-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Over the weekend, U.S. foreign policy scrambled1 to recover from the fatal attack on Iran's General Qassem Soleimani, the head of an elite2 military wing active in Iraq, Syria, and other hot spots. The U.S. has interests in all those places.
The Trump3 administration said it was acting4 to save American lives.
Senator Gary Peters is the ranking Democrat5 on the Senate Homeland Security Committee, and also serves on the Armed Services Committee. He's also a veteran of the U.S. Naval6 Reserve.
He spoke7 to Stateside Monday about President Trump’s decision to attack Soleimani.
Surely Soleimani was a bad actor. I don’t think there’s any disagreement with that fact,” Peters said. “He has blood on his hands and is responsible for the killing8 of many American men and women, service members, but certainly this represents an escalation9 in what we have seen happen in the Middle East.”
Peters said the outstanding question right now is, was the president acting on an imminent10 threat as he’s claimed?
I don’t have information related to that, we have not been briefed according to that, however, a briefing will be given to members of the Armed Services Committee and other senators later this week in a classified setting and I think we all come with some questions as to why this happened and, more importantly, what is the long-term strategic consequences of this, how was that thought out, and what sort of long-term strategy do we have in dealing11 with Iraq?” he said.
Senator Tim Kaine (D-Virginia) has introduced a War Powers Resolution that would stop any further action until Congress gets on board – U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says the House will vote on a similar resolution soon. Peters said if the Senate voted today, it would be difficult to pass the resolution, given the fact that Republican senators are in the majority. He also says Congress needs to reassert itself as the branch of government that has the power to declare war.
Peters said that de-escalation is an important next step, and that discussions need to take place.
There are no diplomatic channels that seem to be open. That should be happening even if you have to go through a third party. You have to have folks talking to each other. What we’re seeing instead is escalation of the rhetoric12 from both sides, both from President Trump, as well as the Iranian leaders. And the rhetoric could be potentially very dangerous and I’m very concerned about that.
1 scrambled | |
v.快速爬行( scramble的过去式和过去分词 );攀登;争夺;(军事飞机)紧急起飞 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 elite | |
n.精英阶层;实力集团;adj.杰出的,卓越的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 acting | |
n.演戏,行为,假装;adj.代理的,临时的,演出用的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 democrat | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士;民主党党员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 naval | |
adj.海军的,军舰的,船的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 killing | |
n.巨额利润;突然赚大钱,发大财 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 escalation | |
n.扩大,增加 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 imminent | |
adj.即将发生的,临近的,逼近的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 dealing | |
n.经商方法,待人态度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 rhetoric | |
n.修辞学,浮夸之言语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|