-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
JUDY WOODRUFF: The National Basketball Association said that it will make an announcement tomorrow about its investigation1 of the owner of the Los Angeles Clippers, Donald Sterling2, and the racist3 remarks attributed to him.
The league, the rest of its owners, the team’s coach and players are all figuring out what to do next, as the Clippers get set for a playoff game back in Los Angeles tomorrow night.
Word of tomorrow’s statement comes amid mounting pressure on the new NBA commissioner4, Adam Silver, to take strong action against Sterling. Audio clips released by Web sites TMZ and Deadspin purportedly5 capture the Clippers’ owner arguing with a then-girlfriend, identified as V. Stiviano. She defends being seen with former Los Angeles Lakers great Magic Johnson.
V. STIVIANO: I don’t understand. I don’t see your views. I wasn’t raised the way you were raised.
DONALD STERLING: Well then, if you don’t feel — don’t come to my games. Don’t bring black people, and don’t come.
V. STIVIANO: Do you know that you have a whole team that’s black, that plays for you?
DONALD STERLING: You just — do I know? I support them and give them food, and clothes, and cars, and houses.
JUDY WOODRUFF: It doesn’t stop there, as Stiviano, herself of mixed black and Latino heritage, challenges Sterling, and he goes further.
DONALD STERLING: It’s the world. You go to Israel, the blacks are just treated like dogs.
V. STIVIANO: So do you have to treat them like that too?
DONALD STERLING: The white Jews — there’s white Jews and black Jews, do you understand?
V. STIVIANO: And are the black Jews less than the white Jews?
DONALD STERLING: A hundred percent.
In 2009, former NBA Star and Clippers general manager Elgin Baylor filed a wrongful termination suit, alleging8 age and racial discrimination. A jury ruled in favor of Sterling. The Clippers owner and real estate magnate was also sued twice for housing discrimination. The cases were settled out of court.
But the recordings10 have sparked a firestorm. Magic Johnson announced he won’t attend any more Clippers games while Sterling remains11 the owner.
EARVIN “MAGIC” JOHNSON, NBA Hall of Famer: He’s got to give up the team. If he doesn’t like African-Americans and you’re in a league that’s over 70 percent African-American.
MAN: Ding, ding, ding, ding, ding, ding, ding.
(LAUGHTER)
JUDY WOODRUFF: Charlotte Bobcats owner and former superstar Michael Jordan weighed in, saying: “I’m obviously disgusted that a fellow team owner could hold such sickening and offensive views. As a former player, I’m completely outraged13.”
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: When ignorant folks want to advertise their ignorance, you don’t really have to do anything. You just let them talk. And that’s — that’s what happened here.
Miami Heat forward LeBron James:
LEBRON JAMES, Miami Heat: make this the greatest game in the world. And for comments like that, it taints16 our game, and we can’t have that.
JUDY WOODRUFF: The Clippers made their own visual statement, shedding their shirts to reveal inside-out warmups, hiding the team’s logo, before Sunday’s playoff game with the Golden State Warriors17. L.A. lost 118-97.
DOC RIVERS, Head Coach, Los Angeles Clippers: You know, like I said before the game, they’re getting pulled in so many directions, so we have to figure how to pull them in one direction, and then we will be back in the series.
JUDY WOODRUFF: Other teams organized their own silent protests, wearing black socks in some of yesterday’s playoff games. There was more fallout today. The NAACP’s Los Angeles chapter canceled plans for a lifetime achievement award for Sterling. And used car chain CarMax became one of several companies to drop its sponsorship of the Clippers.
So what are the next steps for the NBA and Donald Sterling?
For that and more, I’m joined Michael McCann. He is director of the University of New Hampshire’s Sports and Entertainment Law Institute, and he’s a legal analyst20 for “Sports Illustrated21” magazine. And Kenneth Shropshire is director of the Wharton Sports Business Institute at the University of Pennsylvania.
And we welcome you both to the NewsHour.
Both of you have followed the business of sports for a long time. How do you — what is your reaction to what Donald Sterling is alleged22 to have said.
Michael McCann, you first.
MICHAEL MCCANN, Sports Illustrated: Well, I think, at a starting point, it’s outrageous23 that someone would hold these views in 2014, really at any time, but particularly nowadays.
And I think it’s certainly a matter that the NBA has to address seriously, although I would also note that it’s not an easy process to reconcile. And I say that because the NBA has to approach this under the rules of the league, in ensuring that it doesn’t take any steps that prove to be wrong.
For instance, the recording9 itself, the NBA wants to be sure that it’s authentic24, that it hasn’t been tampered25 with or spliced26 in any way that is inaccurate27. So, the league has to approach this cautiously, but at the same time be sure to issue an appropriate sanction to reflect what was said.
JUDY WOODRUFF: And I want to ask you about that in just a moment.
KENNETH SHROPSHIRE, University of Pennsylvania: Well, it’s not surprising. If you follow Donald Sterling’s — Donald Sterling’s history, this is something that is not new.
I think what is important at this moment is for the league to really recognize that this is a moment in time where they have the opportunity to make the rules right. As Michael refers, it’s very difficult at this time for them to do the right thing.
So, there should be in some sense a form of a morals clause for owners as well within their governing — governance. There should be a way to move somebody out that expresses, that delivers, that actually acts in this type of way.
So, if this is all proven to be true, it’s very sad that the NBA is handcuffed in how rapidly they can move to encourage the divestment of this ownership interest by Donald Sterling.
JUDY WOODRUFF: And, Ken Shropshire, my apology. There’s a little bit of an audio difficulty. Maybe we can get the microphone closer to your mouth, so we can hear you a little bit better.
While that is adjusting, let me come back to you, Michael McCann.
We know the Clippers coach, Doc Rivers, said late today he thinks there’s a strong message coming from the NBA tomorrow. What do you expect them to do? And you have already talked about this. You said it’s complicated. So, what can they do?
MICHAEL MCCANN: Well there’s different options that are on the table.
One is to fine Donald Sterling, is to issue a sanction where he could be fined apparently29 up to $1 million. The fine, though, of $1 million is certainly a lot of money for almost all of us, but Donald Sterling is reportedly worth in the ballpark of $1.9 billion.
I don’t know if a million dollar fine is going to have the impact that is necessary. The league could also suspend him, suspend him for some period of time, a year perhaps, and during which he would be excommunicated from the franchise30. He wouldn’t be able to have any contact with the team, its coaches, its players, its staff, wouldn’t be able to go to practices, wouldn’t be able to go to games.
It would be like a restraining order. That would send a message, although still he could make money off the team. The league could also pursue a more radical31 approach by trying to force him to sell the team. But the league constitution, which is the key legal document at stake, doesn’t likely give the NBA that authority.
And if it were to pursue that path, Donald Sterling could sue the NBA and not be leaving any time soon. I think what we will see tomorrow is that the league will say something to the effect of, Donald Sterling won’t be around the rest of this season, and after which the league will make a more determinative decision.
What would be involved in ending his ownership of the team, which is we heard Magic Johnson and others calling for? They are saying, until he is no longer the owner of the team, they’re not going to the games.
KENNETH SHROPSHIRE: Well, as Michael expressed, it’s a very difficult process, but not one that is impossible.
You know, if you look back through the history of leagues, there’s a case that focuses on the idea of who can become an owner. And the courts expressed the whole idea that it’s an exclusive club. It’s only 30 people that are a part of this club. You can choose your partners carefully.
What we don’t have is strong case law talking about how you can unravel33 that situation. So, that’s the decision the league would have to make if they wanted to take those steps. It would be new territory. The constitution and bylaws don’t express a manner to do this, other than for economic reasons.
But this is the challenge that Adam Silver is confronted with. And it may well be that the path that is taken is one of a series of suspensions. And, as we know, everybody is not with us forever. Sterling is not a young man. So, in a matter of time, the situation will change.
And, as I said, this is not the important issue. The issue is, how are you going to deal with this going forward?
JUDY WOODRUFF: And in the short term — I understand in the longer term, something else could happen.
Michael McCann, what steps could the league take if it decides that suspension and a fine are not enough? How would it technically34, legally move forward?
MICHAEL MCCANN: Well, as Ken noted35, it’s a very difficult situation for the NBA to literally36 for him to sell the team, that the league would have to argue that, under the constitution, which talks about, from when we know — it’s a confidential37 document — from what we know about it, that it talks about forcing an owner to leave when he is in financial trouble, not able to pay bills.
That’s not at stake here. Now, you could maybe take a very expansive view of the language and say, well, some sponsors are cutting deals with the Clippers. That is now starting to threat economically the Clippers and the NBA indirectly38. But, as Ken noted, if the NBA goes down this path, it’s unprecedented39, it’s uncharted, and the language of the key legal documents doesn’t appear to authorize40 it.
And, also, this is the real issue. Will he sue? Will he file a defamation41 lawsuit42? Will he file a breach43 of contract? Will he file an antitrust lawsuit saying the NBA and other teams have joined hands to force me to sell my team at below-market value, I lost hundreds of millions of dollars, which, under antitrust laws, would be troubled?
It’s a situation that could defeat the over — if the goal is to remove Donald Sterling, forcing him out may end up having the opposite effect.
JUDY WOODRUFF: And, of course, we are very much into speculation44 territory here, because we don’t know what the league is going to do.
But, Ken Shropshire, back to you. As we just mentioned, there are advertisers, not just CarMax, but a number of others have said — Mercedes-Benz, car dealers45 and others are saying they are either cutting or suspending their relationship with the team.
Could that economic effect more Donald Sterling to take a step and separate himself?
And it really will not have that much impact. But Michael makes a good point. The idea that it could last for the long term, that that could be pointed47 to as a reason to at least move forward and try to divest28 this ownership interest.
I mean, I think, more realistically, what is happening now is more of a conversation with Sterling, an attempt to have a rational conversation, to point to him, look, this is where this thing is going to end up. We can do this gracefully48 or this will take a long period of time, where there’s going to be a lot of discomfort49 and a lot of people are going to lose a lot of money in the process.
JUDY WOODRUFF: And you’re saying that’s what — you believe that is what is going on behind the scenes right now?
KENNETH SHROPSHIRE: That would be my belief. That would be the most logical step for all the parties to take in this instance.
And I’m sure, as part of the diligence process, that’s what Adam Silver is up to.
JUDY WOODRUFF: Ken Shropshire and Michael McCann, we thank you both.
KENNETH SHROPSHIRE: Thank you.
点击
收听单词发音
收听单词发音 |
1
investigation
|
|
| n.调查，调查研究 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
2
sterling
|
|
| adj.英币的(纯粹的，货真价实的)；n.英国货币(英镑) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
3
racist
|
|
| n.种族主义者，种族主义分子 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
4
commissioner
|
|
| n.（政府厅、局、处等部门）专员，长官，委员 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
5
purportedly
|
|
| adv.据称 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
6
accusations
|
|
| n.指责( accusation的名词复数 )；指控；控告；（被告发、控告的）罪名 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
7
racism
|
|
| n.民族主义；种族歧视(意识) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
8
alleging
|
|
| 断言，宣称，辩解( allege的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
9
recording
|
|
| n.录音，记录 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
10
recordings
|
|
| n.记录( recording的名词复数 )；录音；录像；唱片 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
11
remains
|
|
| n.剩余物，残留物；遗体，遗迹 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
12
ken
|
|
| n.视野，知识领域 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
13
outraged
|
|
| a.震惊的，义愤填膺的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
14
condemned
|
|
| adj. 被责难的, 被宣告有罪的 动词condemn的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
15
spoke
|
|
| n.（车轮的）辐条；轮辐；破坏某人的计划；阻挠某人的行动 v.讲，谈（speak的过去式）；说；演说；从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
16
taints
|
|
| n.变质( taint的名词复数 )；污染；玷污；丑陋或腐败的迹象v.使变质( taint的第三人称单数 )；使污染；败坏；被污染，腐坏，败坏 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
17
warriors
|
|
| 武士，勇士，战士( warrior的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
18
furor
|
|
| n.狂热；大骚动 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
19
affected
|
|
| adj.不自然的，假装的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
20
analyst
|
|
| n.分析家，化验员；心理分析学家 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
21
illustrated
|
|
| adj. 有插图的，列举的 动词illustrate的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
22
alleged
|
|
| a.被指控的，嫌疑的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
23
outrageous
|
|
| adj.无理的，令人不能容忍的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
24
authentic
|
|
| a.真的，真正的；可靠的，可信的，有根据的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
25
tampered
|
|
| v.窜改( tamper的过去式 )；篡改；（用不正当手段）影响；瞎摆弄 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
26
spliced
|
|
| adj.（针织品）加固的n.叠接v.绞接( splice的过去式和过去分词 )；捻接（两段绳子）；胶接；粘接（胶片、磁带等） | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
27
inaccurate
|
|
| adj.错误的，不正确的，不准确的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
28
divest
|
|
| v.脱去，剥除 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
29
apparently
|
|
| adv.显然地；表面上，似乎 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
30
franchise
|
|
| n.特许，特权，专营权，特许权 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
31
radical
|
|
| n.激进份子，原子团，根号；adj.根本的，激进的，彻底的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
32
fixed
|
|
| adj.固定的，不变的，准备好的；(计算机)固定的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
33
unravel
|
|
| v.弄清楚（秘密）；拆开，解开，松开 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
34
technically
|
|
| adv.专门地，技术上地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
35
noted
|
|
| adj.著名的，知名的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
36
literally
|
|
| adv.照字面意义，逐字地；确实 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
37
confidential
|
|
| adj.秘（机）密的，表示信任的，担任机密工作的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
38
indirectly
|
|
| adv.间接地，不直接了当地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
39
unprecedented
|
|
| adj.无前例的，新奇的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
40
authorize
|
|
| v.授权，委任；批准，认可 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
41
defamation
|
|
| n.诽谤；中伤 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
42
lawsuit
|
|
| n.诉讼，控诉 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
43
breach
|
|
| n.违反，不履行；破裂；vt.冲破，攻破 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
44
speculation
|
|
| n.思索，沉思；猜测；投机 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
45
dealers
|
|
| n.商人( dealer的名词复数 )；贩毒者；毒品贩子；发牌者 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
46
immediate
|
|
| adj.立即的；直接的，最接近的；紧靠的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
47
pointed
|
|
| adj.尖的，直截了当的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
48
gracefully
|
|
| ad.大大方方地；优美地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
49
discomfort
|
|
| n.不舒服，不安，难过，困难，不方便 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
购买
在百度中搜索