-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
The attack on Charlie Hebdo
Terror in Paris
Islamists are assailing1 freedom of speech; but vilifying2 all Islam is the wrong way to counter bloody3 medievalism
THE latest issue of Charlie Hebdo, a satirical French magazine, spotlights4 Michel Houellebecq, author of a new novel that imagines the Islamisation of France and then the European Union. Critics had denounced Mr Houellebecq's book, which depicts5 a near future in which Islamists win France's presidency6 and compromise its freedoms, as Islamophobic scaremongering. Then, on the day of its publication, masked gunmen attacked Charlie Hebdo's offices in Paris. They yelled “Allahu Akbar” as they murdered 12 people and wounded others, in France's worst terrorist attack for half a century. The gunmen fled; police have named two brothers as suspects. As anti-immigrant sentiment—especially the anti-Muslim kind—seeps across Europe, from street protests in Dresden to English ballot7 boxes, the atrocity8 in Paris seemed ghoulishly to realise the continent's darkest nightmare; almost, in fact, to caricature it.
For all the grim, incessant9 warnings of terrorist threats, naturally the first reaction to this massacre10, in France and elsewhere, was outrage11. Yet the murders also demand a fuller response. The magazine was targeted because it cherished and promoted its right to offend: specifically to offend Muslims. That motive12 invokes13 two big themes. One is free speech, and whether it should have limits, self-imposed or otherwise. The answer to that is an emphatic14 no. The second is Muslim Europe—and whether episodes such as this are part of a civilisational struggle between Western democracies and extreme Islam, on a battlefield stretching continuously from Peshawar to Raqqa to the centre of Paris. Again, the answer is no.
Cartoons versus15 Kalashnikovs
Charlie Hebdo has been hit before. In 2006 its decision to reprint inflammatory cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad, first published in Denmark, was described by Jacques Chirac, then France's president, as a “manifest provocation”. In 2011 the magazine's offices were firebombed after it published an issue purporting16 to be guest-edited by the Prophet. That did not deter17 it: despite pleas from some French politicians, it insisted on its right to free speech. This week, when the gunmen came, they reportedly called for the offending cartoonists by name.
The magazine had the right to publish everything it did, and French law is right to allow it to. There can be no “but” in that sentence. Even when a picture or opinion is imprudent or tasteless, unless it directly incites18 violence it should not be banned. Charlie Hebdo lampoons19 all religions, not just Islam—but it would have the right to single out that faith if it wanted to, just as Islamists in Europe are entitled to denounce Western decadence20 if they so choose. In any case, there is a world of difference, and several centuries of liberal political thought, between giving and taking offence and killing21 people over it. Nothing can be done with a pencil or a keyboard that warrants a reprisal22 with a Kalashnikov.
This attack was more insidious23 than a random24 fusillade on a street or train. Part of the aim, probably, was to cow the Western media in their treatment of Islam. It must not. If the proper first response to the slaughter25 was outrage, after considering the argument that Charlie Hebdo made about free speech, the second response should be outrage, too.
Many observers will connect this fresh footage of gun-wielding men not to cartoons but to another kind of image: chaos26 in northern Nigeria, the snuff videos of Islamic State (IS) and Taliban-inflicted carnage in Afghanistan and Pakistan. All can seem part of a long, ongoing27 conflict between the values of the Enlightenment and obscurantist barbarism. For those who see things that way, the only solution is to fight back, by cracking down at home and engaging the enemy abroad.
Criminals, not clashing civilisations
They have a point: there may well be a connection between Paris and foreign jihad. Part of it is ideological28: in their minds, at least, terrorists in the West are often waging a worldwide battle for their faith, powered by ideas they pick up on the internet. There is a practical link, too. Some of those involved in recent European plots—and one of the suspects in the Charlie Hebdo attack—have been radicalised and trained in the Middle East, Afghanistan and Pakistan. Nearby and accessible, Syria is the main destination. This reflux is a worry for security services in France (home of the European Union's largest Muslim population) and across the continent, precisely29 because, newly expert and inflamed30, the returnees can perpetrate commando-style attacks like that on Charlie Hebdo. Involving small numbers of assailants and “soft” targets, these are much harder to detect and prevent than elaborate plans to blow up airliners31.
But preventing them is not impossible—indeed European security services frequently do. Slow though some were to spot the danger, the French and other governments have introduced measures to stop their citizens travelling abroad to fight, and to intercept32 them if they come back. Still, more pressure could be applied33 to Turkey, notionally an ally, to help stop the flow into Syria. “Deradicalisation” programmes for returnees, which might turn some of them into reverse missionaries34 for the awful truth about IS, are still in their infancy35.
For all that, thinking of Islamist terrorism as a single, coherent adversary36 is misleading and dangerous. The various groups have different backgrounds and goals, just as Muslim diasporas in the West originate in different countries and cultures. Many French Muslims, for example, have roots in north Africa; some are angered by the ban on wearing burqas in public places. Neither factor applies in, say, Britain. Thinking of Muslims overall as a homogenous37 group is still more foolhardy—however much some of the West's demagogues encourage voters to. Most are not extremists; fewer still support violence, as mainstream38 French imams swiftly pointed39 out.
The terrorists themselves, of course, are often keen to prove that the West does indeed anathematise all Muslims. To see such killers40 as representatives of a religion, and to reduce a complex picture to their preferred caricature, would be to reward their crimes—just as circumscribing41 the principle of free speech would be to bow to their medieval fantasies.
1 assailing | |
v.攻击( assail的现在分词 );困扰;质问;毅然应对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 vilifying | |
v.中伤,诽谤( vilify的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 bloody | |
adj.非常的的;流血的;残忍的;adv.很;vt.血染 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 spotlights | |
n.聚光灯(的光)( spotlight的名词复数 );公众注意的中心v.聚光照明( spotlight的第三人称单数 );使公众注意,使突出醒目 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 depicts | |
描绘,描画( depict的第三人称单数 ); 描述 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 presidency | |
n.总统(校长,总经理)的职位(任期) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 ballot | |
n.(不记名)投票,投票总数,投票权;vi.投票 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 atrocity | |
n.残暴,暴行 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 incessant | |
adj.不停的,连续的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 massacre | |
n.残杀,大屠杀;v.残杀,集体屠杀 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 outrage | |
n.暴行,侮辱,愤怒;vt.凌辱,激怒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 motive | |
n.动机,目的;adv.发动的,运动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 invokes | |
v.援引( invoke的第三人称单数 );行使(权利等);祈求救助;恳求 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 emphatic | |
adj.强调的,着重的;无可置疑的,明显的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 versus | |
prep.以…为对手,对;与…相比之下 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 purporting | |
v.声称是…,(装得)像是…的样子( purport的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 deter | |
vt.阻止,使不敢,吓住 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 incites | |
刺激,激励,煽动( incite的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 lampoons | |
n.讽刺文章或言辞( lampoon的名词复数 )v.冷嘲热讽,奚落( lampoon的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 decadence | |
n.衰落,颓废 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 killing | |
n.巨额利润;突然赚大钱,发大财 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 reprisal | |
n.报复,报仇,报复性劫掠 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 insidious | |
adj.阴险的,隐匿的,暗中为害的,(疾病)不知不觉之间加剧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 random | |
adj.随机的;任意的;n.偶然的(或随便的)行动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 slaughter | |
n.屠杀,屠宰;vt.屠杀,宰杀 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 chaos | |
n.混乱,无秩序 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 ongoing | |
adj.进行中的,前进的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 ideological | |
a.意识形态的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 precisely | |
adv.恰好,正好,精确地,细致地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 inflamed | |
adj.发炎的,红肿的v.(使)变红,发怒,过热( inflame的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 airliners | |
n.客机,班机( airliner的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 intercept | |
vt.拦截,截住,截击 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 applied | |
adj.应用的;v.应用,适用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 missionaries | |
n.传教士( missionary的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 infancy | |
n.婴儿期;幼年期;初期 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 adversary | |
adj.敌手,对手 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 homogenous | |
adj.同类的,同质的,纯系的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 mainstream | |
n.(思想或行为的)主流;adj.主流的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 pointed | |
adj.尖的,直截了当的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 killers | |
凶手( killer的名词复数 ); 消灭…者; 致命物; 极难的事 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 circumscribing | |
v.在…周围划线( circumscribe的现在分词 );划定…范围;限制;限定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|