-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:
Senate Republican leaders have said that today would be the day they'd have their health care bill rewritten, but most senators have already left Washington for the July Fourth recess1. A tweet from President Trump2 this morning complicated their work. He said Republicans should immediately repeal3 the Affordable4 Care Act and replace it at a later date. The current bill gets rid of big parts of Obamacare, eliminates most of its taxes and shrinks Medicaid dramatically.
ROBERT SIEGEL, HOST:
We asked what was on your mind about the Senate proposal, and we heard from hundreds of you. NPR health policy correspondent Alison Kodjak is with us now to sort through a few more of those comments and questions. Good to see you again, Alison.
ALISON KODJAK, BYLINE5: You too. Thanks, Robert.
SIEGEL: And we're going to hear first from Jordan Myers. He's 29 years old. He's in Minneapolis. And when he was no longer eligible6 for insurance on his parents' plan, he bought insurance for himself on the exchange.
JORDAN MYERS: I purchased my insurance through the exchange for two and a half years. And what started to concern me was the increasing premiums7. I went from paying maybe $120 a month to paying somewhere in the neighborhood of $300 to $400. And I was seeing the doctor once a year for a checkup and other than that would not step inside of a doctor's office.
SIEGEL: Alison, Jordan describes his monthly cost for insurance tripling during that time. First of all, was that a typical experience for a young, healthy person buying health insurance through an exchange?
KODJAK: Well, it's not that unusual to have had your premiums go up that high, especially if you're young. Across the board on average, premiums top-line have doubled. But most people - Jordan's an exception here. Eight-five percent of people who buy insurance on the exchanges get subsidies8 to help offset9 those premiums.
SIEGEL: Let's say that Jordan has to go back to the exchange. In fact, he's gotten a job that actually has health insurance that goes along with it. Let's say he goes back. How would the Senate bill change things for him?
KODJAK: For someone like him, the Senate bill actually could be good news. The bill changes how insurance companies are allowed to charge for insurance. They're allowed to charge older people up to five times more than younger people instead of three times. So the hope is that for people like Jordan known as young invincibles, the kind of people who you really want to get into these exchanges - their costs will go down. More of them will buy insurance because they'll see value in it.
SIEGEL: It's his parents whose policy may go up, is what you're telling me.
KODJAK: (Laughter) Exactly.
SIEGEL: (Laughter) OK. Our next listener is anxious about the possible removal of protections for those with pre-existing conditions.
AMY MEYER: Hi. This is Amy Meyer. I'm from Corona10, Calif. I'm the mother of two teenage boys, ages 13 and 14. My children may have a disease called left hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. It's a disease that killed my maternal11 grandfather at the age of 52, killed my mother at the age of 52, and my brother had a heart transplant at the age of 51 and nine months. I've been asked by a cardiologist to have my children genetically12 tested to see if we could indicate the disease. But I'm refusing for the only reason that if they are positive for this disease, they will then have a pre-existing condition that may exclude them from health care later on.
SIEGEL: Just a terrible decision weighing on Amy Meyer, Alison. First, are her worries well-founded? Might a diagnosis13 of her sons be defined as a pre-existing condition?
KODJAK: Well, they definitely could. And that's a real concern. One of the big things the Affordable Care Act did was it ended the practice of insurance companies being able to refuse to cover people who had medical conditions. The Senate bill does keep the language that says insurance companies have to offer policies to people with pre-existing conditions like these boys could have.
SIEGEL: Right.
KODJAK: But they added a really big loophole. It allows states to opt14 out of this long series of consumer protections that are included in the ACA. And one is a list of benefits insurance companies have to offer. And they include hospitalization. They include prescription15 drug coverage16, mental health care or maternity17 care. And so if a state opts18 out, you could end up with a policy that technically19, like, covers your cancer treatment but doesn't pay for your cancer medication. And so that really can change the idea of being protected for your pre-existing conditions.
SIEGEL: A lot of people wrote to us asking about the taxes that were introduced by the Affordable Care Act, most of which the - if not all of which the Republicans say they'd like to undo20. How rich do you have to be to be one of those rich people who's being taxed by the Affordable Care Act?
KODJAK: You have to have a pretty good income - if you're an individual, $200,000 - a couple, $250,000. And then you get taxed on your income above that amount. And also there's a tax on investment income above $250,000. And those along with a lot of corporate21 taxes have helped to pay for the Medicaid expansion. They've helped to pay for those subsidies that help people buy insurance.
SIEGEL: You're already being taxed on that income at the marginal rate. How much more are you taxed under the Affordable Care Act, an extra percent? Or...
KODJAK: It's an extra percent for your income, an extra 3.9 for your investment income.
SIEGEL: Now, one listener wrote in and said that many people just aren't following what's happening in Congress because they're covered by their employers, and they think that they'll be unaffected. And listener David Hayes wants to know if that's true.
KODJAK: Well, not completely true. People who have employer health insurance should be paying attention. The Affordable Care Act requires employers of a certain size to offer coverage to their employees, and this bill takes away that mandate22. And in addition, some of the consumer protections that are in the Affordable Care Act that now actually apply to employers may not if states take those waivers because employers can choose which state to follow in terms of their requirements.
SIEGEL: So you might find yourself in a state where, say, your employer has been able to offer insurance that doesn't cover maternity care, doesn't cover obstetrics.
KODJAK: Exactly. Or you know, if there's one thing that we hear a lot about is this lifetime limits. People will have a limit on how much they can get in terms of medical benefits over their lifetime. Those are gone under the Affordable Care Act. They could potentially come back as well.
SIEGEL: That's NPR health policy correspondent Alison Kodjak. Thanks so much.
KODJAK: Thanks, Robert.
1 recess | |
n.短期休息,壁凹(墙上装架子,柜子等凹处) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 repeal | |
n.废止,撤消;v.废止,撤消 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 affordable | |
adj.支付得起的,不太昂贵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 eligible | |
adj.有条件被选中的;(尤指婚姻等)合适(意)的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 premiums | |
n.费用( premium的名词复数 );保险费;额外费用;(商品定价、贷款利息等以外的)加价 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 subsidies | |
n.补贴,津贴,补助金( subsidy的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 offset | |
n.分支,补偿;v.抵消,补偿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 corona | |
n.日冕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 maternal | |
adj.母亲的,母亲般的,母系的,母方的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 genetically | |
adv.遗传上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 diagnosis | |
n.诊断,诊断结果,调查分析,判断 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 opt | |
vi.选择,决定做某事 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 prescription | |
n.处方,开药;指示,规定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 coverage | |
n.报导,保险范围,保险额,范围,覆盖 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 maternity | |
n.母性,母道,妇产科病房;adj.孕妇的,母性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 opts | |
v.选择,挑选( opt的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 technically | |
adv.专门地,技术上地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 undo | |
vt.解开,松开;取消,撤销 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 corporate | |
adj.共同的,全体的;公司的,企业的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 mandate | |
n.托管地;命令,指示 | |
参考例句: |
|
|