-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
By Meredith Buel
Washington
24 January 2007
President Bush used his State of the Union address to call on members of Congress to support his new strategy for Iraq, which includes sending more than 20,000 additional U.S. troops in an effort to quell1 raging sectarian violence in Baghdad and fight insurgents2 in al-Anbar province. Some Middle East analysts3 are questioning the plan, and many Democratic and some Republican members of Congress are opposed to adding more American soldiers to the fight. VOA correspondent Meredith Buel has more in this background report from Washington.
President Bush delivers his State of the Union address on Capitol Hill in Washington
President Bush says his plan demands new commitments from the Iraqi government while giving U.S. forces in Iraq the reinforcements they need to complete their mission.
Mr. Bush says America's goal is to build a democratic Iraq that upholds the rule of law, respects the rights of its people, provides them security and is an ally in the war on terror.
In his State of the Union address the president urged members of Congress to support his strategy, which he says can turn events in Iraq toward victory.
"We went into this largely united, in our assumptions and in our convictions," said Mr. Bush. "And whatever you voted for, you did not vote for failure. Our country is pursuing a new strategy in Iraq and I ask you to give it a chance to work. And I ask you to support our troops in the field and those on their way."
While Congress is debating non-binding resolutions opposing the troop surge, this is not expected to stop the president's plan to send the additional troops to Iraq.
Lawrence Korb, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, questions whether additional soldiers can suppress the sectarian violence in Baghdad.
"We have seen when we have surged twice in the last six months the violence and death of Americans and Iraqis have increased dramatically," he said. "An increased surge will only create more targets, put more American lives at risk, increase Iraqi dependence4 on the United States, further undermine the precarious5 readiness of our ground forces. If we send all the troops that are supposed to go we will have no strategic reserve left in the United States."
A U.S. soldier in Baghdad
President Bush argues that his latest plan differs from previous operations because of commitments from Iraq's political leaders.
Those promises include providing armed forces as part of the effort to bring security to Baghdad, sharing oil revenue, spending billions to rebuild the country and holding local elections.
A Middle East specialist with the International Crisis Group, Robert Malley, expresses concerns about the reliability6 of Iraqi security forces.
"On the issue of training I think one of the big misconceptions from the beginning of the war is this notion that by training the Iraqis in the abstract is going to make a difference," he explained. "It is a question of loyalty7 and allegiance that matters and if they are loyal to their group or to their militia8 it doesn't matter how well trained they are. That is why so often trained troops have not performed."
Democratic Congressman9 John Murtha, a major critic of the Iraq conflict, set off a political firestorm when he first spoke10 out against the war in November 2005.
Murtha says there is no military solution to the hostilities11 in Iraq.
"Historically, whether it is India, Algeria or Afghanistan, foreign occupations do not work," he said. "In fact, they incite12 civil unrest. Our military remains13 the greatest military in the world, but there are limits to its ability to control a population that considers them as occupiers."
Retired14 General Richard Myers, a former chairman of the Joint15 Chiefs of Staff, believes more troops can make a difference on the streets of Baghdad.
Myers says because the president's plan is multi-dimensional, it has a better chance of success.
"The thing I like about the strategy is that it is not just a troop increase, there is also a political dimension where the Iraqi government is held accountable and there is an economic dimension," he explained. "Those have to go hand in hand. To often we focus on purely16 the military dimension of this problem. It is much more than that."
Current U.S. military commanders have endorsed17 the president's new strategy, although no one is saying how long the troop surge will last.
1 quell | |
v.压制,平息,减轻 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 insurgents | |
n.起义,暴动,造反( insurgent的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 analysts | |
分析家,化验员( analyst的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 dependence | |
n.依靠,依赖;信任,信赖;隶属 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 precarious | |
adj.不安定的,靠不住的;根据不足的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 reliability | |
n.可靠性,确实性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 loyalty | |
n.忠诚,忠心 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 militia | |
n.民兵,民兵组织 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 Congressman | |
n.(美)国会议员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 hostilities | |
n.战争;敌意(hostility的复数);敌对状态;战事 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 incite | |
v.引起,激动,煽动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 retired | |
adj.隐退的,退休的,退役的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 joint | |
adj.联合的,共同的;n.关节,接合处;v.连接,贴合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 purely | |
adv.纯粹地,完全地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 endorsed | |
vt.& vi.endorse的过去式或过去分词形式v.赞同( endorse的过去式和过去分词 );在(尤指支票的)背面签字;在(文件的)背面写评论;在广告上说本人使用并赞同某产品 | |
参考例句: |
|
|