-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Beautiful game, dirty business
Football is a great sport, but it could be so much better if it were run honestly
THE mesmerising wizardry of Lionel Messi and the muscular grace of Cristiano Ronaldo are joys to behold1.
But for deep-dyed internationalists like this newspaper, the game's true beauty lies in its long reach, from east to west and north to south.
Football, more than any other sport, has thrived on globalisation. Nearly half of humanity will watch at least part of the World Cup, which kicks off in Brazil on June 12th.
So it is sad that the tournament begins under a cloud as big as the Maracan? stadium.
Documents obtained by Britain's Sunday Times have allegedly revealed secret payments that helped Qatar win the hosting rights to the World Cup in 2022.
If that competition was fixed2, it has company. A report by FIFA, football's governing body,
is said to have found that several exhibition matches were rigged ahead of the World Cup in 2010. And as usual, no one has been punished.
This only prompts other questions. Why on earth did anyone think holding the World Cup in the middle of the Arabian summer was a good idea?
Why is football so far behind other sports like rugby, cricket and tennis in using technology to doublecheck refereeing3 decisions?
And why is the world's greatest game led by such a group of mediocrities, notably4 Sepp Blatter, FIFA's boss since 1998?
In any other organisation5, the endless financial scandals would have led to his ouster years ago.
But more than that, he seems hopelessly out of date; from sexist remarks about women to interrupting a minute's silence for Nelson Mandela after only 11 seconds,
the 78-year-old is the sort of dinosaur6 that left corporate7 boardrooms in the 1970s.
Nor is it exactly heartening that the attempts to stop Mr Blatter enjoying a fifth term are being led by Michel Platini,
Europe's leading soccercrat, who was once a wonderful midfielder but played a woeful role in supporting the Qatar bid.
Our cheating rotten scoundrels are better than yours
Many football fans are indifferent to all this. What matters to them is the beautiful game, not the tired old suits who run it.
And FIFA's moral turpitude8 is hardly unique. The International Olympic Committee, after all, faced a Qatar-like scandal over the awarding of the winter games in 2002
(though it has made a much bigger attempt to clean itself up). The boss of Formula One, Bernie Ecclestone, stands accused of bribery10 in Germany,
while American basketball has just had to sack an owner for racist11 remarks. Cricket, the second-most-global sport, has had its own match-fixing scandals.
American football could be overwhelmed by compensation claims for injuries.
But football fans are wrong to think there is no cost to all this. First, corruption12 and complacency at the top makes it harder to fight skulduggery on the pitch.
Ever larger amounts of money are now being bet on each game—it may be $1 billion a match at the World Cup.
Under external pressure to reform, FIFA has recently brought in some good people, including a respected ethics13 tsar, Mark Pieth.
But who will listen to lectures about reform from an outfit14 whose public face is Mr Blatter?
Second, big-time corruption isn't victimless; nor does it end when a host country is chosen.
For shady regimes—the type that bribe9 football officials—a major sporting event is also a chance to defraud15 state coffers, for example by awarding fat contracts to cronies.
Tournaments that ought to be national celebrations risk becoming festivals of graft16.
Finally, there is a great opportunity cost. Football is not as global as it might be (see article).
The game has failed to conquer the world's three biggest countries: China, India and America.
In the United States soccer, as they call it, is played but not watched. In China and India the opposite is true.
The latter two will not be playing in Brazil (indeed, they have played in the World Cup finals just once between them).
In FIFA's defence, the big three's reticence17 owes much to their respective histories and cultures and the strength of existing sports, notably cricket in India.
And football is slowly gaining ground: in the United States the first cohort of American parents to grow up with the game are now passing it on to their children.
But that only underlines the madness of FIFA giving the cup to Qatar, not America.
And the foul18 air from FIFA's headquarters in Switzerland will hardly reassure19 young fans in China who are heartily20 sick of the corruption and match-fixing in their domestic soccer leagues.
It would be good to get rid of Mr Blatter, but that would not solve FIFA's structural21 problem. Though legally incorporated as a Swiss non-profit organisation, FIFA has no master.
Those who might hold it to account, such as national or regional football organisations, depend on its cash.
High barriers to entry make it unlikely that a rival will emerge, so FIFA has a natural monopoly over international football.
An entity22 like this should be regulated, but FIFA answers to no government.
All the same, more could be done. The Swiss should demand a clean-up or withdraw FIFA's favourable23 tax status.
Sponsors should also weigh in on graft and on the need to push forward with new technology:
an immediate24 video review of every penalty and goal awarded would be a start.
The hardest bit of the puzzle is the host-selection process. One option would be to stick the World Cup in one country and leave it there;
but that nation's home team would have a big advantage, and tournaments benefit from moving between different time zones.
An economically rational option would be to give this year's winner, and each successive champion,
the option of either hosting the tournament in eight years' time or auctioning25 off that right to the highest bidder26. That would favour football's powerhouses.
But as most of them already have the stadiums, there would be less waste—and it would provide even more of an incentive27 to win.
Sadly, soccer fans are romantic nationalists, not logical economists—so our proposal stands less chance of winning than England does.
One small step towards sanity28 would be formally to rotate the tournament, so it went, say, from Europe to Africa to Asia to the Americas,
which would at least stop intercontinental corruption. But very little of this will happen without change at the top in Zurich.
1 behold | |
v.看,注视,看到 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 fixed | |
adj.固定的,不变的,准备好的;(计算机)固定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 refereeing | |
[计]仲裁,审稿工作,稿件评审 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 notably | |
adv.值得注意地,显著地,尤其地,特别地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 organisation | |
n.组织,安排,团体,有机休 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 dinosaur | |
n.恐龙 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 corporate | |
adj.共同的,全体的;公司的,企业的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 turpitude | |
n.可耻;邪恶 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 bribe | |
n.贿赂;v.向…行贿,买通 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 bribery | |
n.贿络行为,行贿,受贿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 racist | |
n.种族主义者,种族主义分子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 corruption | |
n.腐败,堕落,贪污 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 ethics | |
n.伦理学;伦理观,道德标准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 outfit | |
n.(为特殊用途的)全套装备,全套服装 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 defraud | |
vt.欺骗,欺诈 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 graft | |
n.移植,嫁接,艰苦工作,贪污;v.移植,嫁接 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 reticence | |
n.沉默,含蓄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 foul | |
adj.污秽的;邪恶的;v.弄脏;妨害;犯规;n.犯规 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 reassure | |
v.使放心,使消除疑虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 heartily | |
adv.衷心地,诚恳地,十分,很 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 structural | |
adj.构造的,组织的,建筑(用)的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 entity | |
n.实体,独立存在体,实际存在物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 favourable | |
adj.赞成的,称赞的,有利的,良好的,顺利的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 immediate | |
adj.立即的;直接的,最接近的;紧靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 auctioning | |
v.拍卖( auction的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 bidder | |
n.(拍卖时的)出价人,报价人,投标人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 incentive | |
n.刺激;动力;鼓励;诱因;动机 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 sanity | |
n.心智健全,神智正常,判断正确 | |
参考例句: |
|
|