-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
On January 19, The New York Times will endorse1 a candidate seeking the presidential nomination2 of the Democratic Party.
The Democratic nominee3 is expected to face U.S. President Donald Trump4, the likely nominee of the Republican Party, in national elections this November.
The Times is one of most famous newspapers in the United States. It has been publishing endorsements6 of presidential candidates for around 150 years.
But this year, there will be something different. The endorsement5 process will take place in a very public way. Readers will have a chance to see and even hear how the paper's editorial team decided7 on which candidate to support.
Today, we will explore how and why U.S. newspapers endorse political candidates. We will also show you how endorsements are changing in the modern media landscape.
Endorsements
Newspaper endorsements are specific declarations or statements of support for a political candidate. This candidate could be seeking the presidency8 or any number of local political offices.
American newspapers have been endorsing9 U.S. presidential candidates for a long time. The New York Times, for example, has been endorsing presidential candidates since 1860. So says Kathleen Kingsbury, a deputy Editorial Page editor at The Times.
Endorsements appear in the editorial section, which gives opinions. The editorial section is separate from the news section.
Process
Newspapers come to their endorsement decisions in different ways, notes Danny Funt in the Columbia Journalism10 Review.
For example, the policies of The Tennessean newspaper, in Nashville, Tennessee, are set by the paper's editorial board. For an endorsement, Funt explains, five board members must reach a consensus11 decision.
Another paper, The Idaho Statesman, has a board that "consists of an editor, publisher, and five unpaid12 community volunteers."
"Some readers might imagine a staff meeting where everyone on staff casts a vote," Funt writes. "In reality," he adds, "we endorse" may reflect the opinion of the publisher alone, the opinion editor alone, a board of a few people, or a board of 16, as at The New York Times."
Public and private
To make its endorsement decisions, The Times has historically done ‘off-the-record' interviews with candidates. In other words, its editorial team met with candidates and asked them questions. The questions and answers were not released to the public.
This year will be the first time that The New York Times publishes written transcripts13 and videos of the interviews. Kathleen Kingsbury wrote on Twitter that the idea is to make the endorsement process more open.
But not everyone thinks this change is a good idea. Alex Tabarrok is an economist14 and a professor at George Mason University in Virginia. He notes that private, off-the-record discussions can be very valuable.
"A credible15 off-the-record system leaks a bit of honesty into the public domain16 and thus improves information overall," he wrote in the popular economics blog Marginal Revolution. He added, "Indeed, what possible value-added can the NYTimes make with a "transparent17," "public" process? Everything that will be said, has been said."
Do presidential endorsements matter?
Newspaper endorsements have been a subject of debate for some time.
Before the 2012 elections, for example, 17 large U.S. newspapers chose not to endorse a presidential candidate, according to National Public Radio (NPR).
David Haynes told NPR that endorsements tend "to undermine this whole idea of independence, and it really undermines this idea of being an honest broker18 of opinion." At the time, Haynes was the editorial page editor at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.
The 2016 election seemed to settle the question about whether newspaper endorsements influence American public opinion in presidential elections.
In October 2016, media company Politico noted19 "as of this writing, Clinton has more than 200 endorsements from daily and weekly newspapers in the United States." By comparison, Politico reported, Trump had only six endorsements.
Trump won the presidency the following month.
Yet many U.S. newspapers are expected to endorse presidential candidates this year. Their reasoning often goes beyond the idea of simply changing public opinion.
Chicago Tribune editorial page editor John McCormick noted that "swaying votes is only one reason for endorsing, and arguably not the most important."
He added that endorsements, "explain to the world what that publication is, what it advocates, how it thinks, what principles it holds dear."
Words in This Story
endorse – v. to publicly or officially say that you support or approve of (someone or something)
landscape – n. the qualities of a given situation or activity; a picture representing an area
section – n. a part of piece of something; a group within something larger
board – n. a committee; a group of people serving on the decision-making body of an organization
consensus – n. an idea or opinion that is shared by all the people in a group
reflect – v. to represent something
transparent – adj. honest and open; not secretive
credible – adj. able to be believed; reasonable to trust or believe
undermine – v. to lessen20 the effectiveness of something
sway – v. to influence; to cause to move back and forth
1 endorse | |
vt.(支票、汇票等)背书,背署;批注;同意 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 nomination | |
n.提名,任命,提名权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 nominee | |
n.被提名者;被任命者;被推荐者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 endorsement | |
n.背书;赞成,认可,担保;签(注),批注 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 endorsements | |
n.背书( endorsement的名词复数 );(驾驶执照上的)违章记录;(公开的)赞同;(通常为名人在广告中对某一产品的)宣传 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 presidency | |
n.总统(校长,总经理)的职位(任期) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 endorsing | |
v.赞同( endorse的现在分词 );在(尤指支票的)背面签字;在(文件的)背面写评论;在广告上说本人使用并赞同某产品 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 journalism | |
n.新闻工作,报业 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 consensus | |
n.(意见等的)一致,一致同意,共识 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 unpaid | |
adj.未付款的,无报酬的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 transcripts | |
n.抄本( transcript的名词复数 );转写本;文字本;副本 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 economist | |
n.经济学家,经济专家,节俭的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 credible | |
adj.可信任的,可靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 domain | |
n.(活动等)领域,范围;领地,势力范围 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 transparent | |
adj.明显的,无疑的;透明的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 broker | |
n.中间人,经纪人;v.作为中间人来安排 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 noted | |
adj.著名的,知名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 lessen | |
vt.减少,减轻;缩小 | |
参考例句: |
|
|