-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Should Buildings Where Deadly Shootings Happened Be Destroyed?
Deadly mass shootings have affected1 many American communities in recent years. These communities have had to face a decision: Do they keep the buildings where the bloodshed happened? Or do they tear them down?
One example recently happened in Parkland, Florida. That is where, in February 2018, a gunman killed 14 students and three adults and wounded 17 others after opening fire at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School. Earlier this month, heavy equipment began tearing down, or demolishing3, the three-story building where the victims died.
Community members in Parkland who spoke4 to the Associated Press (AP) said they felt the destruction of the building was a necessary step. Former student Bryan Lequerique said, “It’s something that we all need. It’s time to bring an end to this very hurtful chapter in everyone’s lives."Eric Garner5 is a broadcasting and film teacher at the school. He told the AP, “For 6? years we have been looking at this monument to mass murder that has been on campus every day.”
Other places have considered similar decisions.
Uvalde, Texas, is where a mass shooting in May 2022 claimed the lives of 19 children and two teachers. Officials there decided6 to destroy Robb Elementary School and build a new school. The community also chose to build a memorial to the shooting victims.
In Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, the Tree of Life synagogue was torn down to make room for a new spiritual center and memorial. The October 2018 shooting at the Jewish religious center killed 11 people. Other communities have made similar choices to demolish2 buildings where mass shootings happened.
But the Tops Friendly Markets in Buffalo7, New York, and the Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston, South Carolina, both reopened after mass killings8. Both places experienced race-linked mass shootings.
Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado, still stands. The school’s library, however, where much of the bloodshed happened, was replaced. The Columbine shooting in 1999 left 15 people dead.
“Finding a balance between its function as a high school and the need for memorialization has been a long process,” former Columbine student Riley Burkhart wrote earlier this year in an essay looking back at the shooting.
Experts say such decisions involve more than just emotion and tragedy. Sometimes, it is simply a question of resources; not all school districts can afford to tear down and rebuild. And sometimes it is about not wanting to give those who might support the shooter a place to center their attention.
Daniel Fountain is a professor of history at Meredith College in North Carolina. He told the AP he thinks it is a good idea to tear down buildings that could be used by individuals who might support the shooters or their cause and to somehow “celebrate” the deaths.
Another reason why people might want to destroy such buildings has to do with ideas about mental health.
"There are changing norms about things like trauma9 and closure that are at play that today encourage the notion of demolishing these spaces," said Timothy Recuber. He is a sociologist10 at Smith College in Massachusetts.
To some people, keeping a building standing11 can send a message of defiance12. To them, leaving a structure standing does not mean the community is accepting a tragedy. Instead, it can show that people are ready to move on.
But to others, the possibility that people could face trauma again by seeing the building is most important. Why, for example, should a building where people met violent deaths be left standing?
Jennifer Talarico is a psychology13 professor at Lafayette College in Pennsylvania. She has studied how people form personal memories of public events. She noted14 that, since these decisions can be complex and involve different groups, they are often not easy to make.
“It’s not a simple choice of should we knock it down or renovate15 or let it be," Talarico said.
Words in This Story
story – n. one floor of a building
function – n. the purpose of something or someone
essay –n. a moderately short piece of writing expressing a person’s thoughts about one subject
trauma – n. severe shock caused by a bad experience
encourage – v. to talk or behave in a way that gives someone confidence to do something
defy – v. to refuse to obey someone or something
renovate – v. repair or decorate a building that is old or in bad condition
1 affected | |
adj.不自然的,假装的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 demolish | |
v.拆毁(建筑物等),推翻(计划、制度等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 demolishing | |
v.摧毁( demolish的现在分词 );推翻;拆毁(尤指大建筑物);吃光 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 garner | |
v.收藏;取得 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 buffalo | |
n.(北美)野牛;(亚洲)水牛 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 killings | |
谋杀( killing的名词复数 ); 突然发大财,暴发 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 trauma | |
n.外伤,精神创伤 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 sociologist | |
n.研究社会学的人,社会学家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 standing | |
n.持续,地位;adj.永久的,不动的,直立的,不流动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 defiance | |
n.挑战,挑衅,蔑视,违抗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 psychology | |
n.心理,心理学,心理状态 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 noted | |
adj.著名的,知名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 renovate | |
vt.更新,革新,刷新 | |
参考例句: |
|
|