-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Starbucks founder1 and Chairman Howard Schultz with a warning and a challenge for his ever-expanding coffee empire, Schultz sees a threat to his brand, a problem that could impact everything that's made Starbucks the great American success and growth story it is, and tonight, we are going in-depth on this amazing turn of events. Our Darren Rovell on this fascinating warning from the Starbucks, Darren.
Melissa, you said it, it did come in the form of a memo2 right into Starbucks gossip blogger Jim Romenesko's email box on Wednesday. That's a week after Howard Schultz wrote the notes to top executives. Romenesko told ON THE MONEY he read it yesterday, believed the note was real and posted it on his website, the Wall Street Journal confirming this afternoon that it was in fact genuine.
In the memo, Schultz says he worries about what he calls the commoditization of the brand, as a result of the company's massive expansion over the past decade. And the decisions company officials made that watered down the ideal experience. Many of these decisions were probably right at the time, Schultz writes, and on their own merit would not have created the dilution3 of the experience, but in this case, the sum is much greater and unfortunately much more damaging than the individual pieces. Schultz's more specifically pointing out the effect of rapid growth on store architecture and ambiance.
One of the results has been stores that no longer have the soul of the past and reflect a chain of stores vs. the warm feeling of a neighborhood store. Some people even call our stores sterile4, cookie cutter, no longer reflecting the passion our partners feel about our coffee. All these, Schultz concludes, could lead to loss of market share for the world's largest multinational5 chain of coffee stores. While the current state of affairs for the most part is self-induced. That has led to competitors of all kinds, small and large coffee companies, fast food operators and mom & pops, to position themselves in a way that creates awareness6, trial and loyalty7 of people who previously8 have been Starbucks' customers. This must be eradicated9.
Despite the release of the memo, the stock hardly budging10 on the day. The story hit the wires at 1:23 pm eastern time, shares dropping a mere11 17 cents from that point, closing at $32.75. Perhaps, that was an admission to the fact that most of what Schultz was saying was already obvious. Many customers we talked to today already knew this.
It's lost a little of its romance.
It's not like the way it was in the beginning.
It's not an experiences at all, it's like McDonald's.
Some close watchers of the Starbucks brand think the memo reaching the public is a good thing for investors12 and customers.
Though ultimately I believe that the message is something that needs to be both internal communication and external communication. This is kind of the, the shot over the bow to say, you know, if we don't get back to the things that create the intimate experience, the ubiquity of this brand is gonna work against us.
Now there is debate as to whether Starbucks wanted to leak this memo. One conspiracy13 theory which is writing on Romenesko's blog, their, the release of the memo makes Starbucks look more human, more original and more weak, still there are others that say that the memo would have been more eloquent14 if it were meant to be released.
(Melissa)
I don't know, yeah, it, it's seems to contrive15, but yeah.
Yes, a stallion in there, you kind of wonder.
All right, thanks a lot, Darren.
Vocabulary
a shot over/across the bow phr. a warning to stop doing something
The lawsuit16 is a shot across the bow to businesses that are competing unfairly.
Melissa, you said it, it did come in the form of a memo2 right into Starbucks gossip blogger Jim Romenesko's email box on Wednesday. That's a week after Howard Schultz wrote the notes to top executives. Romenesko told ON THE MONEY he read it yesterday, believed the note was real and posted it on his website, the Wall Street Journal confirming this afternoon that it was in fact genuine.
In the memo, Schultz says he worries about what he calls the commoditization of the brand, as a result of the company's massive expansion over the past decade. And the decisions company officials made that watered down the ideal experience. Many of these decisions were probably right at the time, Schultz writes, and on their own merit would not have created the dilution3 of the experience, but in this case, the sum is much greater and unfortunately much more damaging than the individual pieces. Schultz's more specifically pointing out the effect of rapid growth on store architecture and ambiance.
One of the results has been stores that no longer have the soul of the past and reflect a chain of stores vs. the warm feeling of a neighborhood store. Some people even call our stores sterile4, cookie cutter, no longer reflecting the passion our partners feel about our coffee. All these, Schultz concludes, could lead to loss of market share for the world's largest multinational5 chain of coffee stores. While the current state of affairs for the most part is self-induced. That has led to competitors of all kinds, small and large coffee companies, fast food operators and mom & pops, to position themselves in a way that creates awareness6, trial and loyalty7 of people who previously8 have been Starbucks' customers. This must be eradicated9.
Despite the release of the memo, the stock hardly budging10 on the day. The story hit the wires at 1:23 pm eastern time, shares dropping a mere11 17 cents from that point, closing at $32.75. Perhaps, that was an admission to the fact that most of what Schultz was saying was already obvious. Many customers we talked to today already knew this.
It's lost a little of its romance.
It's not like the way it was in the beginning.
It's not an experiences at all, it's like McDonald's.
Some close watchers of the Starbucks brand think the memo reaching the public is a good thing for investors12 and customers.
Though ultimately I believe that the message is something that needs to be both internal communication and external communication. This is kind of the, the shot over the bow to say, you know, if we don't get back to the things that create the intimate experience, the ubiquity of this brand is gonna work against us.
Now there is debate as to whether Starbucks wanted to leak this memo. One conspiracy13 theory which is writing on Romenesko's blog, their, the release of the memo makes Starbucks look more human, more original and more weak, still there are others that say that the memo would have been more eloquent14 if it were meant to be released.
(Melissa)
I don't know, yeah, it, it's seems to contrive15, but yeah.
Yes, a stallion in there, you kind of wonder.
All right, thanks a lot, Darren.
Vocabulary
a shot over/across the bow phr. a warning to stop doing something
The lawsuit16 is a shot across the bow to businesses that are competing unfairly.
点击
收听单词发音
收听单词发音 |
1
Founder
|
|
| n.创始者，缔造者 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
2
memo
|
|
| n.照会，备忘录；便笺；通知书；规章 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
3
dilution
|
|
| n.稀释，淡化 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
4
sterile
|
|
| adj.不毛的，不孕的，无菌的，枯燥的，贫瘠的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
5
multinational
|
|
| adj.多国的，多种国籍的；n.多国籍公司，跨国公司 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
6
awareness
|
|
| n.意识，觉悟，懂事，明智 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
7
loyalty
|
|
| n.忠诚，忠心 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
8
previously
|
|
| adv.以前，先前（地） | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
9
eradicated
|
|
| 画着根的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
10
budging
|
|
| v.（使）稍微移动( budge的现在分词 )；（使）改变主意，（使）让步 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
11
mere
|
|
| adj.纯粹的；仅仅，只不过 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
12
investors
|
|
| n.投资者，出资者( investor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
13
conspiracy
|
|
| n.阴谋，密谋，共谋 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
14
eloquent
|
|
| adj.雄辩的，口才流利的；明白显示出的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
15
contrive
|
|
| vt.谋划，策划；设法做到；设计，想出 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
16
lawsuit
|
|
| n.诉讼，控诉 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
购买
在百度中搜索