-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Lexington
The immigrant numbers game
Why Barack Obama's partial amnesty won't be reversed
SOMETIMES the hardest questions come from friendly crowds. Barack Obama on December 9th made a foray into the heartland to promote his plan to shield millions of undocumented migrants from deportation1. He chose to speak inNashville, a once-sleepy (if tuneful) city that has seen its foreign-born population roughly double in a decade. That reflects a broad trend: millions of migrants, most of them Hispanic, have moved to the South and Midwest in recent years, flocking to small towns and rural counties that last saw hefty in-migration in the days of crinolines, carpet-bags and spats2.
After a thoughtful speech defending immigration (“It keeps us young, and it keeps us invigorated,” he said), Mr Obama took questions.Nashville's Hispanics love you, began his first questioner. Then came a tougher query3. If the next president scraps4 the new executive action, will those who use it to seek temporary work and residency papers be first in line for deportation? Mr Obama's answer, simplified, was: there's safety in numbers.
A permanent immigration law passed by Congress would be much better, the president said—but even temporary papers should be politically hard to reverse. He added an interesting caveat5, though. Local governments, churches and community groups need to sign up more than “just a few people in a few pockets”. Mr Obama's answer is revealing. Republicans inWashington,DCmay be enraged6 at being side-stepped by Mr Obama, and seem set to stall any congressional action on immigration until he is out of office in 2017. But for all that, the president is wagering7 that the country at large realises that something must be done to regularise a migrant population that they see all around them, at school gates in conservative small towns, cheering on youth soccer teams in suburban8 parks, and filling hard, low-paid jobs in states of every ideological9 hue10.
Go back just a few years, and the idea that migrants might find safety by showing their strength would have sounded risible11.Nashvilleis a laid-back place: a tourist-friendly Democratic-voting dot in the middle of the conservative Bible Belt. Even so, its calm was tested when migrants began arriving in large numbers a generation ago, swelling13 a once-titchy foreign population centred on Kurdish refugees and Japanese car executives. City- and state-level politicians vied to restrict migrant access to public services. They tried to use everyone from police to schools to track unlawful residents, speeding their deportation. There were calls to “demagnetise”Tennesseeas a. In 2009 a referendum was held on makingNashville“English-only”, which would have barred the city from offering foreign-language information, services or even interpreters (it was voted down).
Activists14 remember a dark period. In 2008 the Tennessee Immigrant and Refugee Rights Coalition15 counted 65 anti-immigrant bills proposed in the state legislature. Migrants recall fear, too. Karla Ruiz, a Mexican caterer16, remembers driving her young (American-born) daughter in terror that even a burned-out brake light might trigger a police stop and immigration check leading to her deportation. Karl Dean, a Democrat12 who has beenNashville's mayor since 2007, admits to a period when Latinos “felt they couldn't engage with the police or city government”.
Yet that period from 2009-11 now looks like a high-water mark for nativism. Local firms campaigned hard againstNashville's English-only proposal: with a global brand,Nashvillecannot be “narrow” in its thinking, explains Ralph Schulz, president of the chamber17 of commerce. This year the Republican governor, Bill Haslam, has declined to join 17 other states in suing Mr Obama over his executive action. The governor is no liberal squish: he just has other priorities, starting with inward investment and upping the number of Tennesseans who go to college.
Change can even be detected in the state legislature, where Republicans hold crushing, three-to-one super-majorities in both houses. The flow of kick-'em-out bills slowed in 2012 and 2013. In 2014 a Republican state senator fromChattanooga, Todd Gardenhire, easily passed a law clarifying thatTennessee's public universities can admit American-born children of undocumented parents at the same discounted rate as other local residents. He could not pass a more ambitious bill, offering in-state tuition rates to kids who came illegally as children and who do well at school, but Mr Gardenhire vows18 to try again. In the past five years some 18,000 Hispanic families have headed to his district, he reports, many after neighbouringAlabamaandGeorgiapassed “draconian” laws. Yes, they arrived illegally, but that is no reason to “punish kids”, argues the senator. “They are here, and they are trying to do their best.” To date, lots of his colleagues are “afraid” of challenges from the right in party primaries. But, hesays, th
ey know that educating youngsters makes “economic sense”.
Welcome to Nashville
City politicians, school officials and activists talk of a tipping point. With one-in-eightNashvilleresidents now foreign-born, and one-in-three local children living in a bilingual or non-English household, the city cannot simply wish newcomers away. Ms Ruiz reports that American friends may disapprove19 of Mr Obama's executive action, but they are happy for her that it will secure her legal papers. Mayor Dean goes further, drawing on the age-old traditions of American civic20 boosterism. Thanks to its ethnic21 diversity, “Nashvilleis a much more interesting city,” he says, with a “buzz” and an “energy” that bodes22 well for the future. In a highly mobile country, if people pickNashville, that is “the highest compliment they can pay,” he adds.
That is a very American statement. It puts timid, grudging23 politicians in other rich countries to shame. Mr Obama has taken a gamble that the nationwide spread of migrants helps the cause of immigration reform more than it harms it.Tennessee's example suggests he might be right.
1 deportation | |
n.驱逐,放逐 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 spats | |
n.口角( spat的名词复数 );小争吵;鞋罩;鞋套v.spit的过去式和过去分词( spat的第三人称单数 );口角;小争吵;鞋罩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 query | |
n.疑问,问号,质问;vt.询问,表示怀疑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 scraps | |
油渣 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 caveat | |
n.警告; 防止误解的说明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 enraged | |
使暴怒( enrage的过去式和过去分词 ); 歜; 激愤 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 wagering | |
v.在(某物)上赌钱,打赌( wager的现在分词 );保证,担保 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 suburban | |
adj.城郊的,在郊区的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 ideological | |
a.意识形态的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 hue | |
n.色度;色调;样子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 risible | |
adj.能笑的;可笑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 democrat | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士;民主党党员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 swelling | |
n.肿胀 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 activists | |
n.(政治活动的)积极分子,活动家( activist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 coalition | |
n.结合体,同盟,结合,联合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 caterer | |
n. 备办食物者,备办宴席者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 chamber | |
n.房间,寝室;会议厅;议院;会所 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 vows | |
誓言( vow的名词复数 ); 郑重宣布,许愿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 disapprove | |
v.不赞成,不同意,不批准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 civic | |
adj.城市的,都市的,市民的,公民的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 ethnic | |
adj.人种的,种族的,异教徒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 bodes | |
v.预示,预告,预言( bode的第三人称单数 );等待,停留( bide的过去分词 );居住;(过去式用bided)等待 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 grudging | |
adj.勉强的,吝啬的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|