-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
After the leak, the Supreme1 Court seethes2 with resentment3 and fear behind the scenes
At the Supreme Court, nothing is as usual this term after the leak of Justice Samuel Alito's draft opinion in the biggest abortion5 case in nearly a half-century.
Normally at this time of year, the justices would be exchanging hundreds of pages of draft opinions and working with each other to resolve differences and reach consensus6 in the most challenging cases of the term. Instead, the court is riven with distrust among the law clerks, staff and, most of all, the justices themselves.
The atmosphere behind the scenes is so ugly that, as one source put it, "the place sounds like it's imploding7." To cite just one public example, Justice Clarence Thomas in a speech a few weeks ago seemed to say he no longer trusts his colleagues.
"When you lose that trust, especially in the institution that I'm in, it changes the institution fundamentally," he told a conservative group. "You begin to look over your shoulder. It's like kind of an infidelity that you can explain it but you can't undo8 it."
Specifically, he implied that he doesn't trust Chief Justice John Roberts.
"The court that was together 11 year[s] was a fabulous9 court. It was one you look forward to being a part of," he said.
Those 11 years were when the chief justice was William Rehnquist, who died in 2005 and was succeeded by Roberts, who, ironically, had been one of Rehnquist's clerks many years earlier.
The root of the current antipathy10 is not definitely known. What is known is that Roberts infuriated some of conservatives on the court 10 years ago when he changed his mind and voted to uphold key provisions of the Affordable11 Care Act. These switches are rare, but they do happen; justices change their minds, and in good faith. But that switch so angered some of the court's conservatives that it leaked, obviously from someone connected to a conservative justice, who aimed to embarrass Roberts.
A much bigger leak — and problem
Now, there is a much bigger and, in fact, unprecedented12 leak to deal with — an actual draft opinion reversing a half-century of abortion precedents13. The chief justice called the leak "a betrayal" and ordered the Supreme Court marshal to conduct an internal investigation14. But the investigation may only be adding to problems at the court.
To begin with, the Supreme Court marshal overseeing the probe has no experience as an investigator15; nor do the Supreme Court police. Their job is to protect the justices. And people who do have experience as investigators16 say that leak inquiries17 are, in the words of several, "nightmares."
The Supreme Court overturned Roe18 v. Wade19. What's next? Your health questions answered
ROE V. WADE AND THE FUTURE OF REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS IN AMERICA
If Roe v. Wade is overturned, what happens next? Your questions answered
Glenn Fine, a former inspector20 general for the Justice Department and then the Defense21 Department in both Democratic and Republican administrations, conducted and supervised lots of these investigations22.
Typically, he wrote, in the beginning "we would be told that ... only a few people had access to the material that had been leaked. Only a few individuals were at the key meeting or worked on the document."
But, he said, "invariably when we probed the universe of people who had access," the number expanded "exponentially." Instead of a discrete23 few, the number included "additional co-workers, office staff, computer administrative24 staff, family and friends of those working on the matter, even people who passed through the office," and in the pandemic era, one might assume, the homes of the justices and others working from home. Fine said that even if there was some evidence of contact with a reporter, "we were usually unable to prove that the contact led to the leak." Therefore, most of the time, all the investigators ended up with were theories and speculation25.
The internal investigation
Now, turning to this leak, CNN has reported that the court "has taken steps to" ask the clerks to sign sworn affidavits26 and to essentially28 dump their cellphones.
"Taken steps to" doesn't mean that anything has actually happened. But if the clerks have been asked to sign an affidavit27, it is unknown what is in the affidavit or will be in the affidavit. And while the leak of a draft opinion is in fact a huge ethical29 breach30, the draft is not classified, so the leak is not a crime. That said, lying in a sworn affidavit is.
So, imagine you swear under oath that you didn't have anything to do with the leak, and it turns out that your former college classmate is a reporter, and you had dinner with him in April prior to the leak; you could be in a heap of trouble. So, indications are that some law clerks are lawyering up. And some justices may forbid cooperation with a probe they see as a witch hunt.
Not to mention that if the court can dump information from a clerk's cellphone without a warrant, that directly contradicts the Supreme Court's own ruling eight years ago when it said that police could not search a suspected gang member's phone without a warrant after he was pulled over in a traffic stop.
Roberts wrote the court's unanimous opinion, saying that modern cellphones are not just another technological31 convenience. They are a compendium32 of everything in a person's life — your political preferences, interests, hobbies, medical records, where you have been and with whom.
"Allowing a warrantless search of all this information is not just an incidental intrusion like a peek33 into a cigarette pack," he said in summarizing the opinion from the bench. "It is a significant invasion of privacy."
The Fourth Amendment34, he noted35, was the Founders36' response to the reviled37 "general warrants" of the colonial era, which allowed British officers "to rummage38 through homes in an unrestrained search for evidence of criminal activity."
A cellphone search, without a warrant, the court concluded, is no different.
Now, however, the court may be doing just that, and the terrified law clerks have been calling law firms, wondering whether they need legal representation. All of this presents its own ethical problems, since these law firms do have cases in front of the Supreme Court.
As for the court itself, it is not in a good place.
"I don't know how on earth the court is going to finish up its work this term," said a source close to the justices. The clerks, he explained, are sort of "the court's diplomatic corps40." Especially at this time of year, they talk to each other, with the approval of their bosses, to find out how far the envelope can be pushed in this case or that one — or conversely, how can we soften41 language to get five justices on board. But at the moment, he noted, the clerks are terrified that their whole professional lives could be blown up, so they aren't able to do that. In short, it's a very perilous42 time for the Supreme Court.
1 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 seethes | |
(液体)沸腾( seethe的第三人称单数 ); 激动,大怒; 强压怒火; 生闷气(~with sth|~ at sth) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 resentment | |
n.怨愤,忿恨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 abortion | |
n.流产,堕胎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 consensus | |
n.(意见等的)一致,一致同意,共识 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 imploding | |
v.(使)向心聚爆( implode的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 undo | |
vt.解开,松开;取消,撤销 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 fabulous | |
adj.极好的;极为巨大的;寓言中的,传说中的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 antipathy | |
n.憎恶;反感,引起反感的人或事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 affordable | |
adj.支付得起的,不太昂贵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 unprecedented | |
adj.无前例的,新奇的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 precedents | |
引用单元; 范例( precedent的名词复数 ); 先前出现的事例; 前例; 先例 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 investigation | |
n.调查,调查研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 investigator | |
n.研究者,调查者,审查者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 investigators | |
n.调查者,审查者( investigator的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 inquiries | |
n.调查( inquiry的名词复数 );疑问;探究;打听 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 roe | |
n.鱼卵;獐鹿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 wade | |
v.跋涉,涉水;n.跋涉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 inspector | |
n.检查员,监察员,视察员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 investigations | |
(正式的)调查( investigation的名词复数 ); 侦查; 科学研究; 学术研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 discrete | |
adj.个别的,分离的,不连续的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 administrative | |
adj.行政的,管理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 speculation | |
n.思索,沉思;猜测;投机 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 affidavits | |
n.宣誓书,(经陈述者宣誓在法律上可采作证据的)书面陈述( affidavit的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 affidavit | |
n.宣誓书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 essentially | |
adv.本质上,实质上,基本上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 ethical | |
adj.伦理的,道德的,合乎道德的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 breach | |
n.违反,不履行;破裂;vt.冲破,攻破 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 technological | |
adj.技术的;工艺的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 compendium | |
n.简要,概略 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 peek | |
vi.偷看,窥视;n.偷偷的一看,一瞥 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 amendment | |
n.改正,修正,改善,修正案 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 noted | |
adj.著名的,知名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 founders | |
n.创始人( founder的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 reviled | |
v.辱骂,痛斥( revile的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 rummage | |
v./n.翻寻,仔细检查 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 turmoil | |
n.骚乱,混乱,动乱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 corps | |
n.(通信等兵种的)部队;(同类作的)一组 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 soften | |
v.(使)变柔软;(使)变柔和 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 perilous | |
adj.危险的,冒险的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|