-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Democrats1 Want To End Dark Money, But First They Want To Use It
DAVID GREENE, HOST:
Last year's midterm elections marked a turning point in big-money politics. Liberals have overtaken conservatives in one type of so-called dark money - that is, money from secret donors2 to tax-exempt3 groups that's spent on explicitly4 political messaging. At the same time, congressional Democrats are pushing to make these contributions transparent5, as NPR's Peter Overby reports.
PETER OVERBY, BYLINE6: Most of the best-known secret money groups are conservative - the National Rifle Association, Americans for Prosperity, Crossroads GPS and others. So how much do Democrats want to expose this kind of politicking7? H.R.1, which would force tax-exempt groups to disclose their big donors, was the first bill passed by the Democratic-majority House this year.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR #1: (As character) Congress is totally corrupt8.
UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR #2: (As character) Eighty-six percent of people agree.
UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR #3: (As character) That means whoever you vote for, they're going to screw you over.
UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR #4: (As character) I feel totally helpless.
OVERBY: This pro-Democratic TV ad ran in the 2018 midterm elections.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR #5: (As character) No suppression, no gerrymandering, no foreign influence...
UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR #1: (As character) What about dark money?
UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR #5: (As character) No dark money. Full disclosure of donors and lobbyists.
OVERBY: The slam on dark money came from Future Majority, a tax-exempt group that uses dark money. It plans to spend $60 million in the 2020 elections. Conservatives embraced tax-exempt groups starting around the 2008 campaign. The Supreme9 Court's Citizens United ruling in 2010 made the groups more versatile10. Democrats have mostly scorned them. But Mark Riddle11, director of Future Majority, is among the Democratic pragmatists.
MARK RIDDLE: I have no misgivings13. On election night in 2018, I didn't hear anybody go, oh, geez, we won. But gosh, wasn't all that stuff really bad that helped everybody win (laughter)?
OVERBY: Riddle said Future Majority will concentrate on messaging, branding and strategic advice, mostly in the Midwestern states.
RIDDLE: I think looking at the best tactics and the best words and the best images is going to be really, really important going against one of the great marketers in Donald Trump14.
OVERBY: But after that, he said, he'd rather not have secret money.
RIDDLE: I actually do believe that the House Bill 1 is, maybe, the most important piece of legislation that can be passed.
OVERBY: In the 2018 elections, the secret money groups spent about $150 million on explicitly political activities. That's according to a report by the government reform group, Issue One. It said about one-third of that spending was done by one group, Majority Forward, which mainly attacks Republican Senate candidates with ads like this one.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR #6: (As character) Martha McSally is lying through her teeth. Dangerous lies with dire12 consequences...
OVERBY: Issue One's Michael Beckel said researchers worked to identify the donors behind the groups.
MICHAEL BECKEL: We turned over every rock we could, and we could only identify about $2 of every $9 that these groups had raised.
OVERBY: But here's the long view. The political parties have been fighting over the same issue since the 1980s. It's how to get and use soft money - money that's exempt from the contribution limits and from the transparency of campaign finance laws. Sometimes a strategy starts with one party, sometimes with the other. Robin15 Kolodny is a political scientist at Temple University in Philadelphia. She studies the history of campaign finance.
ROBIN KOLODNY: One party stretches the law, gets away with it. And then the other party just goes ahead and does the same thing. And then eventually, the FEC will just say yeah, obviously. I guess this must be OK.
OVERBY: And now, this variety of secret money has taken root on both sides.
Peter Overby, NPR News, Washington.
(SOUNDBITE OF SLOWLY ROLLING CAMERA'S "CROSSINGS")
1 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 donors | |
n.捐赠者( donor的名词复数 );献血者;捐血者;器官捐献者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 exempt | |
adj.免除的;v.使免除;n.免税者,被免除义务者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 explicitly | |
ad.明确地,显然地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 transparent | |
adj.明显的,无疑的;透明的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 politicking | |
n.政治活动,竞选活动v.从政( politic的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 corrupt | |
v.贿赂,收买;adj.腐败的,贪污的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 versatile | |
adj.通用的,万用的;多才多艺的,多方面的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 riddle | |
n.谜,谜语,粗筛;vt.解谜,给…出谜,筛,检查,鉴定,非难,充满于;vi.出谜 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 dire | |
adj.可怕的,悲惨的,阴惨的,极端的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 misgivings | |
n.疑虑,担忧,害怕;疑虑,担心,恐惧( misgiving的名词复数 );疑惧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 robin | |
n.知更鸟,红襟鸟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|