-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Hey, I’m Anderson Cooper. Welcome to the podcast. Claims of American’s given the U.N. power to told you how to raise your kids, but where the evidence. Keep Them Honest. We begin tonight as we do every night Keeping Them Honest. Trying to look for facts, not supporting Democrats1 or Republicans. You can find that in other cable channels. Our goal is just reporting, finding out facts and the truth.
We did that exactly last week when reporting the story that we’re focusing on again tonight. Again, because the more we look into it, the more we find people in powerful and influential2 places saying thing that just don’t square with the facts. It’s about a U.N. treaty that failed to be ratified3 by the Senate. A treaty that was meant to encourage other countries to be more like the U.S. on the issue of equal rights for the disabled. Now if other countries adopted better treatment of their disabled citizens, the idea that disabled Americans who visited or lived in other countries would also benefit.
Hundred and twenty-five countries had ratified the treaty. It was signed by Republican President George Bush, supported by the current president, and has the backing of senators from both sides of the aisle4, including John McCain and past Republican leaders like Bob Dole5, himself a disabled World War II Veteran. He was wheeled on to the Senate floor, you him there for the vote to see he hoped the treaty ratified.
Well, instead after pressure from special interest groups, 38 Republicans, some of them vowed6 to support the treaty, voted no. One of the loudest critics of the legislation was the Home School Legal Defense7 Association, the HSLDA. It’s the powerful lobby group around the country whose leader you’re about to meet. Now they have some very strong things to say about the treaty, but the notion was basically this. If it were to pass, they said, the U.N. treaty would somehow let the U.N. mandate8 how parents of disabled kids in America cared for their children. Americans, among the center is echoing that center is Mike Lee of Utah. Keeping Them Honest though, when I asked him to specify9 how this U.N. influence might manifest itself, last week I asked him this, here‘s the answer he gave.
Can you name any other U.N. treaty that has forced changes in U.S. law?
I didn’t come prepared to cite Supreme10 Court precedent11 on this point but it’s a well known fact…
But what you’re saying is hypothetical. You’re saying, you’re using a bunch of hypothetical saying they’re going to, you know, this is going to force abortion12 rights for people, for disabled people overseas. This is, they’re going to, I mean, some groups are saying children with glasses are going to be taken from their parents. You’re using all these very scary hypothetical. You can’t even cite one case where a U.N. treaty has ever impacted U.S. law?
I’m not aware of one person who’s saying that children with glasses are going to be taken away from their parents. The Article 7 concern from the treaty relates to the fact that the best interest of the child standard would be injected into decisions regarding how best to educate and otherwise care for a disabled child. (Again) It’s worked in the United States.
You can’t name one U.N. treaty that has ever had an impact on U.S. law?
Well, I can’t name one U.S. treaty that has been the deciding factor in a decision. It may well happen. I didn’t come prepared to cite Supreme Court precedent.
Well, about that eye glass claim I mentioned, the head of the HSLDA made it. You’ll hear it for yourself in a moment. It also says the treaty would allow the United Nations to dictate13, say, the number of handicapped parking spaces in church parking lots in America and allow U.N. bureaucrats14 in Geneva to change American laws. The evidence they cite, though, doesn’t stand up to the scrutiny15, according to former Republicans Attorney General Richard Thornburgh, himself the father of a disabled son.
点击收听单词发音
1 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 influential | |
adj.有影响的,有权势的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 ratified | |
v.批准,签认(合约等)( ratify的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 aisle | |
n.(教堂、教室、戏院等里的)过道,通道 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 dole | |
n.救济,(失业)救济金;vt.(out)发放,发给 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 vowed | |
起誓,发誓(vow的过去式与过去分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 mandate | |
n.托管地;命令,指示 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 specify | |
vt.指定,详细说明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 precedent | |
n.先例,前例;惯例;adj.在前的,在先的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 abortion | |
n.流产,堕胎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 dictate | |
v.口授;(使)听写;指令,指示,命令 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 bureaucrats | |
n.官僚( bureaucrat的名词复数 );官僚主义;官僚主义者;官僚语言 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 scrutiny | |
n.详细检查,仔细观察 | |
参考例句: |
|
|