-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Many analysts1 are now calling the fighting in Afghanistan, 'President Obama's War'. In this report from Washington, Senior Correspondent André de Nesnera spoke2 with three former senior US government officials about the Afghan conflict.
André de Nesnera | Washington 16 December 2009
At Fort Carson, Colorado U.S. Army soldiers await departure for their deployment3 to Afghanistan (File)
"Persuading the Pakistani government, which it continues to be somewhat shaky, to clean up the situation in the border and the tribal4 areas and in Baluchistan - it's not going to be easy, but it is essential."
In a major speech outlining his Afghan strategy in early December, President Barack Obama said he would send an additional 30,000 troops to that country. He also said he will begin the withdrawal5 of U.S. troops in July 2011, beginning the handover of security responsibility to Afghan forces.
Former Secretary of State [1992] Lawrence Eagleburger agrees with the deployment of U.S. forces.
"The 30,000 troops is a good idea. But to announce when you are going to start pulling them out is not a very good idea," said Eagleburger. "It tells the opposition6 we are not really intent on winning. And if we cannot win this thing by a date certain, we are going to leave, even though at the same time we say we could change that if we had to - I think the basic point is it's a sign of weakness and therefore it is not a smart idea," he said.
Former CIA Director [1973] and Secretary of Defense7 [1973-75] James Schlesinger also questions the July 2011 date to begin the withdrawal of U.S. forces.
"I hope that that is simply a gesture to the anti-war element in the Democratic Party. It may make them happy, but it probably makes the Taliban happy at the same time and causes great consternation8 in Afghanistan, in Pakistan, amongst our allies," he said.
A US Marine9 fires on Taliban positions from a rooftop in the village of Dahaneh n the Helmand Province of Afghanistan. (File)
One of the key elements of President Obama's Afghan strategy is for President Hamid Karzai to fight corruption11 within his government.
Former National Security Adviser12 [1974-77; 1989-93; retired13 Air Force] General Brent Scowcroft says it is very difficult to force President Karzai to fight corruption.
"We cannot force. But it seems to me that he has some pretty clear choices to make," said Scowcroft. "If he is to survive and sustain himself, he needs our strategy to succeed. It can only succeed if he performs better than before. So it seems to me he has incentives14 perhaps he didn't realize before," he said.
Lawrence Eagleburger is even more blunt.
"The point is that there is no way in the end that we can force him to be less than what he is and what he is is a corrupt10 politician," he said.
All three former senior officials say Pakistan's role in the Afghan equation is essential.
Former Defense Secretary James Schlesinger:
"It is simply crucial. As long as the insurgents15 can move back and forth16 across the border, it is very hard to snuff out the Taliban in Afghanistan," he said. "Persuading the Pakistani government, which it continues to be somewhat shaky, to clean up the situation in the border and the tribal areas and in Baluchistan - it's not going to be easy, but it is essential," he added.
All three former officials believe it will be difficult to get the Europeans to contribute more troops to the Afghan effort, despite the fact that they pledged 7,000 more soldiers.
Former Secretary of State Lawrence Eagleburger:
"Their support for us is tenuous17 at best. I do not think there is any way to get them to do more," he said. "The British will do everything they can. It is going to be a very tough game to try to get the Europeans to contribute anything. It's an almost hopeless task right now. We will get a little bit of support from the Europeans and from the European Union, but it would not be much and it certainly would not be sufficient to be a telling blow against the terrorists," said Eagleburger.
Many experts, including General Scowcroft, believe that the Europeans can contribute more to non-combat operations - that is, working with local authorities to improve the every day life of Afghans. Many analysts say that part may be as important, if not more, than the combat operations against the Taliban.
1 analysts | |
分析家,化验员( analyst的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 deployment | |
n. 部署,展开 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 tribal | |
adj.部族的,种族的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 withdrawal | |
n.取回,提款;撤退,撤军;收回,撤销 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 opposition | |
n.反对,敌对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 consternation | |
n.大为吃惊,惊骇 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 marine | |
adj.海的;海生的;航海的;海事的;n.水兵 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 corrupt | |
v.贿赂,收买;adj.腐败的,贪污的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 corruption | |
n.腐败,堕落,贪污 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 adviser | |
n.劝告者,顾问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 retired | |
adj.隐退的,退休的,退役的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 incentives | |
激励某人做某事的事物( incentive的名词复数 ); 刺激; 诱因; 动机 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 insurgents | |
n.起义,暴动,造反( insurgent的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 forth | |
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 tenuous | |
adj.细薄的,稀薄的,空洞的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|