-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:
Many teachers across the country are calling on their state pension funds to sell their stakes in gun manufacturers. The teachers say they don't want their retirement1 money invested in these companies. But many people, including those sympathetic to the cause, doubt that divestment will bring about the policy changes activists3 seek. NPR's Yuki Noguchi explains.
YUKI NOGUCHI, BYLINE4: Many state pension funds investing on behalf of public employees and teachers own shares in firearms makers5. They do so primarily because those stocks are included in index funds that pensions invest in.
California Treasurer6 John Chiang wants that to change. He sits on the boards of his state's two largest pension funds, CalPERS for public employees and CalSTRS for teachers. He's urging pensions across the country to sell off their investments in gunmakers and gun retailers7.
JOHN CHIANG: We could make a clear and powerful signal that the action by Congress is heartless. It's imponderable, and there are people who want to make sure that kids aren't losing their lives.
NOGUCHI: In 2015, following another school mass shooting, CalSTRS - California State Teachers' Retirement Fund (ph) - sold off its stake in publicly traded gun makers, including Sturm Ruger and American Outdoor Brands, formerly8 Smith and Wesson. Christopher Ailman is CalSTRS' chief investment officer.
CHRISTOPHER AILMAN: After the Sandy Hook disaster, our board took a look at particularly firearms and decided9 there were certain companies that made firearms that were already illegal in the state of California and felt that that regulation may expand and hurt those companies. And so we divested10 of them.
NOGUCHI: He says it was a financial decision, not a moral one. The fund surmised11 gun manufacturers were not going to do well in the future, so it sold its shares. Over the decades, CalSTRS has divested from other industries, including tobacco and coal. In each instance, Ailman says it did so because it anticipated stricter regulation, which would hurt those companies' sales. It might be surprising, but in each case, the fund's decision to sell had zero impact on the target company's products or strategy.
AILMAN: We had to write them a letter and tell them we no longer own their stock and wouldn't in the future. And I can tell you, they don't care.
NOGUCHI: He says it's important for the public to understand selling shares is not a proxy12 for policy change.
AILMAN: I care about many of these issues personally, very deeply and want to bring about social change, and I just am frustrated13 that activists are wasting their time focusing in on this as a mechanism14 when it's not effective.
NOGUCHI: Avery Gardiner, co-president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, argues boycotts16 are probably more effective at exerting economic pressure. She says the #BoycottNRA campaign is a start but thinks it should include a broad consumer boycott15 of retailers that have lax policies on gun sales.
AVERY GARDINER: If Big 5 or Camping World or DICK'S Sporting Goods won't adopt sensible practices related to selling guns, then people shouldn't buy their soccer cleats and footballs and other equipment at those stores either.
NOGUCHI: That would affect those companies' profitability, she says, whereas investors17 who sell off their shares simply lose their rights as shareholders19.
GARDINER: One of those rights is to get information about the company. Another is to attend an annual meeting and vote for the directors. Shareholders can introduce shareholder18 resolutions. They can inspect the books and records of companies. So those are rights that investors might forgo20 if they decided to divest2 out of gun companies.
NOGUCHI: And so far, few pensions are doing so, says Alex Brown, research manager for the National Association of State Retirement Administrators21.
ALEX BROWN: The markets today are global. And generally, for every seller, there's a willing buyer.
NOGUCHI: Yuki Noguchi, NPR News, Washington.
(SOUNDBITE OF SOUNUT'S "GRADUATION")
1 retirement | |
n.退休,退职 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 divest | |
v.脱去,剥除 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 activists | |
n.(政治活动的)积极分子,活动家( activist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 makers | |
n.制造者,制造商(maker的复数形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 treasurer | |
n.司库,财务主管 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 retailers | |
零售商,零售店( retailer的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 formerly | |
adv.从前,以前 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 divested | |
v.剥夺( divest的过去式和过去分词 );脱去(衣服);2。从…取去…;1。(给某人)脱衣服 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 surmised | |
v.臆测,推断( surmise的过去式和过去分词 );揣测;猜想 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 proxy | |
n.代理权,代表权;(对代理人的)委托书;代理人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 frustrated | |
adj.挫败的,失意的,泄气的v.使不成功( frustrate的过去式和过去分词 );挫败;使受挫折;令人沮丧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 mechanism | |
n.机械装置;机构,结构 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 boycott | |
n./v.(联合)抵制,拒绝参与 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 boycotts | |
(对某事物的)抵制( boycott的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 investors | |
n.投资者,出资者( investor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 shareholder | |
n.股东,股票持有人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 shareholders | |
n.股东( shareholder的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 forgo | |
v.放弃,抛弃 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 administrators | |
n.管理者( administrator的名词复数 );有管理(或行政)才能的人;(由遗嘱检验法庭指定的)遗产管理人;奉派暂管主教教区的牧师 | |
参考例句: |
|
|