-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
NATO Quietly Marks 70th Anniversary
Foreign ministers from countries belonging to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization are gathering1 in Washington to mark the 70th anniversary of the military alliance.
NATO is one of the oldest common defense2 alliances of its kind, and one of the most successful. The group includes Britain, France and Germany, but also has added countries such as Turkey and Greece that are not near the Atlantic Ocean.
NATO was formed to be an alliance of Western nations that would balance the military power of the Soviet3 Union and its allies in Eastern Europe. After the former Soviet Union collapsed4 in 1991, some experts questioned what part the alliance would play in international security.
Since that time, NATO members have taken part in conflicts in Kosovo, Iraq and Afghanistan. NATO also has expanded to include countries that were once part of the Soviet bloc5. Croatia, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Hungary, Poland and Romania were formerly6 allied7 to the Soviet Union.
Criticisms of NATO
U.S. President Donald Trump8 has criticized the group, both as a presidential candidate and after taking office in 2017. Trump has said that many NATO members do not spend enough on defense to meet their commitments fully9 under the agreement.
He suggested that NATO may no longer be useful. He once called it “obsolete10.”
Trump’s criticism of the alliance has concerned European allies.
However, some U.S. officials have also been frustrated11 over European positions on some security issues affecting NATO. For example, Germany has planned an undersea gas pipeline12 with Russia. In addition, the U.S. is worried about Europeans' apparent lack of concern over security threats presented by China.
And some European members have sharply disagreed with the U.S. on expanding restrictions13 on Iran for its nuclear program and activities in the Middle East. They also have criticized the U.S. for withdrawing from a nuclear agreement with Russia – which, the U.S. says, Russia has not observed.
However, most foreign policy experts say NATO is a success.
Mark Simakovsky is with the Atlantic Council, a research group in Washington. He told VOA that NATO “has showcased an ability to adapt to change in the past” and it is dealing14 with issues like cyber warfare15 and spending more on defense.
Defense spending
Trump is not the first U.S. leader to call for NATO members to do more to defend their countries. President Barack Obama also pressed allies to spend more on defense. Other presidents have done so as well.
In 2014, NATO members agreed on spending what is equal to two percent of their economies on their militaries each year. Most have never reached that level. NATO’s 2018 report says 7 of its 29 member states reached the two percent spending promise.
Kurt Volker is director of the McCain Institute in Washington. He also served as the U.S. ambassador to NATO. Volker said defense spending shows a country’s commitment to its own security. He said such spending gives other NATO members confidence that the group can help defend that country.
Hans Jundnani is with the British research group Chatham House. He said Europe needs to do more to share the burden of common defense. In 2018, Britain supplied the most among European countries to the defense costs of the alliance.
Recently, a group of eight former British military and intelligence chiefs warned that Britain could drop from being a top military power unless it does more for its defense.
Central European countries continue to support the security guarantee that NATO provides. They note American support of military bases in the Black Sea area, the Baltic States and Poland.
On Monday, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg announced an agreement to spend $260 million for military storage in Poland.
I’m Mario Ritter Jr.
Words in This Story
bloc –n. a group of countries connected by a treaty or agreement
obsolete –adj. no longer used
adapt –v. to change in order to operate better or to be better able to meet needs
cyber –adj. related to computers and computer networks
confidence –n. the belief that someone has the ability to succeed at something
frustration16 –n. a feeling of annoyance at not being able to or being prevented from reaching some outcome
1 gathering | |
n.集会,聚会,聚集 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 Soviet | |
adj.苏联的,苏维埃的;n.苏维埃 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 collapsed | |
adj.倒塌的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 bloc | |
n.集团;联盟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 formerly | |
adv.从前,以前 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 allied | |
adj.协约国的;同盟国的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 fully | |
adv.完全地,全部地,彻底地;充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 obsolete | |
adj.已废弃的,过时的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 frustrated | |
adj.挫败的,失意的,泄气的v.使不成功( frustrate的过去式和过去分词 );挫败;使受挫折;令人沮丧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 pipeline | |
n.管道,管线 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 restrictions | |
约束( restriction的名词复数 ); 管制; 制约因素; 带限制性的条件(或规则) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 dealing | |
n.经商方法,待人态度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 warfare | |
n.战争(状态);斗争;冲突 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 frustration | |
n.挫折,失败,失效,落空 | |
参考例句: |
|
|