模仿文本： True, one man's extraordinary rendition is another man's licence to torture, which in turn is a flagrant denial of a third man's human rights. But might the cross-border tangles of semantic barbed wire that snake through almost all human rights cases, from Tripoli to London to Strasbourg and back again, give the lie to the very concept itself? 

 

译文：诚然，一个人的蜜糖是另一个人的毒药，反过来而言，是对第三人人权的公然拒绝。但这种在各类人权案例中蜿蜒曲折的争论，从的黎波里(Tripoli)到伦敦(London)，再到斯特拉斯堡(Strasbourg)再回去，是否可能是对这一概念一次又一次的误读？