-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Donald Trump1 is now the presumptive GOP presidential nominee2 so, what does that portend3 for Republicans further down the ballot4?
For Donald Trump to win the presidency5, he'll have to change the Electoral College map to win states Republicans don't usually win. And, based on Trump's apparent appeal to blue collar voters in old Rust6 Belt states, Michigan is high on that list.
Michigan Republican Congresswoman Candice Miller7 endorsed8 Trump last week.
"In this case, with Donald Trump, I think Michigan is very much in play. I think the entire electoral map is going to be changing as evidenced by the recent poll that showed that he was neck and neck in three critical states, uh, literally9, a dead-heat in Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania, and if that is happening in Pennsylvania, I believe it is going to be happening in Michigan, as well. And, certainly in Macomb County, home of the Reagan Democrats10," Miller said last week.
But, at the same time, Democrats are hoping a lightning rod candidate like Trump will hand them opportunities.
In Michigan, we're specifically talking about some congressional seats and control of the state House of Representatives.
That's a big deal when you consider it's been six years since Democrats controlled the state House. Control would put Dems at the table for the final two years of Governor Rick Snyder's administration and it would break the complete GOP hegemony in Lansing.
So, the question is: what is the net effect of Donald Trump at the top of the ballot? The definitive11 answer is: we don't know.
This election year has been a wild, unpredictable ride and there's no reason to believe that's going to change. But, that won't keep us from sorting through the possibilities.
First off, Bernie Sanders won the Michigan Democratic primary, at least partially12, because of opposition13 to free trade deals that he says have outsourced U.S. jobs overseas. Well, Donald Trump won Michigan's Republican primary also slamming trade deals. Might there be some crossover appeal?
Meantime, this election, of course, won't be decided14 just by who turns out, but by who doesn't. And that means something in 2016 when both top candidates—Trump and Clinton—have high negative ratings in most polls.
Trump's got the bigger problem in the aggregate15, but Republicans say in most of the state House and congressional districts they're competing in, Clinton's got the higher negatives. Democrats say they expect the Trump effect will mostly turn in their favor.
So will voter distrust of either or both candidates suppress turnout? And, if so, which side loses more?
1 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 nominee | |
n.被提名者;被任命者;被推荐者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 portend | |
v.预兆,预示;给…以警告 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 ballot | |
n.(不记名)投票,投票总数,投票权;vi.投票 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 presidency | |
n.总统(校长,总经理)的职位(任期) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 rust | |
n.锈;v.生锈;(脑子)衰退 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 miller | |
n.磨坊主 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 endorsed | |
vt.& vi.endorse的过去式或过去分词形式v.赞同( endorse的过去式和过去分词 );在(尤指支票的)背面签字;在(文件的)背面写评论;在广告上说本人使用并赞同某产品 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 literally | |
adv.照字面意义,逐字地;确实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 definitive | |
adj.确切的,权威性的;最后的,决定性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 partially | |
adv.部分地,从某些方面讲 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 opposition | |
n.反对,敌对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 aggregate | |
adj.总计的,集合的;n.总数;v.合计;集合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|