just saw clearly was illustrated7 by what the banks decided8, ah, on Sunday, when they decided not to bail9 them out.
Um, but, when they get lucky, and interest rates drop which has happened almost all through Lehman's history, cause' it went public in 1994, the value of those assets swells10 enormously and they all look like geniuses, but eventually the market turns against them, the leverage bites the wrong way, and none of the huge pay that these companies are paying out to their employees ever comes back. Uh, and We saw pay-scales at Lehman and all these firms, they are unprecedented11 in and outside of Hollywood, maybe, or maybe hedge funds. And they were completely undeserved, because they were strictly12 making money because of luck and huge leverage.
1 premium | |
n.加付款;赠品;adj.高级的;售价高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 reigned | |
vi.当政,统治(reign的过去式形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 shareholders | |
n.股东( shareholder的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 leverage | |
n.力量,影响;杠杆作用,杠杆的力量 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 inevitably | |
adv.不可避免地;必然发生地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 equity | |
n.公正,公平,(无固定利息的)股票 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 illustrated | |
adj. 有插图的,列举的 动词illustrate的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 bail | |
v.舀(水),保释;n.保证金,保释,保释人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 swells | |
增强( swell的第三人称单数 ); 肿胀; (使)凸出; 充满(激情) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 unprecedented | |
adj.无前例的,新奇的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 strictly | |
adv.严厉地,严格地;严密地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|