-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Washington
18 September 2007
The U.S. Senate this week is considering whether to restrict President Bush's conduct of the war in Iraq. It is a long awaited showdown between Mr. Bush and Democrats1 who say they want to impose firm timetables for the withdrawal2 of U.S. troops. While a president and Congress share war powers under the U.S. Constitution, some experts say the advantage now favors the chief executive. VOA's Jim Fry takes a closer look.
The commander-in-chief on Friday joined Marines for lunch at a military base near Washington, D.C.
President Bush sought the company of soldiers the same week that his top general in Iraq -- David Petreaus -- and his chief diplomat3 there -- Ambassador Ryan Crocker -- proposed to Congess modest troop reductions. They argued against rapid withdrawal.
Even though Mr. Bush urged Congress to agree to the general's plan, Democrats in the U.S. Senate said they would not. Senator Harry4 Reid leads the opposition5 party. He said, "There will be amendments6 offered to change the course of the war."
"It's futile," says University of Virginia scholar Larry Sabato. He says because Democrats hold only a one vote majority, they will not win the two-thirds they need to force Senate action.
Many political experts say voters expressed their impatience7 in 2006 with Mr. Bush's conduct of the war. Yet just two months later, Mr. Bush ordered more soldiers into Iraq.
Sabato proposes the Constitution be changed to give Congress the power to end any war by simple majority vote. "We need to rearrange these powers and bring Congress back into the equation after a war begins."
The Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war, as it did in 1941 after Japan bombed Pearl Harbor ,a U.S. Naval8 base on Hawaii. But since Franklin Roosevelt, theU.S. president at the time, no president has sought a formal declaration.
Sabato says the House and Senate should be given the power to end military action by a simple majority vote.
Charles Stevenson, Johns Hopkins University Professor disagree. "I don't think you need it," he said. Stevenson served two decades as a defense9 and foreign policy adviser11 to the Senate. He argues that Congress is powerful enough to reign10 in a president.
In 1973, near the end of the Vietnam War, Congress voted to stop bombing ordered by President Richard Nixon. "It cut off the money. President Nixon obeyed that."
After a U.S. helicopter was downed in Somalia in a raid that left 18 U.S. soldiers dead, Stevenson says President Bill Clinton agreed to a congressional limit on U.S. involvement. "Presidents have accepted Congress acting12 on the power of the purse, but that's a pretty drastic action and I'm not sure the anti-war folks are anywhere near the votes they need to pass something like that."
The president ordered U.S. troops into Iraq after the Congress authorized13 military action five years ago. Congress has taken no such vote since. And unless anti-war senators can win more votes, Mr. Bush will continue running the war as he sees fit.
1 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 withdrawal | |
n.取回,提款;撤退,撤军;收回,撤销 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 diplomat | |
n.外交官,外交家;能交际的人,圆滑的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 harry | |
vt.掠夺,蹂躏,使苦恼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 opposition | |
n.反对,敌对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 amendments | |
(法律、文件的)改动( amendment的名词复数 ); 修正案; 修改; (美国宪法的)修正案 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 impatience | |
n.不耐烦,急躁 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 naval | |
adj.海军的,军舰的,船的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 reign | |
n.统治时期,统治,支配,盛行;v.占优势 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 adviser | |
n.劝告者,顾问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 acting | |
n.演戏,行为,假装;adj.代理的,临时的,演出用的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 authorized | |
a.委任的,许可的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|