-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Democrats1 Change US Senate Rules on Obama Nominees2
CAPITOL HILL — The Democratic-led U.S. Senate has voted to change the rules for confirming presidential nominees and strip the ability of minority Republicans to block them. The move is designed to reduce gridlock on Capitol Hill and smooth the functioning of government, but, it could further scuttle3 bipartisanship and open the door to a reshaping of America’s legislative5 process.
Filibusters7 allow the Senate’s minority party to set a 60-vote threshold to advance almost any business before the 100-member body. As a blocking maneuver8, it is highly effective.
Majority Democrats say Republicans have overused the filibuster6 when it comes to confirming executive branch and judicial9 nominees. Senate Majority Leader Harry10 Reid:
“Republican obstruction11 has become endemic in the Senate over the last five years, grinding the work of this institution to a halt, threatening the integrity of this institution, and damaging our country," said Reid.
Thursday, Democrats forced a series of mostly party line votes to change the rules governing the chamber12. Now, simple majority votes will suffice to confirm federal nominees other than Supreme13 Court justices. Republicans like Chuck Grassley objected.
“This is about a naked power grab, and nothing more than a power grab. This is about the other side not getting everything they want, when they want it," said Grassley.
Not so, according to President Barack Obama.
“All too often we have seen a single senator or a handful of senators choose to abuse arcane14 procedural tactics to unilaterally block bipartisan compromises, or to prevent well-qualified patriotic15 Americans from filling critical positions in public service in our system of government," said President Obama.
Republicans warn that Democrats will regret Thursday’s vote the next time they are in the minority. Curbing the filibuster through a partisan4 vote had been called the “nuclear option,” given its potential to rile Republicans and further poison bipartisanship.
Analyst16 John Fortier sees long-term implications:
“The House [of Representatives] you can get something done if you have a one vote majority. The Senate, because of the filibuster rule and some other features, has usually been a place where you had to have a more bipartisan coalition17. I think this is the beginning of changes to make the Senate much more like the House, to make it much more a majoritarian institution," said Fortier.
Those changes can be seen as a needed curtailment18 of legislative abuse - or as an ill-advised alteration19 of the very fabric20 of American democracy.
1 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 nominees | |
n.被提名者,被任命者( nominee的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 scuttle | |
v.急赶,疾走,逃避;n.天窗;舷窗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 partisan | |
adj.党派性的;游击队的;n.游击队员;党徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 legislative | |
n.立法机构,立法权;adj.立法的,有立法权的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 filibuster | |
n.妨碍议事,阻挠;v.阻挠 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 filibusters | |
n.掠夺兵( filibuster的名词复数 );暴兵;(用冗长的发言)阻挠议事的议员;会议妨碍行为v.阻碍或延宕国会或其他立法机构通过提案( filibuster的第三人称单数 );掠夺 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 maneuver | |
n.策略[pl.]演习;v.(巧妙)控制;用策略 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 judicial | |
adj.司法的,法庭的,审判的,明断的,公正的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 harry | |
vt.掠夺,蹂躏,使苦恼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 obstruction | |
n.阻塞,堵塞;障碍物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 chamber | |
n.房间,寝室;会议厅;议院;会所 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 arcane | |
adj.神秘的,秘密的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 patriotic | |
adj.爱国的,有爱国心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 analyst | |
n.分析家,化验员;心理分析学家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 coalition | |
n.结合体,同盟,结合,联合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 curtailment | |
n.缩减,缩短 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 alteration | |
n.变更,改变;蚀变 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 fabric | |
n.织物,织品,布;构造,结构,组织 | |
参考例句: |
|
|