-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
JEFFREY BROWN:And we turn to a July 1stdeadline for interest rates on student loans and the economic consequences of growing student debt.
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA:Now is not the time for us to turn back on young people.
JEFFREY BROWN:Flanked by students in the Rose Garden today, President Obama again pressed Congress not to allow college loan interest rates to double in a month.
PRESIDENT OBAMA:And that means that the average student with these loans will rack up an additional $1,000 dollars in debt. That's like a $1,000 dollar tax hike. I assume most of you cannot afford that.
JEFFREY BROWN:The president made a similar push last year before Congress ultimately agreed to a one-year fix. That kept rates on federally subsidized Stafford student loans from jumping from 3.4 to 6.8 percent.
A year later, lawmakers from both parties are eager to avert1 the same hike, but they're at odds2 over how.
MAN:Motion to reconsider is laid on the table.
JEFFREY BROWN:Last week, the Republican-led House passed its answer, a bill that would avoid the impending3 rate increase, but tie rates on future loans to treasury4 bonds and allow the rates to float with the market.
House Education and Work Force Committee Chairman John Kline:
REP. JOHN KLINE, R-Minn.: We have an opportunity to provide students with more stability in the long run by putting an end to quick fixes and campaign promises, and we have an opportunity to build upon common ground with the administration to advance a bipartisan solution that's a win for both students and taxpayers6.
JEFFREY BROWN:It's a plan not likely to pass the Democratic-controlled Senate, where there's a push to extend the current government subsidies7.
For his part, the president has also proposed tying rates to treasury notes, but he would allow students to lock in their initial rates for the life of the loans.
PRESIDENT OBAMA:The House bill isn't smart and it's not fair. I'm glad the House is paying attention to it, but they didn't do it the right way.
JEFFREY BROWN:Replying in a statement today, House Speaker John Boehner accused the president of playing partisan5 games, writing: "The differences between the House plan and the president's are small. But, today, rather than working to resolve the issue, the president resorted to a campaign stunt8 to try to score political points."
Meanwhile, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the campaign arm of House Democrats9, announced it has taken out adds in six college papers across the country in a bid to pressure House Republicans on the issue ahead of the 2014 midterm elections.
And we examine some of the possible solutions ahead of the July 1strate hike.
With me are leaders of two nonprofit groups that advocate for the millennial10 generation. Matthew Segal is president of OurTime.org. He was at the White House this week discussing the issue. Evan Feinberg is president of Generation Opportunity. Last year, he made an unsuccessful run for Congress as a Republican. Also joining us is Anya Kamenetz. She's the author of "Generation Debt."
And welcome, all.
Matthew, let me—Segal—let me start with you.
With a specific program before the president and the Congress, what in a nutshell do you think is the best approach right now?
MATTHEW SEGAL, President, OurTime.org: Well, I think, first of all, we need to put this in a larger context and go after the source of the problem, which is the spiraling cost of education in the first place, which is far outpacing the cost of inflation. It's far outpacing the cost of any good.
And until we really rein11 in on the cost of education, and look at the states—47 states have cut higher education—look at the fact that colleges are not necessarily spending their money on learning, but, in fact, on the college experience, investing their money in the wrong sorts of priorities that are for prestige, as opposed to the core competency of the school, and unless we improve the job market so that there's not such a monopoly on needing to go to college as the only way forward, that's really where the real conversation needs to happen.
As far as student interest rates are going, this is completely manufactured crisis that we have kicked the can down the road on, and I think ultimately there will be a 23rd-hour deal that has some combination of pretty much having the 3.4 percent rate continue for a year, until we can have the larger debate.
JEFFREY BROWN: All right, Evan Feinberg, do you agree about the scale of the problem? And what's your possible solution?
EVAN FEINBERG,President, Generation Opportunity: Well, I agree that college affordability12 is the really important issue here.
Young people just simply can't afford college today in today's economy. But I completely disagree about the cause of that. I think both sides are pandering13 right now, trying to offer to young people a lower interest rate on their student loans, when they're really missing the entire problem that government's meddling14, government's involvement, government subsidizing and guaranteeing so much of the cost of higher education is what's made it so expensive in the first place.
So I think both parties right now are really—there isn't a huge difference between the two of them. This is pandering.
JEFFREY BROWN:You're seeing the subsidy15 that—whatever the interest rate is, as a subsidy that is part of the problem?
EVAN FEINBERG:Yes.
So the government took over student loans almost entirely16 as a part of Obamacare, but really the government has been controlling the student loan market for a long time. And by subsidizing and guaranteeing so much of the cost of higher education, government has actually been the problem, not the solution, to the problem of college affordability.
JEFFREY BROWN:And let me bring Anya Kamenetz in here just to give us some larger context, I guess, is -- what—help describe the system as it exists right now.
ANYA KAMENETZ,Author, "Generation Debt": Sure.
So, you know, I think Matthew's got a lot of good points about the cost of higher education. And what we're missing here is the way that the cost and the ability to finance that cost really fit into each other. So, you know, we talk about a subsidy and Obama talked about a tax. The important thing to remember here is that by taking over the student loan industry, the federal government is actually earning $50 billion dollars a year on making those student loans.
And by providing that easy financing, that easy credit to students, it makes it that much easier for the states to turn around and pass the cost or shift the cost from the states on the federal government via this means of student loans. So you really have a very nasty vicious circle, where tuition continues to grow. Affordability, we see, is a really huge problem, particularly for students from lower-income quadrants.
Accessibility is not working. Pell Grants aren't working the way that they should. And none of this is really the way that we would design it if we were to start over from scratch.
JEFFREY BROWN:Well, so, Matthew, pick up on some of that, because in terms of the interest rate itself, you still think the government should play—as opposed to what Evan Feinberg was saying, you still think the government should play some role in that subsidy?
MATTHEW SEGAL:Well, I think it's important to clarify that more student loans is nobody's solution. Student loans are not a good thing.
In fact, ideally, I believe and many young people believe that college is and higher education is a public good and that we as a society all benefit from it, so we have to make it affordable17.
And the way we're going to make it affordable are through Pell Grants, are through state funding and through making sure that colleges use their endowment money and their tuition money to go into learning and scholarships and aid, as opposed to this arms race to the top, if you will, that people in the college administrator18 world are putting into the U.S. News & World Report rankings, which I like to call the “U.S. News & World Report industrial complex,” because it perverse-incentivizes schools to try to build mega-buildings and football fields, as opposed to actually worrying about learning, which is obviously the necessity and core competency of the school.
But I think in terms of the government subsidizing loans, yes, we're going to have massive income inequality to a certain degree unless we do incentivize younger people who are from low-income backgrounds to be able to take out loans that are not going to be subject to usury19 and hiked rates from private lenders who, you know, are making college a big business for them. And should college be a booming business?
That's where there's a philosophical20 disagreement among Democrats and Republicans or just people from different political spectrums.
JEFFREY BROWN:Do you want to respond?
EVAN FEINBERG:Well, I think Matt's talking about the college industrial complex, which is a very real problem, as the government continues to put more and more resources into higher education.
JEFFREY BROWN:So, you—wait. You agree on the industrial complex, but you think it's partly caused by government?
EVAN FEINBERG:Yes, sure.
Anya mentioned that the government profits off of all these loans. I'm not sure that most young people are excited that the government is a huge bank that makes huge profits off of student loans and in the process is driving up the price of education. Right now, we're debating the difference in the rate on a government loan, rather than the size of that loan in the first place.
And as government keeps putting more and more resources into it, it grows the cost. If we gave everyone in America, every young person got $100 dollars to buy an iPhone tomorrow, what would Apple do? They'd raise the price of iPhones because they knew everyone in the country had $100 dollars more to pay for an iPhone.
The problem here is that the government is putting money, so much money, some so many guarantees, so many rules and regulations on higher education, it's driving the price through the roof.
JEFFREY BROWN:Anya, do you see—you look all around the country at different things, the experiments going on. Do you see interesting things that might help us find ways through all this?
ANYA KAMENETZ: You know, I really do.
And there was a really fantastic announcement just made yesterday by Coursera, which is one of the massively open online course platforms. They currently have over three million students enrolled21 in versions of courses from colleges like Harvard and MIT that are absolutely free. Coursera has got Penn and Stanford.
And they just announced partnerships22 with 10 major state university systems. And all of those university systems -- these are in states coast to coast and they're enrolling23 over a million students—are looking at ways to share resources, to collaborate24 and to use technology to really build the infrastructure25 for what we'd all like to see, which is radically26 more affordable and more accessible high-quality learning experiences that can cut through the cost fog.
It's true that the role of easy finance and the ability to borrow has driven up the cost and made—muddied the waters a little bit. But we all think—or many of us believe, especially on the Democratic side, that there is a role for subsidizing education as a public good. The question is, what is the best way to do that?
And I really believe that technology offers a fascinating way forward for a college education that is more like what our parents experienced, which is, in the 1970s, a young person could go to college, a state university, and they could pay for that with a part-time job. And that's what we'd all like to get back to.
JEFFREY BROWN:Well, let me—I'm guessing that you would all agree that the student debt problem is hurting the economy, something we heard in our earlier segment.
MATTHEW SEGAL:It's massively hurting the economy.
JEFFREY BROWN:Yes, do you think the rest of the population understands that? Do you want to start?
MATTHEW SEGAL:No.
I think the problem is we have a student loan debt crisis that people think is just for students, when, in fact, 50 percent of the people with outstanding student loan debt in this country are over the age of 30. By the way, people who are seniors have student loans, and they will deduct27 it, because you cannot forgive student loan debt or restructure student loan debt in bankruptcy28 court, because there are very few, if not negligible, protections for student borrowers.
They will take it out of your Social Security. So, I think the fact that there has not been a vociferous29 student lobby in this area that is advocating for their rights and needs around college affordability and better loan pathways is a very big problem for the economy.
JEFFREY BROWN:Just in our last minute, is this an area we can agree on?
EVAN FEINBERG:Absolutely.
Eighty-four percent of young people 18-29 are delaying major life decisions because of the poor economy and because of the massive student loan debt they're under. Fifty percent are coming out of school and can't find full-time30 work. We have got a real crisis with the millennials.
I think it's a government-caused crisis. The government meddling in student loans, meddling in the economy has made it very difficult for our generation to have the kind of opportunity that our parents and grandparents had. It's a major crisis. But we agree on that.
JEFFREY BROWN:All right, to be continued.
Evan Feinberg, Matthew Segal, and Anya Kamenetz, thank you all very much.
MATTHEW SEGAL:You bet. My pleasure.
ANYA KAMENETZ:Thank you.
点击收听单词发音
1 avert | |
v.防止,避免;转移(目光、注意力等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 odds | |
n.让步,机率,可能性,比率;胜败优劣之别 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 impending | |
a.imminent, about to come or happen | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 treasury | |
n.宝库;国库,金库;文库 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 partisan | |
adj.党派性的;游击队的;n.游击队员;党徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 taxpayers | |
纳税人,纳税的机构( taxpayer的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 subsidies | |
n.补贴,津贴,补助金( subsidy的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 stunt | |
n.惊人表演,绝技,特技;vt.阻碍...发育,妨碍...生长 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 millennial | |
一千年的,千福年的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 rein | |
n.疆绳,统治,支配;vt.以僵绳控制,统治 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 affordability | |
可购性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 pandering | |
v.迎合(他人的低级趣味或淫欲)( pander的现在分词 );纵容某人;迁就某事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 meddling | |
v.干涉,干预(他人事务)( meddle的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 subsidy | |
n.补助金,津贴 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 affordable | |
adj.支付得起的,不太昂贵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 administrator | |
n.经营管理者,行政官员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 usury | |
n.高利贷 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 philosophical | |
adj.哲学家的,哲学上的,达观的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 enrolled | |
adj.入学登记了的v.[亦作enrol]( enroll的过去式和过去分词 );登记,招收,使入伍(或入会、入学等),参加,成为成员;记入名册;卷起,包起 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 partnerships | |
n.伙伴关系( partnership的名词复数 );合伙人身份;合作关系 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 enrolling | |
v.招收( enrol的现在分词 );吸收;入学;加入;[亦作enrol]( enroll的现在分词 );登记,招收,使入伍(或入会、入学等),参加,成为成员;记入名册;卷起,包起 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 collaborate | |
vi.协作,合作;协调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 infrastructure | |
n.下部构造,下部组织,基础结构,基础设施 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 radically | |
ad.根本地,本质地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 deduct | |
vt.扣除,减去 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 bankruptcy | |
n.破产;无偿付能力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 vociferous | |
adj.喧哗的,大叫大嚷的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 full-time | |
adj.满工作日的或工作周的,全时间的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|