-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
The Fernald wilderness1 preserve today, 21 years after the nuclear weapons plant closed for good.
The Fernald Preserve in Ohio is home to deer, turkeys, muskrat2 and many other creatures, including 200 species of birds.
However, not too long ago, the same site housed a facility that processed uranium ore for weapons. The plant spewed radioactive uranium dust into the air and contaminated the local water supply.
Since the plant's closing in 1989, the former nuclear weapons site has traveled a dangerous and expensive path to recovery.
The Fernald Feed Materials Processing Center secretly processed uranium ore for weapons plants elsewhere in the United States.
Secret plant
For years, most residents of southwestern Ohio thought the Fernald Feed Materials Processing Center was a Purina dog food plant.
The name and the distinctive3 red and white checkered4 water tower may have been intended to give just that impression. But for nearly four decades, the facility was actually processing uranium ore and feeding it to weapons plants elsewhere in the country.
The plant operated around the clock, seven days week, employing several thousand people over its four decades. Engineer Cathy Glassmeyer started working at Fernald in 1985, just a few years before it closed. She says it was a great place to work. The plant's employees were a close-knit community, drawn5 together by the secrecy6 surrounding their work and pride in their contributions to the nation's defense7.
"It did have a good culture of family almost. Some people had worked here their whole lives," says Glassmeyer. "There were a lot of people who met and got married from here. And everybody ate in the company cafeteria, from the company presidents on down to the lowliest porters who mopped the floors."
The containment8 mound9 in the background, which looms10 over the preserve, contains entombed A darker side to Fernald culture
Operated by for-profit companies under government contract, production was the top priority.
Workplace safety and environmental concerns seemed to have been secondary concerns at best. As an example, Glassmeyer points to a lack of documentation in the facility.
"We found out that none of the valves in the building had numbers, none of the lines had identifying labels, because all of the old guys who worked here knew what everything was. Well, at that time, turning over to a new generation, we were all coming in, going, 'We don't want to guess.'"
Treated in an equally cavalier fashion was the 340,000 metric tons of radioactive waste generated over the years by the uranium extraction process.
It was stored right on the property.
"It had to go somewhere," says Jane Powell, current manager of the Fernald site. "It started out being disposed of in unlined pits, then lined pits, then - when that wasn't possible - it was put into drums."
Shocking discovery
Fernald's waste emitted relatively11 low levels of radiation. But the facility was also storing highly radioactive waste from other weapons plants. It was this more dangerous waste that first brought Fernald to the attention of local environmental activist12 David Fankhauser.
Fankhauser is a professor of biology at the nearby University of Cincinnati.
He recalls doing a radiation survey around the perimeter13 of the plant with two members of the Sierra Club. "I had what's called a scintillation counter that detects gamma radiation, and as we drove along the road, I took readings and plotted how far we had gone and there was a clear, dramatic increase in radiation at one point."
What Fankhauser detected in the early 1980s turned out to be nuclear waste created 40 years earlier as part of the Manhattan Project, America's World War II drive to build an atomic bomb.
Fankhauser says when he published his findings, the local press scoffed14 at his concerns. But soon after, it was revealed that the plant was also spewing radioactive uranium dust into the air, and contaminating the local water supply.
Then, he says, the community took notice and the press did an abrupt15 about-face.
"Well, suddenly, it was like somebody threw the switch," Fankhauser says. "And I'll never forget that first Enquirer17 [local newspaper] headline, talking about radioactive releases from Fernald and finally looking at what were clearly dangers to the genetic18 material of people that lived in that neighborhood."
Fernald was closed in 1989, and the more dangerous, high-level waste - about 20 percent of the total - was shipped to disposal sites in Western states.
The remaining 80 percent was entombed in a 720 meter long, grass-covered mound, 20 meters high, that runs along one edge of the property. Surrounded by a stone moat and razor-topped fencing, the mound is a series of clay-lined containment cells. Inside the cells are 40 years worth of nuclear waste, contaminated soil and the remains19 of Fernald's 300 buildings.
The rest of the 420-hectare site makes up the nature preserve.
The Fernald site was covered with concrete, buildings and tanks.
Uncertain future
When the Fernald plant closed, its future development was unclear.
Government officials decided20 to open the question of how to retire the plant to public input21. They even developed a game for local residents to play: an exercise that balanced time, resources and ecological22 concerns against possible outcomes.
Site manager Jane Powell explains that people recognized it would likely have proved impossible to make the land habitable again, free of all contamination. So the final solution was a compromise.
"The former Feed Materials Production Center was cleaned to a standard, or remediated to a standard, to allow an undeveloped park with an emphasis on wildlife," says Powell.
New mission
As part of the compromise, the Fernald workers were retrained to perform the cleanup.
Engineer Cathy Glassmeyer admits her fellow Cold War warriors23 were a bit skeptical24 at first. "When you're sitting here looking at [400 hectares], every bit of which is covered with concrete and buildings and drums and pumps and tanks and all that, it's very hard to get your imagination wrapped around what it's going to look like when all that's gone."
In the end, Glassmeyer says, the Fernald workers took as much pride in the cleanup as they had participating in the nation's defense. They came to see ecological restoration as an equally valuable contribution.
"Retirees come through here all the time," she says, adding that they're all amazed at how well the restoration worked. "[They say,] 'Wow, look what we made. We made something nice now as opposed to back when we made uranium.'"
Department of Energy
The Fernald Preserve in Ohio is home to deer, turkeys, muskrat and many other creatures, including 200 species of birds.
Turning back the clock
The site has been returned to the mixed woodlands and prairie that existed in this corner of Ohio when European explorers first arrived.
Powell explains they had some guidance in choosing the correct plants. "In 1819, there was a land survey done and they noted25 things like the trees that were here, the grasses that were growing, and we based our seed mixes and our planting on that."
Fernald doesn't look like untamed 19th century wilderness yet. Still, the transformation26 is quite remarkable27. And apparently28, the local wildlife agrees.
Students from nearby Northwest High School have been participating in wildlife studies here for the last two years. Their teacher, Jeff Davis, is amazed at how quickly wildlife returned to site.
"I had a friend come in from Belize about a month ago," he reports, "and I brought him out here, and we're standing29 in a field watching an adult bald eagle soaring overhead and there are Black Necked Stilts30 and Wilson's Phalaropes. Two hundred species of birds on one [400 hectare] parcel of property on Southwest Ohio is pretty impressive," he concludes.
Davis describes himself as a born pessimist31, especially where environmental issues are concerned, but he's clearly impressed by what the Fernald restoration has accomplished32. "What I have learned from here is, if the time is spent to do it correctly, and especially if the money is available to do it correctly, things can change. Things can reverse. Things can definitely heal and things can get better."
It took ten years and 4.4 billion dollars to begin that healing process. The product of compromise, the Fernald Preserve is far from an ideal solution, but it is one community's solution for pushing the Cold War firmly into the past.
1 wilderness | |
n.杳无人烟的一片陆地、水等,荒漠 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 muskrat | |
n.麝香鼠 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 distinctive | |
adj.特别的,有特色的,与众不同的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 checkered | |
adj.有方格图案的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 drawn | |
v.拖,拉,拔出;adj.憔悴的,紧张的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 secrecy | |
n.秘密,保密,隐蔽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 containment | |
n.阻止,遏制;容量 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 mound | |
n.土墩,堤,小山;v.筑堤,用土堆防卫 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 looms | |
n.织布机( loom的名词复数 )v.隐约出现,阴森地逼近( loom的第三人称单数 );隐约出现,阴森地逼近 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 relatively | |
adv.比较...地,相对地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 activist | |
n.活动分子,积极分子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 perimeter | |
n.周边,周长,周界 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 scoffed | |
嘲笑,嘲弄( scoff的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 abrupt | |
adj.突然的,意外的;唐突的,鲁莽的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 outrage | |
n.暴行,侮辱,愤怒;vt.凌辱,激怒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 enquirer | |
寻问者,追究者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 genetic | |
adj.遗传的,遗传学的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 input | |
n.输入(物);投入;vt.把(数据等)输入计算机 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 ecological | |
adj.生态的,生态学的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 warriors | |
武士,勇士,战士( warrior的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 skeptical | |
adj.怀疑的,多疑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 noted | |
adj.著名的,知名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 transformation | |
n.变化;改造;转变 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 remarkable | |
adj.显著的,异常的,非凡的,值得注意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 apparently | |
adv.显然地;表面上,似乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 standing | |
n.持续,地位;adj.永久的,不动的,直立的,不流动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 stilts | |
n.(支撑建筑物高出地面或水面的)桩子,支柱( stilt的名词复数 );高跷 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 pessimist | |
n.悲观者;悲观主义者;厌世 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 accomplished | |
adj.有才艺的;有造诣的;达到了的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|