-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
by Michael W. Flynn
First, a disclaimer: Although I am an attorney, the legal information in this podcast is not intended to be a substitute for seeking personalized legal advice from an attorney licensed1 to practice in your jurisdiction2. Further, I do not intend to create an attorney-client relationship with any listener.
The Supreme3 Court concludes its term at the end of June, and each year, the court typically releases its most-awaited and sharply-divided opinions. Today I will discuss one of those opinions in which the court ruled that sentencing a person to death for raping4 a child is unconstitutional.
The Eighth Amendment5 provides:
Excessive bail6 shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted8.
This amendment is broadly interpreted to limit the punishment that the government can inflict7 on you. But, as with so many constitutional clauses, interpreting the precise meaning of a qualitative9 phrase is difficult, and the phrase “cruel and unusual” is no exception.
Justice Kennedy, writing for a five-justice majority, began the summary of the facts, writing, “Petitioner10's crime was one that cannot be recounted in these pages in a way sufficient to capture in full the hurt and horror inflicted on his victim or to convey the revulsion society, and the jury that represents it, sought to express by sentencing petitioner to death.”
And the facts of the case truly are heinous11. Patrick Kennedy (no relation) drugged and raped13 his eight-year-old stepdaughter before she went to school one morning. I will not recount the injuries that the girl sustained, but they were severe to say the least, and required emergency surgery.
Louisiana charged the defendant14 with aggravated15 rape12 of a child, which is a capital crime in that state. The jury unanimously convicted the defendant of the crime, and then unanimously sentenced him to death.
The Louisiana Supreme Court upheld the verdict, and held that the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition16 on cruel and unusual punishment did not bar sentencing a man to death who had committed a crime of such a heinous nature.
The United States Supreme Court reversed, holding that the Eighth Amendment bars Louisiana from imposing17 the death penalty for the rape of a child where the crime did not result, and was not intended to result, in the victim's death.
The Eighth Amendment was passed in the 18th Century, but the Supreme Court has ruled that, in order to determine whether a punishment goes too far, the Court must look to evolving standards. Recall that, when the Constitution and Bill of Rights took shape, punishments such as public beatings, and locking citizens in stocks in the public square were utilized18. The Supreme Court has recognized in several cases that the country’s original understanding of what is cruel and unusual cannot be the frozen standard against which modern punishments are viewed. Rather, the Court looks to several factors to conclude whether a sentence passes constitutional muster19 including 1) the proportionality of the punishment to the crime, and 2) the acceptance by today’s society as to the punishment.
On the first main factor, the Court determined20 that capital punishment is not proportional to the crime of child rape when the defendant did not intend to, nor did he cause, the victim to die. The Court recognized that child rape is brutal21 and despicable, but that the death penalty, the ultimate and irrevocable sanction against a person, should be reserved for defendants22 who kill. The Court based this decision in part on the notion that murder is the only crime that ends a person’s life. All other crimes, while harmful, still allow the person to continue living.
On the second factor, the acceptance by society, the Court reviewed the history of capital punishment for rape in America, and how state legislatures had dealt with the issue. In 1925, 18 states allowed for capital punishment for rape. The last time a person was executed for rape was 1964. In 1972, the Court struck down the death penalty as a punishment for raping an adult. After that ruling, only three states passed laws that purportedly23 allowed execution for rape of adults and children, and three other states passed laws that allowed for execution for raping a child. Further, the Court has recently struck down the death penalty for the mentally retarded24 and for juveniles25.
Looking at these trends, the Court concluded that society no longer tolerated execution of defendants for the crime of rape, and thus the punishment was cruel and unusual as measured by today’s standards.
In dissent26, Justice Alito argued that it is within each state’s right to determine that the death penalty is appropriate for a crime as heinous as child rape. He argued that the consensus27 the majority relied upon was not as reaching as described. States are moving in the direction of punishing child rape by death, and also that a child who is raped is permanently28 damaged, albeit29 alive. Justice Alito and three other justices would have upheld the sentence.
In the aftermath, some politicians and legal commentators30 have decried31 this decision as incorrect. While they might want it changed, there is little to do legislatively32 about it short of amending33 the constitution. Alternatively, the states might try to write statutes34 that comport35 with this decision, allowing for execution of a person who rapes36 with the intent to kill for example. We must wait and see.
Thank you for listening to Legal Lad’s Quick and Dirty Tips for a More Lawful37 Life. Be sure to take the short listener survey by clicking on the green 5 to the right of the transcript38.
You can send questions and comments to。。。。。。。or call them in to the voicemail line at 206-202-4LAW. Please note that doing so will not create an attorney-client relationship and will be used for the purposes of this podcast only.
1 licensed | |
adj.得到许可的v.许可,颁发执照(license的过去式和过去分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 jurisdiction | |
n.司法权,审判权,管辖权,控制权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 raping | |
v.以暴力夺取,强夺( rape的现在分词 );强奸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 amendment | |
n.改正,修正,改善,修正案 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 bail | |
v.舀(水),保释;n.保证金,保释,保释人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 inflict | |
vt.(on)把…强加给,使遭受,使承担 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 inflicted | |
把…强加给,使承受,遭受( inflict的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 qualitative | |
adj.性质上的,质的,定性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 petitioner | |
n.请愿人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 heinous | |
adj.可憎的,十恶不赦的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 rape | |
n.抢夺,掠夺,强奸;vt.掠夺,抢夺,强奸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 raped | |
v.以暴力夺取,强夺( rape的过去式和过去分词 );强奸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 defendant | |
n.被告;adj.处于被告地位的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 aggravated | |
使恶化( aggravate的过去式和过去分词 ); 使更严重; 激怒; 使恼火 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 prohibition | |
n.禁止;禁令,禁律 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 imposing | |
adj.使人难忘的,壮丽的,堂皇的,雄伟的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 utilized | |
v.利用,使用( utilize的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 muster | |
v.集合,收集,鼓起,激起;n.集合,检阅,集合人员,点名册 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 determined | |
adj.坚定的;有决心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 brutal | |
adj.残忍的,野蛮的,不讲理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 defendants | |
被告( defendant的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 purportedly | |
adv.据称 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 retarded | |
a.智力迟钝的,智力发育迟缓的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 juveniles | |
n.青少年( juvenile的名词复数 );扮演少年角色的演员;未成年人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 dissent | |
n./v.不同意,持异议 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 consensus | |
n.(意见等的)一致,一致同意,共识 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 permanently | |
adv.永恒地,永久地,固定不变地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 albeit | |
conj.即使;纵使;虽然 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 commentators | |
n.评论员( commentator的名词复数 );时事评论员;注释者;实况广播员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 decried | |
v.公开反对,谴责( decry的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 legislatively | |
adv.立法地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 amending | |
改良,修改,修订( amend的现在分词 ); 改良,修改,修订( amend的第三人称单数 )( amends的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 statutes | |
成文法( statute的名词复数 ); 法令; 法规; 章程 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 comport | |
vi.相称,适合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 rapes | |
n.芸苔( rape的名词复数 );强奸罪;强奸案;肆意损坏v.以暴力夺取,强夺( rape的第三人称单数 );强奸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 lawful | |
adj.法律许可的,守法的,合法的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|