-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
LOURDES GARCIA-NAVARRO, HOST:
Republicans want to eliminate one of the nation's newest national monuments. President Obama created the 1.3 million-acre Bears Ears National Monument in Utah just days before he left office. The land which is near the Four Corners region in Utah is considered sacred to Native American tribes. But as NPR's Kirk Siegler reports, the effort to undo1 the monument is setting up a legal fight.
KIRK SIEGLER, BYLINE2: The main character in this story is a relatively3 obscure federal law called the Antiquities4 Act that dates back to President Teddy Roosevelt, who famously used it early and often. It was meant to protect ancient artifacts and ruins that at the time were being pilfered5 from western lands. It also allows for a president to protect these sites and the lands around them as national monuments without going through Congress.
ROBERT BISHOP6: Under the Antiquities Act, there is no ability of having any input7.
SIEGLER: One of its biggest critics is Utah Republican Representative Rob Bishop, who chairs the powerful House Natural Resources Committee.
BISHOP: No one ever gets to have a say. You don't work out things in advance. It has to be a gotcha moment where the president unveils something unilaterally.
SIEGLER: Bishop wants the Trump8 administration to also act by executive order and either shrink the Bears Ears Monument or nullify it altogether. Bears Ears connects a huge protected corridor that links several monuments that ultimately bring you to the Grand Canyon9.
BISHOP: It is the wrong size. It does not take into account the various uses that the land can do.
SIEGLER: And that's the big rub for Bishop. A national monument designation generally means new oil and gas drilling or, say, cattle grazing is off limits. Only the existing leases that are grandfathered in can be developed.
Now, what Bishop is talking about doing, overturning a national monument of this size, that's never been done before. And the law here is murky10, according to University of Colorado law professor Mark Squillace.
MARK SQUILLACE: And that's because the way that the Antiquities Act is structured, it essentially11 authorizes12 the president to proclaim but not to modify or revoke13 national monuments.
SIEGLER: Under the Act, only Congress can revoke a national monument outright14. But Squillace isn't sure the Utah congressional delegation15 has the votes.
SQUILLACE: It turns out that the designation of national monuments is very popular with the public.
SIEGLER: It's not yet clear what the new administration's move will be on Bears Ears, if there's one at all. During his Senate confirmation16 hearing, the president's nominee17 for Interior secretary, Ryan Zinke, had this to say about using the Antiquities Act in the reverse.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
RYAN ZINKE: Legally, it's untested. There is no statement that authorized18 rescinding19.
SIEGLER: Zinke did say the public has generally benefited from a lot of national monuments. Economic studies have shown rural towns around them often see increases in tourism and recreation business. Congressman20 Rob Bishop isn't buying it in Utah.
BISHOP: In the name of saying we're doing something for everyone, you actually hurt people, especially those - especially those who live in that particular area.
SIEGLER: San Juan County, home to Bears Ears, is the poorest county in the state. And Bishop wants more local control of federal public land. An analysis by the Center of Responsive Politics, however, found that he gets more campaign donations from outside his home state than any other lawmaker in the House, much of that coming from energy and agribusiness.
And one thing is clear - the fight over the future of the Bears Ears National Monument extends far beyond Utah.
UNIDENTIFIED PROTESTORS: (Chanting) Public lands in public hands.
SIEGLER: At the Utah state capitol recently, Cynthia Wilson of the Navajo Nation protested the state legislature's passage of a resolution condemning21 Bears Ears.
CYNTHIA WILSON: As indigenous22 people, this is nothing new to us. We have always been attacked on over our ancestral lands. And we're going to keep defending this monument. And we are resilient.
SIEGLER: Many tribes are pledging to mobilize from around the country to Utah to fight for the protection of Bears Ears if needed. Kirk Siegler, NPR News.
1 undo | |
vt.解开,松开;取消,撤销 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 relatively | |
adv.比较...地,相对地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 antiquities | |
n.古老( antiquity的名词复数 );古迹;古人们;古代的风俗习惯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 pilfered | |
v.偷窃(小东西),小偷( pilfer的过去式和过去分词 );偷窃(一般指小偷小摸) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 bishop | |
n.主教,(国际象棋)象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 input | |
n.输入(物);投入;vt.把(数据等)输入计算机 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 canyon | |
n.峡谷,溪谷 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 murky | |
adj.黑暗的,朦胧的;adv.阴暗地,混浊地;n.阴暗;昏暗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 essentially | |
adv.本质上,实质上,基本上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 authorizes | |
授权,批准,委托( authorize的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 revoke | |
v.废除,取消,撤回 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 outright | |
adv.坦率地;彻底地;立即;adj.无疑的;彻底的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 delegation | |
n.代表团;派遣 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 confirmation | |
n.证实,确认,批准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 nominee | |
n.被提名者;被任命者;被推荐者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 authorized | |
a.委任的,许可的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 rescinding | |
v.废除,取消( rescind的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 Congressman | |
n.(美)国会议员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 condemning | |
v.(通常因道义上的原因而)谴责( condemn的现在分词 );宣判;宣布…不能使用;迫使…陷于不幸的境地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 indigenous | |
adj.土产的,土生土长的,本地的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|