-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
STEVE INSKEEP, BYLINE1: House Speaker Paul Ryan stepped into a spare room at the Capitol yesterday.
PAUL RYAN: This was - yeah, this is the Board of Education. It's where Rayburn did all that stuff.
INSKEEP: The Board of Education - a name applied2 by past speakers of the House. You know, other lawmakers would be told, come have a drink. Get educated on how things work. Beneath the chandelier, Speaker Ryan settled into a chair with water to talk over issues from tax reform to President Trump3.
It's a video interview we're releasing at npr.org, and it came at a fraught4 moment. A national uprising over sexual harassment5 has reached Congress. The Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi had just called for Congressman6 John Conyers to resign. He's the lawmaker revealed to have made a secret settlement of a claim, apparently7 one of many, paid by the House.
RYAN: I think we're having a watershed8 moment in this country. I think this is a defining moment in this country, and I think it needs to be a defining moment in this country. I think we're all horrified9 at the stories we've been seeing unfold in the last few weeks. I think we're all realizing that sexual harassment in America is absolutely pervasive10, and it's got to go, and we need to end it. And nowhere more is this important to set a standard and example than elected officials. We should be held to a high standard.
So to that end, we've been holding hearings on this particular issue for how Congress governs itself. We've got another hearing next week. We're reviewing all of the systems - the procedures and the sense of accountability - so that we can review the entire soup to nuts system we have in place and where upgrades and improvements can be had. We have more steps to go.
INSKEEP: Do you believe that when Congress - when taxpayers11 pay a settlement for a member of Congress that the public should know...
RYAN: I do. I think - we're also trying to get data on the settlements. We're trying to figure out what claims are paid to whom. And what was the nature of these claims? The point is that some of the victims want that. So you have to remember, there are...
INSKEEP: OK.
RYAN: ...Victim rights issues here as well. So this is not as simple as it seems because of victims' rights.
INSKEEP: You said that public officials should be held to a very high standard. Can you define that for me a little bit?
RYAN: Well, that's a good question. I think the standard you want is - I want my daughter to grow up in a country - she's 15 years old - where she is empowered and respected wherever she goes and wherever she works and whatever she does. And I think nowhere should that be more obvious and apparent than working here in Capitol Hill. So I think here in Congress, we should set ourselves to standards that we expect of other people, and we should set high standards for ourselves so that we can be role models and set examples. And, clearly, people have been falling short of that.
INSKEEP: How bad is it?
RYAN: I don't know the answer to that yet.
INSKEEP: How are you going to find out?
RYAN: I think we're finding out just like the rest of Americans. We just found out about John Conyers about a week ago. So I think we're just finding out about some of these things, which are, quite frankly12, very disturbing.
INSKEEP: You quite early called for Roy Moore, the Alabama Senate candidate, to withdraw from the race after a number of accusations13 were made against him.
RYAN: It's because I believe those allegations are credible14.
INSKEEP: What is the difference between his case and the case of President Trump, who was also accused by a number of women and also denied it?
RYAN: I think that Roy Moore - I don't know if - I'm focused on Congress. Roy Moore is trying to come to Congress. My job here as Speaker of the House is to help make sure that Congress is an institution that we're proud of. And that's what I'm focused on. He's running for Congress, and I think the allegations against him were very, very credible.
INSKEEP: Is there a difference between those two cases?
RYAN: I don't know the answer to that. I haven't spent my time reviewing the difference in these two cases.
INSKEEP: Let me ask another question about the president, if I might, Mr. Speaker, because you talked about holding people to a high standard. In 2012, you gave a convention speech for Mitt15 Romney in which you talked about his high character as being above reproach. Is the president meeting that high standard?
RYAN: Look. It's no secret that he and I have had our difference of opinions. It's no secret that I've shared my opinions about his tweets and the rest. But what I see is a president who is fighting for the things that I'm fighting for. I see a president who's fighting for an agenda that will make a positive difference in people's lives. Is this president unconventional? No two ways about it. He's very unconventional. But if we make good by the American people by actually improving their lives and fixing problems, that's a good thing.
INSKEEP: How well do you think Congress is doing at keeping the president in check?
RYAN: Well, I think it's really important that we respect the balance of power between the two branches. I think on this front, the president's been actually very helpful on this. For instance, the executive orders that he's put in place since taking office rolled back a lot of the executive orders from the last administration that we believe did violence to the separation of powers.
INSKEEP: Let's talk about a couple of issues where it can be said the president is not following the intent of Congress. Congress passed sanctions on Russia for interfering16 in the election in 2016. It appears the administration has moved, but they're moving behind schedule, behind the legal timeline. Do you believe that's going to happen?
RYAN: I do, and I don't - I can't speak to the specifics of the timeline. I haven't been briefed on that.
INSKEEP: Are you confident that this president will be vigilant17 about Russian interference in the next U.S. election?
RYAN: Yeah, because we're going to make sure that that happens. I think it's really - this is why we have investigations18 here, among other reasons - is to get to the bottom of not just, what did Russia do? - but how did they do it, and how do we prevent it from happening again? And then how do we share it with our allies?
INSKEEP: Although the chief executive has referred to everything you just described as a hoax19.
RYAN: Well, I can't speak to that, only to speak that I believe our intelligence - I think he's also said he believes his intelligence community, so I'm not going to go for the tit for tat based on...
INSKEEP: But it gets...
RYAN: ...This.
INSKEEP: It gets to the question of whether you have confidence and why you would have confidence...
RYAN: I'll tell you what I believe.
INSKEEP: ...That people do what's necessary.
RYAN: I believe Russia did meddle20 with our elections. I believe we need to do more to make sure that they don't do it again. I believe consequences need to occur for that. Otherwise, they're going to keep doing this. And we have been passing these bills into law, and he's signed these bills into law. So I feel confident that we're going to make a positive difference in this area.
INSKEEP: Are you going to have a government shutdown on December 8?
RYAN: I don't think so. We'll see what the Senate Democrats21 do. I wish that our Democratic colleagues would choose to participate in the negotiations22 that we've been having. Now, we were negotiating. They chose to pull out of the negotiations at the beginning of this week.
INSKEEP: You're referring to a meeting with the president.
RYAN: That's right. So...
INSKEEP: They pulled out after the president said there's no point in meeting, essentially23.
RYAN: Ah.
INSKEEP: He said there was no room for a deal, I believe.
RYAN: I think that he was probably posturing24, and I think the Democrats chose to just not participate, and we haven't spoken to them since. And I think that that's walking away from the table. Look, I didn't agree with a lot of the stuff Barack Obama said, but whenever he asked me to come around to the White House to talk about a bill to negotiate something, I always went. So I think it's just - speaks to how our system works. Congress passes a law. The president signs a law. In order to get a law into law, you've got to negotiate with the president.
INSKEEP: Would you speak for a moment to people on the other side of the divide who look at Washington and see a president who, in their view, is out of control at best and a Congress that's not minding the store?
RYAN: You know, I would say, look at the House of Representatives. We passed more bills in the first 10 months of this administration than the first 10 months of Obama, Clinton and both Bushes. Unfortunately for us, over 300 of them are still piling up in the Senate because they have these filibusters25. But we've had the most productive House of Representatives in the modern era.
The other point you mention - people on the other side of the divide who didn't vote for Donald Trump, who have concerns about Donald Trump - this is the system we have. Government is working. Things are getting done. And we see ourselves here in Congress as sort of the ballast in the ship, making sure the ship of state floats in the right direction, goes in the right direction. And that is why we're focusing not on the controversy26 of the day but on the problems that people face each and every day. And that's why we're working on things like tax relief.
INSKEEP: Mr. Speaker, thanks very much.
RYAN: Great. Thank you, Steve.
INSKEEP: He talked to us yesterday at the Capitol. And elsewhere in today's program, we discuss the tax bill that passed the House and is now hanging by a thread in the Senate. We've been releasing video of that talk, as well.
1 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 applied | |
adj.应用的;v.应用,适用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 fraught | |
adj.充满…的,伴有(危险等)的;忧虑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 harassment | |
n.骚扰,扰乱,烦恼,烦乱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 Congressman | |
n.(美)国会议员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 apparently | |
adv.显然地;表面上,似乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 watershed | |
n.转折点,分水岭,分界线 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 horrified | |
a.(表现出)恐惧的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 pervasive | |
adj.普遍的;遍布的,(到处)弥漫的;渗透性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 taxpayers | |
纳税人,纳税的机构( taxpayer的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 frankly | |
adv.坦白地,直率地;坦率地说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 accusations | |
n.指责( accusation的名词复数 );指控;控告;(被告发、控告的)罪名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 credible | |
adj.可信任的,可靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 mitt | |
n.棒球手套,拳击手套,无指手套;vt.铐住,握手 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 interfering | |
adj. 妨碍的 动词interfere的现在分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 vigilant | |
adj.警觉的,警戒的,警惕的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 investigations | |
(正式的)调查( investigation的名词复数 ); 侦查; 科学研究; 学术研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 hoax | |
v.欺骗,哄骗,愚弄;n.愚弄人,恶作剧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 meddle | |
v.干预,干涉,插手 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 negotiations | |
协商( negotiation的名词复数 ); 谈判; 完成(难事); 通过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 essentially | |
adv.本质上,实质上,基本上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 posturing | |
做出某种姿势( posture的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 filibusters | |
n.掠夺兵( filibuster的名词复数 );暴兵;(用冗长的发言)阻挠议事的议员;会议妨碍行为v.阻碍或延宕国会或其他立法机构通过提案( filibuster的第三人称单数 );掠夺 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 controversy | |
n.争论,辩论,争吵 | |
参考例句: |
|
|