-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
A new study lights up the shadows
GONE are the days when multinationals4 could book bribes5 paid in far-flung countries as a tax-deductible expense. These days would-be palm-greasers have to contend with ever-tougher enforcement of old laws, such as America's Foreign Corrupt6 Practices Act of 1977, and a raft of new ones in countries from Britain to Brazil.
As policing is stepped up, however, much about the practice of bribery remains7 murky8. The OECD's first report on the subject, published on December 2nd, sheds some light by analysing more than 400 international bribery cases that have been brought since the anti-bribery convention of this group of mostly rich countries came into force in 1999.
Some findings confirm what was known or suspected. The most bribe1 riddled9 sectors10 are oil, gas, mining, construction and transport. At the other end of the spectrum11, financial services and retailing12 are fairly clean. Most bribes go to managers of state-owned companies, followed by customs officials. And America leads the enforcement pack, with 128 cases that resulted in sanctions (see chart).
But the report also undermines some common beliefs. Bribery is not a sin of rogue13 employees or poor countries. In 53% of cases payments were made or authorised by corporate14 managers (and in 12% of them by the chief executive). More than 40% of the time, the bribe-taking official was in a developed country (though this figure is probably inflated15 by rich countries' greater willingness to criminalise bribery and co-operate with cross-border investigations16). Authorities are often alerted by firms themselves: those that co-operate quickly are often treated leniently17.
Nevertheless, the cleanest countries tend to be rich, and the dirtiest poor. Four of the five best-performing countries in Transparency International's latest corruption-perceptions index, also published this week, were Nordic. The worst were North Korea and Somalia. (Interestingly, China's score slipped despite a recent high-profile campaign against corrupt officials.)
The cost of bribery varies by industry. Builders pay a modest average of 4% of a transaction's value; extractive companies a hefty 21%. Add to that the rising costs of paying penalties and conducting internal probes—these cost Siemens, for example, $2.4 billion when it was mired18 in a graft scandal a few years ago—and bribery starts to look bad not just for reputations, but also for bottom lines.
Even for firms that are not caught, the business case for bribery is far from clear. A 2013 study by Harvard Business School and America's National Bureau of Economic Research found that what bribe-paying companies gain in higher sales in corrupt countries, they lose in lower profit margins19. According to the OECD, the average bribe costs 11% of the transaction's value and 35% of associated profits.
Nevertheless, graft remains alive and well. One of the OECD report's authors told a conference this week that 390 cases are under investigation—not far short of the total number resolved since the OECD convention took effect 15 years ago. The number of cases concluded each year has dipped since a peak in 2011 as the time taken to complete investigations and prosecutions20 has climbed to more than seven years, from under four in 2008.
One possible reason for the slowdown is that bribery techniques are growing more sophisticated and thus harder to detect. Another could be the widespread use of opaque21 corporate structures to conceal22 wrongdoing. These can be devilishly difficult to unpick, especially when they are stacked in several layers and fronted by nominee23 directors. Anonymous24 shell companies and other intermediaries—sometimes dressed up as “consultants”—were used to move or to house payments in more than 70% of cases. The OECD report underlines the importance of cracking down on the misuse25 of shell companies and enforcing more clarity over ownership of companies and trusts, whether through accessible corporate registers—a move being pushed by some G20 countries, led by Britain—or by tougher regulation of service providers that do the paperwork for new firms.
1 bribe | |
n.贿赂;v.向…行贿,买通 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 bribery | |
n.贿络行为,行贿,受贿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 graft | |
n.移植,嫁接,艰苦工作,贪污;v.移植,嫁接 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 multinationals | |
跨国公司( multinational的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 bribes | |
n.贿赂( bribe的名词复数 );向(某人)行贿,贿赂v.贿赂( bribe的第三人称单数 );向(某人)行贿,贿赂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 corrupt | |
v.贿赂,收买;adj.腐败的,贪污的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 murky | |
adj.黑暗的,朦胧的;adv.阴暗地,混浊地;n.阴暗;昏暗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 riddled | |
adj.布满的;充斥的;泛滥的v.解谜,出谜题(riddle的过去分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 sectors | |
n.部门( sector的名词复数 );领域;防御地区;扇形 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 spectrum | |
n.谱,光谱,频谱;范围,幅度,系列 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 retailing | |
n.零售业v.零售(retail的现在分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 rogue | |
n.流氓;v.游手好闲 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 corporate | |
adj.共同的,全体的;公司的,企业的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 inflated | |
adj.(价格)飞涨的;(通货)膨胀的;言过其实的;充了气的v.使充气(于轮胎、气球等)( inflate的过去式和过去分词 );(使)膨胀;(使)通货膨胀;物价上涨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 investigations | |
(正式的)调查( investigation的名词复数 ); 侦查; 科学研究; 学术研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 leniently | |
温和地,仁慈地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 mired | |
abbr.microreciprocal degree 迈尔德(色温单位)v.深陷( mire的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 margins | |
边( margin的名词复数 ); 利润; 页边空白; 差数 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 prosecutions | |
起诉( prosecution的名词复数 ); 原告; 实施; 从事 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 opaque | |
adj.不透光的;不反光的,不传导的;晦涩的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 conceal | |
v.隐藏,隐瞒,隐蔽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 nominee | |
n.被提名者;被任命者;被推荐者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 anonymous | |
adj.无名的;匿名的;无特色的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 misuse | |
n.误用,滥用;vt.误用,滥用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|