-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
by Michael W. Flynn
First, a disclaimer: Although I am an attorney, the legal information in this podcast is not intended to be a substitute for seeking personalized legal advice from an attorney licensed1 to practice in your jurisdiction2. Further, I do not intend to create an attorney-client relationship with any listener.
On June 7, 2007, Idaho Senator Larry Craig was arrested on suspicion of lewd3 conduct arising from an incident where Senator Craig allegedly attempted to engage in sexual activity with an undercover police officer in a Minneapolis airport bathroom. Senator Craig pleaded guilty to that offense4, but recently filed a motion to withdraw that plea. Today I will discuss the circumstances under which a criminal defendant5 may withdraw a plea.
First, it is necessary to understand what pleading in a criminal case is. The Constitution guarantees to criminal defendants6 the right to due process and a trial. The due process right generally requires the government to inform the accused of the charges against him, and then the defendant has the right to a trial at which the government bears the burden to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant committed the crime. However, a criminal defendant may waive7 his right to a jury trial, and simply plead guilty to the charge. When a defendant pleads guilty, he effectively accepts the truth of the charges by allowing the government to forego having to prove the charges.
But, a defendant may later withdraw his own plea. While there is no absolute right to withdraw a plea, courts will generally grant a motion to withdraw a plea where it would be manifestly unjust to allow the plea to stand. Various courts, both federal and state, have recognized circumstances that give rise to a manifest injustice8.
First, a court will grant a motion to withdraw a plea where the defendant did not voluntarily enter into the plea. For example, a court allowed a defendant to withdraw where the arresting officers had used mace9 on him while arresting him, and intimated that they would use the mace again if the defendant did not cooperate with them. Also, courts have allowed a withdrawal10 where the defendant was led to believe by police officers that pleading not guilty would result in a much harsher sentence, and that he would never be allowed to see his children again.
Second, a court will allow withdrawal where the defendant did not understand the charges against him. This often occurs where the defendant does not have an attorney present when he enters his guilty plea. Typically, a court will allow the withdrawal only where the police or the court did not explain the factual basis of the charges. But, courts will not generally allow withdrawal simply where the defendant does not understand the peripheral11 effects of a guilty plea. For example, courts have consistently denied withdrawal where a defendant argues that he did not understand that pleading guilty to a felony has immigration or occupational effects.
Third, courts have permitted withdrawal where the defendant was not informed of his constitutional rights such as the right to a jury trial or the right to counsel. If the criminal defendant is not informed that he can challenge the charges against him in open court, and with an attorney working on his behalf, then a court will usually withdraw his plea. Further, if the defendant was represented by counsel at his plea, but the attorney is later shown to have rendered incompetent12 service, then the defendant may ordinarily withdraw.
Last, a court will withdraw a plea where there does not exist any factual basis for the plea. For example, a defendant was charged with battery and theft of a car. But, the statement from the victim only indicated that the car was stolen, but not that the defendant had touched or harmed her while stealing the car. The defendant pleaded guilty to both stealing the car and battery. The court allowed the defendant to withdraw his guilty plea to the battery charge because there was no evidence that would provide the factual basis for that charge.
Senator Craig has challenged his plea on several grounds. He argues that his plea was not voluntary because he was under severe anxiety at the incident becoming public, and that he had a plane to catch. He argues that the officer promised him that the incident would remain private if he pleaded guilty, and so his guilty plea was made under the extreme stress of the situation. Craig also argues that there are insufficient13 facts to support the conviction. He argues that the officer’s version of the events in the bathroom stall cannot support a conviction under the Minnesota disorderly conduct statute14.
(To see the full text of Craig’s motion, please see:..............
Whether the judge will accept these arguments remains15 to be seen.
Thank you for listening to Legal Lad’s Quick and Dirty Tips for a More Lawful16 Life. Be sure to check out all the excellent Quick and Dirty Tips podcasts at QuickAndDirtyTips.com.
You can send questions and comments to.............or call them in to the voicemail line at 206-202-4LAW. Please note that doing so will not create an attorney-client relationship and will be used for the purposes of this podcast only.
Legal Lad's theme music is "No Good Layabout" by Kevin MacLeod.
1 licensed | |
adj.得到许可的v.许可,颁发执照(license的过去式和过去分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 jurisdiction | |
n.司法权,审判权,管辖权,控制权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 lewd | |
adj.淫荡的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 offense | |
n.犯规,违法行为;冒犯,得罪 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 defendant | |
n.被告;adj.处于被告地位的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 defendants | |
被告( defendant的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 waive | |
vt.放弃,不坚持(规定、要求、权力等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 injustice | |
n.非正义,不公正,不公平,侵犯(别人的)权利 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 mace | |
n.狼牙棒,豆蔻干皮 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 withdrawal | |
n.取回,提款;撤退,撤军;收回,撤销 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 peripheral | |
adj.周边的,外围的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 incompetent | |
adj.无能力的,不能胜任的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 insufficient | |
adj.(for,of)不足的,不够的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 statute | |
n.成文法,法令,法规;章程,规则,条例 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 lawful | |
adj.法律许可的,守法的,合法的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|