-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
AILSA CHANG, HOST:
Starbucks' plan to close all of its U.S. stores for an afternoon to give their employees racial bias1 training has a lot of people asking, will this even work? We know little about what the training will include. Starbucks has said they'll be looking at implicit2 bias, among other things. For some thoughts about how all of this might go down, we called up Alexis McGill Johnson. She runs racial bias workshops for the Perception Institute. I began by asking her, what exactly is implicit bias?
ALEXIS MCGILL JOHNSON: Implicit bias is our brains' automatic processing of negative stereotypes3 that have become embedded4 in our brains over time about particular groups of people oftentimes without our conscious awareness5. They are essentially6 associations that we've come to link with particular groups' traits and characteristics that help us navigate7 and make quick decisions about who those people are.
CHANG: But my first question to that is, can you actually teach implicit bias out of somebody? Can you recircuit the brain?
JOHNSON: Yeah, can you actually retrain your brain to see people differently?
CHANG: Yeah.
JOHNSON: Absolutely. Can you do it in a short period of time - absolutely not. It's taken centuries for our brains to create these negative schemas about particular groups of people that have been marginalized in society. And so it will take a really concerted, intentional8 effort to develop the counter-stereotypes that are required to move them out of our brains and replace them with others.
CHANG: So give us some concrete examples of how you would try to cultivate awareness of biases9 in ourselves. How do you teach this?
JOHNSON: Well, actually, I kind of think our workshops are quite fun and quite disarming10. We use the science of how our brains work. We start with an idea of a fairness paradox11, this idea that most of us believe ourselves to be fundamentally fair. We believe in the egalitarian of all races and genders12. And yet these behaviors arise, and then we cannot explain - we can't account for the disparity in outcomes.
And so the question we've raised at Perception is perhaps the way we've been practicing fairness is flawed. We've been taught to be colorblind. We've been taught that we can be objective when it comes to evaluating people, and the science suggests that sometimes our values aren't sufficient for us to actually practice those pieces because our brains see race very quickly.
CHANG: Yeah.
JOHNSON: They see gender13 very quickly and end up overriding14 that.
CHANG: But what would you - like, give me an exercise you would do at one of these workshops to sort of illustrate15 that tension.
JOHNSON: Sure. Why don't we do this. So the radius16 of a wheel is called a...
JOHNSON: I tell you something funny. It's a...
CHANG: Joke.
JOHNSON: I don't drink Pepsi. I like...
CHANG: Coke.
JOHNSON: The white part of an egg is called a...
JOHNSON: No.
CHANG: Oh.
JOHNSON: The white part of an egg is called an egg white (laughter).
CHANG: Oh, my God, you totally pulled me in. Wait. How am I learning about racial bias in that? (Laughter) Connect the dots for me.
JOHNSON: Yes, absolutely - right? - because your brain was automatically processing things, right?
CHANG: Yeah.
JOHNSON: It was anticipating things, right?
CHANG: Yes.
JOHNSON: Your brain has...
CHANG: Yes.
JOHNSON: I like to say our brains are like Google - right? - that every experience you've had, every show you've watched, everything that you've read - I mean, we develop, derive19 bias from just seeing certain pairings of words together over time. And those bits of information help us navigate our unconscious processes.
CHANG: OK, but you are talking about rejiggering some really fundamental processes going on in the human brain. And it sounds like this Starbucks training might just be one afternoon. Given your experience, how much can you accomplish in one afternoon? Would that even be meaningful?
JOHNSON: I think at best it will spark curiosity and an awareness that biases do not make us bad people - they actually make us human - but that we do have a capacity to override20 them. And it's really important for us to build in systems and practices that help us do that.
CHANG: Alexis McGill Johnson is executive director of the Perception Institute. Thanks very much for joining us today.
JOHNSON: Thank you so much for having me.
1 bias | |
n.偏见,偏心,偏袒;vt.使有偏见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 implicit | |
a.暗示的,含蓄的,不明晰的,绝对的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 stereotypes | |
n.老套,模式化的见解,有老一套固定想法的人( stereotype的名词复数 )v.把…模式化,使成陈规( stereotype的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 embedded | |
a.扎牢的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 awareness | |
n.意识,觉悟,懂事,明智 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 essentially | |
adv.本质上,实质上,基本上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 navigate | |
v.航行,飞行;导航,领航 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 intentional | |
adj.故意的,有意(识)的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 biases | |
偏见( bias的名词复数 ); 偏爱; 特殊能力; 斜纹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 disarming | |
adj.消除敌意的,使人消气的v.裁军( disarm的现在分词 );使息怒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 paradox | |
n.似乎矛盾却正确的说法;自相矛盾的人(物) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 genders | |
n.性某些语言的(阳性、阴性和中性,不同的性有不同的词尾等)( gender的名词复数 );性别;某些语言的(名词、代词和形容词)性的区分 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 gender | |
n.(生理上的)性,(名词、代词等的)性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 overriding | |
a.最主要的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 illustrate | |
v.举例说明,阐明;图解,加插图 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 radius | |
n.半径,半径范围;有效航程,范围,界限 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 yoke | |
n.轭;支配;v.给...上轭,连接,使成配偶 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 derive | |
v.取得;导出;引申;来自;源自;出自 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 override | |
vt.不顾,不理睬,否决;压倒,优先于 | |
参考例句: |
|
|