-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has tried to guide Democrats2 away from starting impeachment3 proceedings5 against President Trump6 since she picked up the gavel this year. But the White House continues to block congressional efforts to investigate the administration and to see the evidence underlying7 special counsel Robert Mueller's report. And more and more Democrats are starting to sound like Representative John Yarmuth of Kentucky.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
JOHN YARMUTH: There's a growing realization8 in the caucus9 that impeachment's inevitable10. So it's not a question of if but when.
CORNISH: The House speaker will hold a special meeting tomorrow morning to hear from Democrats over whether or not to move forward with impeachment. NPR congressional correspondent Susan Davis joins us now. And, Susan, are Democrats at a tipping point?
SUSAN DAVIS, BYLINE11: You know, the needle is certainly moving closer in that direction. They're still divided. It's unclear where they will land. But tomorrow's meeting is a reflection of the fact that Pelosi's sort of slow and steady strategy isn't holding up for a lot of Democrats. They admit they were unprepared for the level of defiance12 they've seen from the Trump administration to their oversight13 demands.
The latest came today in the House Judiciary Committee, where former White House counsel Don McGahn refused to appear after the administration exerted executive privilege over his testimony14 related to the Mueller report. Democrats say it's not just about Mueller. The administration is fighting Congress on a lot of fronts. They're also refusing to turn over the president's tax returns. The cumulative15 effect of all this is you have more and more Democrats saying, look. We didn't want to have to consider impeachment, but we increasingly feel like we have no choice. And it may be the only way to get what we want from this administration.
CORNISH: How would impeachment do that - help them in their struggle to get the testimony and documents and things like that?
DAVIS: It's a really interesting debate inside the party. And I think the people that are hesitant to move forward with impeachment will argue the end game hasn't changed one bit. The Senate's still controlled by Republicans. President Trump is almost certainly not going to be removed from office via impeachment, so you're going to spend a lot of time on something that will not ultimately happen.
But I think Democrats think that opening a formal impeachment investigation16 could change some calculations. I talked to one Rhode Island Democrat1, David Cicilline. He's on the Judiciary Committee. He supports moving forward with impeachment. And he said it's really about sending a message. This is what he said.
DAVID CICILLINE: I think the principal reason to do it is that it will communicate this heightened level of seriousness, and it will be a direct response to an administration that is attempting to cover up and impede17 and obstruct18 Congress's role in conducting an investigation.
DAVIS: Other Democrats on Judiciary also will argue that since impeachment is technically19 a legal proceeding4 - it's sort of like a trial - that it would strengthen their legal hand in getting the administration to cooperate. There's, obviously, no certainty that they would. But defying subpoenas20 in an official impeachment inquiry21 would take this confrontation22 to a whole new level.
CORNISH: Speaker Pelosi has often said that the threshold for impeachment is overwhelming and bipartisan. Are they there yet?
DAVIS: Well, Democrats - it may be becoming overwhelmingly clear, but the country isn't; at least that's what polls tell us. So it's not overwhelming yet, and it's not quite bipartisan. Although, we should say that one Republican, Michigan's Justin Amash, came out in favor of impeachment proceedings over the weekend, although he's a bit of a contrarian in the party not a reflection of the broader mood.
One big thing to watch for, Audie, is when Robert Mueller testifies. There's concern on Capitol Hill that he might try to speak to the Judiciary Committee in private. I've talked to Democrats on the committee that say that won't fly. It needs to be in public, and they want it to happen soon.
CORNISH: That's NPR's Susan Davis. Thanks so much.
DAVIS: You're welcome.
1 democrat | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士;民主党党员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 impeachment | |
n.弹劾;控告;怀疑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 proceeding | |
n.行动,进行,(pl.)会议录,学报 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 proceedings | |
n.进程,过程,议程;诉讼(程序);公报 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 underlying | |
adj.在下面的,含蓄的,潜在的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 realization | |
n.实现;认识到,深刻了解 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 caucus | |
n.秘密会议;干部会议;v.(参加)干部开会议 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 inevitable | |
adj.不可避免的,必然发生的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 defiance | |
n.挑战,挑衅,蔑视,违抗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 oversight | |
n.勘漏,失察,疏忽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 testimony | |
n.证词;见证,证明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 cumulative | |
adj.累积的,渐增的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 investigation | |
n.调查,调查研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 impede | |
v.妨碍,阻碍,阻止 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 obstruct | |
v.阻隔,阻塞(道路、通道等);n.阻碍物,障碍物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 technically | |
adv.专门地,技术上地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 subpoenas | |
n.(传唤出庭的)传票( subpoena的名词复数 )v.(用传票)传唤(某人)( subpoena的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 inquiry | |
n.打听,询问,调查,查问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 confrontation | |
n.对抗,对峙,冲突 | |
参考例句: |
|
|