-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
The United States, Japan and trade
Don't treat trade as a weapon
An Asian-Pacific trade deal looks within reach, but politicians should stop seeing it as a way to contain China
GOOD news out of Washington is rare. Last week congressional leaders agreed on a bipartisan bill which, if passed, would for the first time in years give the president “fast-track” authority when negotiating trade deals.
The bill would be a boost for the prospects1 of a huge trade deal, the Trans-Pacific Partnership2 (TPP), binding3 America with 11 economies (including Japan but not China) around the Pacific rim4.
Now, as if on cue, come welcome signals about the TPP itself.
As Japan's prime minister, Shinzo Abe, prepared to head to Washington for a much-anticipated trip including an invitation to address a joint5 session of Congress (see article),
he claimed that America and Japan were close to agreement over their bilateral6 terms—on which the whole TPP deal hinges.
Yet there are two big caveats7. First, fast track, formally known as Trade Promotion8 Authority, may still fall foul9 of Congress.
Second, Japan may not make any serious cuts to tariffs10 that protect its farmers.
Those outcomes are more likely because the Obama administration and the Japanese government have made a similar mistake:
both have been too quick to cast the TPP as a weapon in the containment11 of China.
Flanked by Japan and America, the TPP would link countries which make up 40% of global GDP.
It could boost world output by $220 billion a year by 2025.
It is supposed to reform difficult areas such as intellectual property, state-owned firms and environmental and labour standards.
It would join economies—from Vietnam to Australia—that lie at different ends of the spectrum12 of development.
But the TPP will not happen without fast track, which forces Congress into a yes/no vote on any pending13 trade deal and so avoids the risk that it will be amended14 into oblivion.
And the passage of fast track faces a lot of scepticism from Democrats15 (see article).
Some are implacably opposed. Others want America to have a bigger arsenal16 with which to fight against unfair traders.
Driven by a conviction that China artificially holds its currency down and destroys American jobs, Charles Schumer,
a powerful senator from New York, is determined17 that fast track should include a provision that would make sure a trade deal included sanctions on currency manipulation.
Attaching a currency-manipulation clause to trade deals is a poor idea, both because the practice is hard to define and because the addition of such clauses makes reaching an agreement less likely.
But since the Obama administration has pitched TPP as a counterbalance to an assertive18 China, Mr Schumer's demands are harder to ignore.
Give trade a chance、
The same mistaken logic19 looks set to cause problems in Japan.
Mr Abe committed his country to joining the TPP on strategic grounds—as a counterweight to China—rather than because he is a born admirer of free trade.
When he entered negotiations20, some of his backers thought that, by playing the China card, Japan would be spared from making real concessions21:
that America would care more about a pact22 that excluded China than about prising open Japan's most protected markets, particularly rice.
Even now, Japan seems to want to keep tariffs high. The best it may offer is to allow in a fixed23 quota24 of tariff-free rice from the TPP's other members, America included.
If the China-containment logic leads to a minimalist agreement, then the economic gains from TPP will be slim.
TPP's real value is to set high new standards for world trade, and that demands the boldest possible agreement.
And in the long run the world gains most if China joins. The rhetoric25 makes trade negotiations sound like a contest.
In fact, it is a battle where the more you give away the more you win.
1 prospects | |
n.希望,前途(恒为复数) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 partnership | |
n.合作关系,伙伴关系 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 binding | |
有约束力的,有效的,应遵守的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 rim | |
n.(圆物的)边,轮缘;边界 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 joint | |
adj.联合的,共同的;n.关节,接合处;v.连接,贴合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 bilateral | |
adj.双方的,两边的,两侧的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 caveats | |
警告 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 promotion | |
n.提升,晋级;促销,宣传 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 foul | |
adj.污秽的;邪恶的;v.弄脏;妨害;犯规;n.犯规 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 tariffs | |
关税制度; 关税( tariff的名词复数 ); 关税表; (旅馆或饭店等的)收费表; 量刑标准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 containment | |
n.阻止,遏制;容量 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 spectrum | |
n.谱,光谱,频谱;范围,幅度,系列 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 pending | |
prep.直到,等待…期间;adj.待定的;迫近的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 Amended | |
adj. 修正的 动词amend的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 arsenal | |
n.兵工厂,军械库 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 determined | |
adj.坚定的;有决心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 assertive | |
adj.果断的,自信的,有冲劲的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 logic | |
n.逻辑(学);逻辑性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 negotiations | |
协商( negotiation的名词复数 ); 谈判; 完成(难事); 通过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 concessions | |
n.(尤指由政府或雇主给予的)特许权( concession的名词复数 );承认;减价;(在某地的)特许经营权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 pact | |
n.合同,条约,公约,协定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 fixed | |
adj.固定的,不变的,准备好的;(计算机)固定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 quota | |
n.(生产、进出口等的)配额,(移民的)限额 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 rhetoric | |
n.修辞学,浮夸之言语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|