-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Some states are changing the laws that govern community libraries
When the Kentucky Legislature started mulling a bill that would tighten2 control over public libraries earlier this year, librarians across the state called their lawmakers pushing for its defeat.
In the past, legislators would at least have heard them out, says Jean Ruark, chair of the advocacy committee of the Kentucky Library Association. Not this time.
"It seemed as though our efforts fell on deaf ears. There was a big outcry about the passage of that and they did it anyway," Ruark says.
At a time when public school libraries have increasingly become targets in the culture wars, some red states are going further, proposing legislation aimed at libraries serving the community as a whole. A few of the bills would open librarians up to legal liability over decisions they make.
While some of these bills have quietly died in committee, others have been signed into law, and librarians worry that the increasingly partisan3 climate is making them vulnerable to political pressure.
"We're seeing more indirect efforts to control what's available to the community or to put in laws that would direct how the library staff collects books," says Deborah Caldwell Stone, director of the American Library Association's Office for Intellectual Freedom.
"A lot of this legislation is really concerning, largely because of the breadth and scope of it, but also because it removes local control from communities," says Patrick Sweeney, executive director at EveryLibrary, an advocacy group that tracks the legislation.
The bill passed in Kentucky allows local library boards to be appointed by county officials. Sponsors argued that the move makes libraries, which are funded by local property taxes, more accountable to taxpayers4.
But opponents say the legislation will undermine the independence of local librarians, which are supposed to serve the public as a whole.
"It's giving all of this power to partisan elected officials in counties, and if their constituents5 start telling them they want to ban books, this would allow them to do it. This is incredibly dangerous," says Kentucky state Rep. Patti Minter, a Democrat6 who opposed the bill.
The bill was first passed by the Republican-controlled legislature and vetoed by Gov. Andy Beshear, a Democrat. But Republicans were able to muster7 enough additional support to override8 the veto, and the bill takes effect at the start of 2023.
Other states have reached further. In Iowa, a bill was proposed allowing city councils to overturn librarians' decisions about what books to buy and where they're displayed.
In Oklahoma, a bill was signed into law requiring public libraries to install filters on digital databases to prevent children from seeing obscene material. Anyone who deliberately9 flouts10 the law would face legal liability.
Most libraries already have filters in place, and Oklahoma state Rep. Todd Russ, a Republican, says he expects the bill to rarely if ever result in legal action.
"We're trying to be good partners here, he says. "We're not trying to create all these class action lawsuits11. We want to work with them to help create good protection, common sense stuff."
But other states, including Iowa and Idaho, have proposed similar bills, stripping away the legal immunity12 that librarians have traditionally enjoyed for the decisions they make.
Moreover, legal actions against librarians are not unheard of.
Parents in one Wyoming county recently filed criminal complaints with the local sheriff arguing that library staff members were "pandering13 obscenity" to minors14 because they carried books on LGBTQ themes, says Caldwell-Stone. After an investigation15, the local prosecutor16 decided17 not to press charges.
LGBTQ books typically generate the most controversy18, especially in rural areas, says Caldwell-Stone. The mayor of Ridgeland, Mississippi, cut funding for the local libraries earlier this year after complaining about "sexual content" in some material featured by the library.
His decision made headlines, and money poured into the library through a crowdfunding campaign that more than made up for the money lost.
But libraries can't depend on such campaigns long-term, and librarians such as Ruark worry that in the current political climate, the pressure on them is only going to turn up.
"I think people are concerned about what it's going to do," she says, "but they also feel powerless to make it be any different."
1 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 tighten | |
v.(使)变紧;(使)绷紧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 partisan | |
adj.党派性的;游击队的;n.游击队员;党徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 taxpayers | |
纳税人,纳税的机构( taxpayer的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 constituents | |
n.选民( constituent的名词复数 );成分;构成部分;要素 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 democrat | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士;民主党党员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 muster | |
v.集合,收集,鼓起,激起;n.集合,检阅,集合人员,点名册 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 override | |
vt.不顾,不理睬,否决;压倒,优先于 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 deliberately | |
adv.审慎地;蓄意地;故意地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 flouts | |
v.藐视,轻视( flout的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 lawsuits | |
n.诉讼( lawsuit的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 immunity | |
n.优惠;免除;豁免,豁免权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 pandering | |
v.迎合(他人的低级趣味或淫欲)( pander的现在分词 );纵容某人;迁就某事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 minors | |
n.未成年人( minor的名词复数 );副修科目;小公司;[逻辑学]小前提v.[主美国英语]副修,选修,兼修( minor的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 investigation | |
n.调查,调查研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 prosecutor | |
n.起诉人;检察官,公诉人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 controversy | |
n.争论,辩论,争吵 | |
参考例句: |
|
|